For basic thinks like **bold**, ''italic'', ``code``, it is the same. But the python version does not support embedded html. The JS version does not support tables and nested lists. The python version uses the format [[label http://.... image]] while the JS version uses the format image:http://.... (same for video and audio and frames). The JS version does not support ``...``:class_name.
I like the JS version because it is cleaner and faster and if something is nor supported one can use html. On Thursday, 11 February 2016 03:26:11 UTC-6, Niphlod wrote: > > what is not 100% compatible ? if we want to push this, we should promote > it instead of relying on python code.... > > On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 4:55:19 AM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro > wrote: >> >> and the link: >> >> https://github.com/mdipierro/markmin.js >> >> On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 21:55:06 UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>> >>> I have a new version of markmin.js I recommend this over the python >>> implementation. It is better to render on the client because oembed does >>> not require setting up server side caching. The JS version allows sanitized >>> HTML. Also the heavy lifting is moved to the client. It is not 100% >>> compatible but very close. >>> >> -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues) --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
