look is this http://vimeo.com/38972256
Ovidio Marinho Falcao Neto
Web Developer
ovidio...@gmail.com
ovidiomari...@itjp.net.br
ITJP - itjp.net.br
83 8826 9088 - Oi
83 9334 0266 - Claro
Regarding the error 426 mentionned, I don't know if you tried to use
chromium instead of chrome. At least I has the 426 error in chromium, but
NOT with chrome. Hope this helps.
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2012 17:23:53 UTC+1, Phyo Arkar a écrit :
>
> Websocket is not ready , it is just a draft protocol.
Websocket is not ready , it is just a draft protocol. i wont recommend any
serious use on it.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Abhishek Gupta <
abhishekgupta.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I implemented a similar solution, but the user keeps on getting
> disconnected from the tornado server. This happe
I implemented a similar solution, but the user keeps on getting
disconnected from the tornado server. This happens frequently with chrome.
Any guesses, so as why the user is being disconnected so often (in every
4-5 secs).
for chatting, usually use XMPP like Gtalk or facebook chat. If
choosing between gevent or tornado, gevent can handle better than
tornado.
http://nichol.as/benchmark-of-python-web-servers
On 5 Tháng Giêng, 09:01, Khalil KHAMLICHI
wrote:
> looks like websockets dont work any more with the couple ch
looks like websockets dont work any more with the couple chrome/tornado =>
error : Unexpected response code: 426
attached image from dev. tools in chrome.
<>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Saurabh Kumar wrote:
> Thanks again for the reply.
> The chat room thing is OK. Instead what I am concerned about is if the
> code is efficient enough to handle thousands of request.
>
It should be. That's why Tornado is used -- it is a non-blocking web
server. See
Thanks again for the reply.
The chat room thing is OK. Instead what I am concerned about is if the
code is efficient enough to handle thousands of request.
Saurabh
On Dec 6, 8:59 pm, Massimo Di Pierro
wrote:
> For a chatting server comet_messaging.py is all you need. It already
> support grou
For a chatting server comet_messaging.py is all you need. It already
support groups which you can think of as chat-rooms.
On Dec 6, 3:13 am, Saurabh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the replies. So we will decide upon tornado or gevent.
> One particular concern in our project is to implement t
Hi,
Thanks for the replies. So we will decide upon tornado or gevent.
One particular concern in our project is to implement the server
efficiently. We want a server that can handle thousands of users
chatting simultaneously. Would a simple code like comet_messaging.py
be that capable or we need to
Are you aware of comet_messaging.py
(http://code.google.com/p/web2py/source/browse/gluon/contrib/comet_messaging.py)
-- it uses Tornado? Here's a three part tutorial on using it with Socket.IO
for a chat
application:
http://greg.thehellings.com/2011/04/web2py-websockets-and-socket-io-part-i-b
Look into this:
http://code.google.com/p/web2py/source/browse/gluon/contrib/comet_messaging.py
I would go with tornado or gevent. They seems much simpler then
twisted and more in line with the web2py keep-it-simple phylosophy.
Massimo
On Nov 28, 1:06 pm, Saurabh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are
12 matches
Mail list logo
