nard > wrote:
>
> > Since WiaB doesn't offer a playback GUI, it's hard to be sure. But
> > WaveImport works by importing the deltas one at a time (which is why it
> > wasn't getting the whole history before; it was only importing the first
> > 1000 delt
13, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote:
> Hello Christian!
>
> I hired Andrew Kaplanov for full time WIAB development. My company use
> GWave now heavily.
> He decided not commit WaveImport (https://github.com/jorkey/WaveImport)
> utility to WIAB main tree, because it
rt.git
> $ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/trunk
>
> Is that not correct?
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 18:30, Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
>> It seems you are using old version of ImportServlet.java
>> Last version of this file already has line
This is a very desirable and timely addition. Thank you very much.
I would ask to add the following. Now interface
org.waveprotocol.box.server.waveserver.SearchProvider consists of this
function:
*SearchResult search(ParticipantId user, String query, int startAt, int
numResults);*
I think parameter
index is not really used in the search results
> representation, only numResults. But you are probably right.
> Anyway, I am planning to work on more simple MongoDB indexing as
> here<http://goo.gl/Xczzb>
> .
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
Summary
---
Exports waves from GW
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-01-23 08:51:37.217928)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-01-25 12:42:15.474368)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-01-26 11:34:03.628318)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-01-27 15:01:43.587307)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-01-28 04:58:44.265321)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
message came to me in WiaB via
> wavyem...@waveinabox.net, but here it his:
>
>
>> from: Andrew Kaplanov
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have recreated repository AkWiab on GitHub by forking from
>> https://github.com/apache/wave.
>> You can fork ne
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-03 09:59:29.365802)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-06 08:08:26.961551)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3771/
---
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
Summary
---
See https://issues.ap
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-07 12:43:00.214489)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
ot a participant of
[WaveletName localhost/w+b8y1ckplA/localhost/conv+root]
- Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/#review4646
------
be necessary.
- Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/#review4647
---
On 2012-02-07 12:43:0
he exception mechanism
> > will work better here compared to returning status in the output.
> > Also, according to Java conventions, methods that return boolean should
> > start with "is, has" etc...
Changed signature of this method to String with reply from se
eIdToPathSegment
done
- Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/#review4820
---
On 2012-02-0
, line 233
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/diff/7/?file=72575#file72575line233>
> >
> > Would be better if we could enable/disable the import portlet based on
> > a flag. But it doesn't has to be implemented in this patch.
done
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3771/
---
(Updated 2012-02-08 11:29:43.942772)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-08 12:45:34.190818)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3771/
---
(Updated 2012-02-08 12:57:53.952969)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-09 08:30:08.093073)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-13 08:02:05.624235)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-13 08:09:43.344564)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/#review5020
---
On 2012-02-13 08:09:43, Andrew Kaplanov wrot
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-13 10:41:09.070583)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
--
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/#review5048
---
On 2012-02-13 10:41:09, Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> --
/3564/diff/13/?file=74670#file74670line204>
> >
> > Can we extract this "00" format into constant?
Yes.
- Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://revie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3564/
---
(Updated 2012-02-15 07:29:30.728830)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4361/
---
(Updated 2012-03-16 05:19:11.883337)
Review request for wave and Yuri Zelikov.
view request for wave, Michael MacFadden and Andrew Kaplanov.
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> Handles the second part of issue WAVE-305 - cannot open new wave.
>
>
> This addresses bug WAVE-305.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-305
>
>
&g
I experimented with the subject and follow instructions on the page
http://www.waveprotocol.org/code/tutorials/gadgets-with-your-own-gadget-server.
I
have found an typo and inaccuracy in the description.
1) There is no file containers.js, it is container.js.
2) There are many files with path
WEB-I
7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
col/wave/media/model/AttachmentDocumentWrapperTest.java
1393974
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
col/wave/media/model/AttachmentDocumentWrapperTest.java
1393974
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
col/wave/media/model/AttachmentDocumentWrapperTest.java
1393974
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/#review12284
-------
On Oct. 10, 2012, 8:13 a.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> -
col/wave/media/model/AttachmentDocumentWrapperTest.java
1393974
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
x/server/persistence/AttachmentStoreTestBase.java
1393974
./test/org/waveprotocol/wave/media/model/AttachmentDocumentWrapperTest.java
1393974
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
x/server/persistence/AttachmentStoreTestBase.java
1393974
./test/org/waveprotocol/wave/media/model/AttachmentDocumentWrapperTest.java
1393974
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
ache.org/r/7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
col/wave/media/model/MutableClientAttachment.java 1393974
./test/org/waveprotocol/box/server/persistence/AttachmentStoreTestBase.java
1393974
./test/org/waveprotocol/wave/media/model/AttachmentDocumentWrapperTest.java
1393974
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
-------
On Oct. 22, 2012, 9:05 a.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7471/
> -
./third_party/runtime/google-api-client/google-oauth-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1406525
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
; we re-use the existing code?
