Re: [web2py] RBAC and group of role management

2015-11-24 Thread Niphlod
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 3:59:28 PM UTC+1, Richard wrote: > > Thanks for reply Simone, I see the complexity and the limitless recursion > that can occur... I guess, I will go with flat group of access which will > overlap... My main issue was that I would avoid having two way to assign

Re: [web2py] RBAC and group of role management

2015-11-24 Thread Richard Vézina
Thanks for reply Simone, I see the complexity and the limitless recursion that can occur... I guess, I will go with flat group of access which will overlap... My main issue was that I would avoid having two way to assign the same set of permissions... Let say I have tool A, so I create group A, so

Re: [web2py] RBAC and group of role management

2015-11-23 Thread Niphlod
This has been reported before but it just triggers for the next level up in the hierarchy (Group C that manages access to Group B that manages access to Group A). RBAC as is is a complete and finite tool to manage permission: it enforces (as many other things in web2py) sane defaults, levelling

[web2py] RBAC and group of role management

2015-11-23 Thread Richard
Hello, I would like to know how (if possible) I can manage group access for permission granted by other role. For example, I have group A, that allow user member from it to access func A... But how can I create or represent that all members of group B can grant the access to group A and group C