Yes.
On Thursday, 11 February 2016 09:02:42 UTC-6, Niphlod wrote:
>
> hardly 99% it's another markmin version entirely :°°°D
>
> On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 3:48:49 PM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro
> wrote:
>>
>> For basic thinks like **bold**, ''italic'', ``code``, it is the same. But
>>
So, how do we go about using it? May be an example can be posted using the
forum app in appliance?
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 10:02:42 AM UTC-5, Niphlod wrote:
>
> hardly 99% it's another markmin version entirely :°°°D
>
> On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 3:48:49 PM UTC+1, Massimo D
hardly 99% it's another markmin version entirely :°°°D
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 3:48:49 PM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> For basic thinks like **bold**, ''italic'', ``code``, it is the same. But
> the python version does not support embedded html. The JS version does not
> su
For basic thinks like **bold**, ''italic'', ``code``, it is the same. But
the python version does not support embedded html. The JS version does not
support tables and nested lists. The python version uses the format [[label
http:// image]] while the JS version uses the format image:http://.
what is not 100% compatible ? if we want to push this, we should promote it
instead of relying on python code
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 4:55:19 AM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> and the link:
>
> https://github.com/mdipierro/markmin.js
>
> On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 21:55:06
and the link:
https://github.com/mdipierro/markmin.js
On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 21:55:06 UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> I have a new version of markmin.js I recommend this over the python
> implementation. It is better to render on the client because oembed does
> not require setting
6 matches
Mail list logo
