Yes, that's the one.
-Dave
On May 29, 2011 5:53 AM, "Thomas Wrobel" wrote:
> Just checking, did you mean this one;
>
>
http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/clientserver-protocol
>
> ?
>
> ~~
> Reviews of anything, by anyone;
> www.rateoholic.co.uk
> Please try out my new sit
Just checking, did you mean this one;
http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/clientserver-protocol
?
~~
Reviews of anything, by anyone;
www.rateoholic.co.uk
Please try out my new site and give feedback :)
On 25 May 2011 07:36, David Hearnden wrote:
> There is a technical r
yes, +1 for linky.
(not that I can dedicate much time myself right now, but it would be
nice to see where things are heading)
On 25 May 2011 14:52, ya knygar wrote:
> hello!
> please, provide us with an exact link(s) to the new roadmap, as we have
> difficulties in recognizing
> them.
>
hello!
please, provide us with an exact link(s) to the new roadmap, as we have
difficulties in recognizing
them.
There is a technical roadmap (i.e., rich design docs etc, published
somewhere on the site - let me know if you can't find them) for a new
protocol that overcomes many of the issues with the current one, and works
much better with more advanced features (e.g. diff-on-open). I don't think
it's a mov
Is wiab using protobufs for the future then? or is it going to move to
a different c/s method?
Is there any roadmap for the communication or is it likely to stick to
what it is.
I've been talking with the (https://github.com/alcinnz/PyOfWave) guys
and we are keen on trying to push for some standard
Hi Arne
WIAB uses the protobuf objects for the server-client communication. Take a
look at the protobuf project home page - http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/
,
2011/5/24 Arne Eggert
> Hi,
>
> how can i change the communication between webclient and the waveserver.
> for
> example change the co