> > Also, what is the use of "timeout" here?
See below.
- Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/#review13289
-
./third_party/runtime/google-api-client/google-http-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1406525
./third_party/runtime/google-api-client/google-oauth-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1406525
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
> On Nov. 10, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > ./src/com/google/wave/api/WaveService.java, line 89
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/2/?file=186881#file186881line89>
> >
> > Why use this additional field?
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote
> On Nov. 10, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > ./src/com/google/wave/api/WaveService.java, line 89
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/2/?file=186881#file186881line89>
> >
> > Why use this additional field?
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote
> On Nov. 10, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > ./src/com/google/wave/api/WaveService.java, line 89
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/2/?file=186881#file186881line89>
> >
> > Why use this additional field?
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote
> On Nov. 10, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > ./src/com/google/wave/api/WaveService.java, line 89
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/2/?file=186881#file186881line89>
> >
> > Why use this additional field?
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote
> On Nov. 10, 2012, 5:31 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > ./src/com/google/wave/api/WaveService.java, line 89
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/2/?file=186881#file186881line89>
> >
> > Why use this additional field?
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote
gle-api-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1406525
./third_party/runtime/google-api-client/google-http-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1406525
./third_party/runtime/google-api-client/google-oauth-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1406525
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
-client/google-http-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1413384
./third_party/runtime/google-api-client/google-oauth-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1413384
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
w
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/#review13539
---
On Nov. 25, 2012, 7:12 p.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
>
> On Nov. 17, 2012, 11:01 a.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > ./src/org/waveprotocol/box/server/robots/OperationContextImpl.java, line 388
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/4/?file=188629#file188629line388>
> >
> > Why null and not "Immutable
g the participantId?
> > Like ParticipantId.of(participant).getAddress()
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
> No, ParticipantId.of(participant).getAddress() is participant with
> normalization.
>
> Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> Can you add then appropriate method to Partici
/google-http-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1413384
./third_party/runtime/google-api-client/google-oauth-client-1.5.0-beta.jar
1413384
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
> On Nov. 24, 2012, 10:17 a.m., rocklund wrote:
> > Any comments on this? Is this a feature we would like to have?
I think most evil in the search today - pooling requests.
That are useless traffic, digest update delay, useless overhead on the server.
The server must notify the client about chan
> On Nov. 29, 2012, 12:34 a.m., Angus Turner wrote:
> > No obvious errors to me, looks good.
I think better to close test file within try/catch block in finally section.
- Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
vletTest.java
- Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7958/#review13935
---
On Nov. 26, 2012, 11:44 a.m
> On Dec. 1, 2012, 3:26 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > LGTM
> > Committed as r1416008
>
> Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> Please close the review request
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
> Please remove obsolete file
> test/org/waveprotocol/box/server/waveserver/Imp
nk you!
Andrew Kaplanov.
2012/12/20 David Starina
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to help you with translation of Apache Wave into Slovenian
> language. How can I do this?
>
> Best regards,
> David Starina
>
Hmm, I don't see it.
Did you add akapla...@gmail.com?
2012/12/21 David Starina
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I made the translation of the file and added you as the participant. Is
> that it?
>
> Thank you,
> Best regards,
> David
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Niklaus Hofer >wrote:
>
> >
> > > It l
Ok, I added your localization.
Please check.
2012/12/21 David Starina
> Yes, I added "akapla...@gmail.com" and also "@wiab.pro". It is named
> "Localization
> - Slovenian". Still can't see it?
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Andrew Kap
to the blip) is not
> translatable (just as a note).
>
> Best regards,
> David
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Kaplanov >wrote:
>
> > Ok, I added your localization.
> > Please check.
> >
> > 2012/12/21 David Starina
> >
&
hanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
ply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/#review15237
-------
On Jan. 10, 2013, 9:04 p.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail
e default message here as well? This is
> > duplicating the message between this file and the properties file.
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
> GWT does not compile resources without default messages.
