Yes, that's the one.
-Dave On May 29, 2011 5:53 AM, "Thomas Wrobel" <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just checking, did you mean this one; > > http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/clientserver-protocol > > ? > > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > On 25 May 2011 07:36, David Hearnden <hearn...@google.com> wrote: >> There is a technical roadmap (i.e., rich design docs etc, published >> somewhere on the site - let me know if you can't find them) for a new >> protocol that overcomes many of the issues with the current one, and works >> much better with more advanced features (e.g. diff-on-open). I don't think >> it's a moving target - the doc has been ready for a few months, and I don't >> think anyone has significant changes to it in mind. However, AFAIK, nobody >> who's available has signed up to do the work, so there is no timeline for >> it. I was keen to get into it a few months back, and Alex North was too, >> but both our availabilities have significantly diminished. It's probably >> about 2-3 weeks of work for someone to see it through end to end though. It >> was previously blocked by a few things that have now been implemented. >> >> I would strongly encourage not building too much on the current protocol, >> since it has a number of known limitations. The new protocol is simpler and >> achieves a better separation of functionality. If there are a few people >> (PyOfWave?) with the will and a bit of time, then it is very achievable to >> get it rolled out. >> >> -Dave >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Is wiab using protobufs for the future then? or is it going to move to >>> a different c/s method? >>> Is there any roadmap for the communication or is it likely to stick to >>> what it is. >>> I've been talking with the (https://github.com/alcinnz/PyOfWave) guys >>> and we are keen on trying to push for some standard c/s.....a wave >>> equivalent of IMAP maybe...but its kinda hard to know where to start >>> as it all seems a bit of a moving target....or am I wrong? >>> >>> Sorry, been lurking for a bit so I might be out of touch. >>> -Thomas wrobel >>> >>> On 24 May 2011 16:55, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hi Arne >>> > WIAB uses the protobuf objects for the server-client communication. Take >>> a >>> > look at the protobuf project home page - >>> http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/ >>> > , >>> > >>> > 2011/5/24 Arne Eggert <arne.egg...@googlemail.com> >>> > >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> how can i change the communication between webclient and the waveserver. >>> >> for >>> >> example change the communication when the user open a wave. in the file >>> >> org.waveprotocol.box.common.comms.WaveClientRpc.java in the first >>> comment >>> >> is >>> >> written "source: >>> org/waveprotocol/box/common/comms/waveclient-rpc.proto". >>> >> but when i change the waveclient-rpc.proto file nothing happens. no >>> class >>> >> is >>> >> changed. >>> >> What must i do to change the communication between webclient and server >>> >> when >>> >> the user open a wave? >>> >> >>> >> thanks >>> >> Arne >>> >> >>> > >>> >>
