> On June 6, 2013, 7:51 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > This looks fine.
> >
> > It is probably worth adding a warning/note that this is only checking one
> > of the 3 possible sets of certificates that you could be interested in with
> > Wave.
> > (Namely, this script only checks the validity of th
> On June 6, 2013, 7:51 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > This looks fine.
> >
> > It is probably worth adding a warning/note that this is only checking one
> > of the 3 possible sets of certificates that you could be interested in with
> > Wave.
> > (Namely, this script only checks the validity of th
> On June 6, 2013, 7:51 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > This looks fine.
> >
> > It is probably worth adding a warning/note that this is only checking one
> > of the 3 possible sets of certificates that you could be interested in with
> > Wave.
> > (Namely, this script only checks the validity of th
> On June 6, 2013, 7:51 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > This looks fine.
> >
> > It is probably worth adding a warning/note that this is only checking one
> > of the 3 possible sets of certificates that you could be interested in with
> > Wave.
> > (Namely, this script only checks the validity of th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11675/#review21538
---
This looks fine.
It is probably worth adding a warning/note that th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11675/
---
Review request for wave.
Description
---
Fix the check-certificates.sh scr