>
> Ali Lown wrote:
> The workaround detailed here[0] using set-pro
/wave/client/wavepanel/view/dom/full/RootThreadViewBuilderTest.java
1430452
./test/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/wavepanel/view/dom/full/UiBuilderTestHelper.java
1430452
./war/static/earth.png UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
tically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/#review15390
-------
On Jan. 12, 2013, 9:24 p.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an
./war/static/earth.png UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
ragmented and I
> > think it's very anonying to maintain (and to translate). I think it's more
> > interesting/useful to keep one Message class in each client package/jar.
> > Maybe you have some reason to create so many message files that I don't
> > know.
/full/UiBuilderTestHelper.java
1436498
./war/static/earth.png UNKNOWN
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8916/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
ragmented and I
> > think it's very anonying to maintain (and to translate). I think it's more
> > interesting/useful to keep one Message class in each client package/jar.
> > Maybe you have some reason to create so many message files that I don't
> > know.
Totally agree with all, we need to get better and do more to just became
bigger and better.
2013/6/15 John Blossom
> Christian,
>
> Thanks for clarifying this. One of the factors which I hope that the
> developers new to Apache consider is that just because one calls their
> product open source
I think all that does not develop - dies.
Unfortunately, all that is happening lately in the Apache Wave - empty talk
...
2013/12/10 Upayavira
> It seems to me that the time has come to make a decision here, and for
> now, I'm going to ask that we consider just one simple question:
>
> * Shoul
Hi Bruce,
Wiab.pro uses file delta and snapshot store.
2013/12/12 Bruce Hellstrom
> Hi Kirill,
>
> Does wiab.pro still use a file backend for waves, or is it using a db?
>
> Bruce
>
>
> On 12/11/2013 04:26 PM, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote:
>
>> New changes still not commited to the main repo.
>>
-0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar a40c88f
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
ab81e5ec2ac34541b32537e1496d02ba1f129c9e
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.3.0.jar
f78b32b05c97c4b27f574849143935dfa8e1e5a5
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.5.0.jar PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
ab81e5ec2ac34541b32537e1496d02ba1f129c9e
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.3.0.jar
f78b32b05c97c4b27f574849143935dfa8e1e5a5
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.5.0.jar PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
-
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/#review31244
---
On Jan. 6, 2014, 11:42 a.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> ---
/protobuf-java-2.3.0.jar
f78b32b05c97c4b27f574849143935dfa8e1e5a5
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.5.0.jar PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
rd_party/runtime/jetty/websocket-common-9.1.0.v20131115.jar PRE-CREATION
> third_party/runtime/jetty/websocket-server-9.1.0.v20131115.jar PRE-CREATION
> third_party/runtime/jetty/websocket-servlet-9.1.0.v20131115.jar
> PRE-CREATION
> third_party/runtime/protobuf/README.google aa7c8c2
> third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-2.3.0-src.jar
> ab81e5ec2ac34541b32537e1496d02ba1f129c9e
> third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.3.0.jar
> f78b32b05c97c4b27f574849143935dfa8e1e5a5
> third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.5.0.jar PRE-CREATION
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> ---
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Kaplanov
>
>
tomatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/#review31303
---
On Jan. 8, 2014, 6:02 p.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> --
-2.3.0-src.jar ab81e5e
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.3.0.jar f78b32b
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.5.0.jar PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
lly generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/#review31244
-------
On Jan. 8, 2014, 6:36 p.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-
/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.3.0.jar f78b32b
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.5.0.jar PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
> On Jan. 7, 2014, 8:03 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > src/org/waveprotocol/box/server/waveserver/MemoryPerUserWaveViewHandlerImpl.java,
> > line 59
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/3/?file=417411#file417411line59>
> >
> > Fix
g in your new websocket code, I don't know if it's better to update
> > socket-io-java to jetty 9, or to play with things like:
> >
> > https://github.com/Atmosphere/atmosphere/wiki/Writing-WebSocket-Sub-Protocol
> >
>
> Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
> Thanks.
e.org/r/16639/#review31392
---
On Jan. 8, 2014, 6:40 p.m., Andrew Kaplanov wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
&
/protobuf-java-2.3.0.jar f78b32b
third_party/runtime/protobuf/protobuf-java-2.5.0.jar PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Andrew Kaplanov
ogle.com/p/protobuf/downloads/list
- Andrew
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16639/#review31429
-------
On J
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
