For basic thinks like **bold**, ''italic'', ``code``, it is the same. But 
the python version does not support embedded html. The JS version does not 
support tables and nested lists. The python version uses the format [[label 
http://.... image]] while the JS version uses the format image:http://.... 
(same for video and audio and frames). The JS version does not support 
``...``:class_name.

I like the JS version because it is cleaner and faster and if something is 
nor supported one can use html.



On Thursday, 11 February 2016 03:26:11 UTC-6, Niphlod wrote:
>
> what is not 100% compatible ? if we want to push this, we should promote 
> it instead of relying on python code....
>
> On Thursday, February 11, 2016 at 4:55:19 AM UTC+1, Massimo Di Pierro 
> wrote:
>>
>> and the link:
>>
>> https://github.com/mdipierro/markmin.js
>>
>> On Wednesday, 10 February 2016 21:55:06 UTC-6, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a new version of markmin.js I recommend this over the python 
>>> implementation. It is better to render on the client because oembed does 
>>> not require setting up server side caching. The JS version allows sanitized 
>>> HTML. Also the heavy lifting is moved to the client. It is not 100% 
>>> compatible but very close. 
>>>
>>

-- 
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"web2py-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to