Thanks again for the reply. The chat room thing is OK. Instead what I am concerned about is if the code is efficient enough to handle thousands of request.
Saurabh On Dec 6, 8:59 pm, Massimo Di Pierro <massimo.dipie...@gmail.com> wrote: > For a chatting server comet_messaging.py is all you need. It already > support groups which you can think of as chat-rooms. > > On Dec 6, 3:13 am, Saurabh Kumar <saurabh.ca...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > Thanks for the replies. So we will decide upon tornado or gevent. > > One particular concern in our project is to implement the server > > efficiently. We want a server that can handle thousands of users > > chatting simultaneously. Would a simple code like comet_messaging.py > > be that capable or we need to think of some other improvements over > > this? > > > Thanks > > > Saurabh > > > On Nov 29, 12:57 am, Anthony <abasta...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Are you aware of comet_messaging.py > > > (http://code.google.com/p/web2py/source/browse/gluon/contrib/comet_mes...) > > > -- it uses Tornado? Here's a three part tutorial on using it with > > > Socket.IO > > > for a chat > > > application:http://greg.thehellings.com/2011/04/web2py-websockets-and-socket-io-p... > > > > Anthony > > > > On Monday, November 28, 2011 2:06:47 PM UTC-5, Saurabh Kumar wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > We are planning to implement an omegle.com like chatting server. We have > > > > decided to use webpy for the same. Which out of tornado or twisted > > > > framework would be advisable? Is there any other framework especially > > > > suitable for this particular application? > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Saurabh
