Re: WAVE-70

Hi Ben, > I think that you're right to include the wave in full for a first pass.. So > the email would include three parts "text/plain", "text/html" & > "application/wave" > > The above thou may make the email huge in some cases where its a public > wave or there are lots of participants, would i

Re: WAVE-70

I think that you're right to include the wave in full for a first pass.. So the email would include three parts "text/plain", "text/html" & "application/wave" The above thou may make the email huge in some cases where its a public wave or there are lots of participants, would it be better for the

Re: WAVE-70

Hi Ben, > Sending multiple versions of the email using the MIME implementation would > be perfect, I have just a couple of questions... > 1. I would assume we should send "text/plain" and "text/html", should we > also send something like "application/wave"? What would "application/wave" > look lik

Re: WAVE-70

Hi Ali, Sending multiple versions of the email using the MIME implementation would be perfect, I have just a couple of questions... 1. I would assume we should send "text/plain" and "text/html", should we also send something like "application/wave"? What would "application/wave" look like? is ther

Re: WAVE-70

Hi Ben, > I've read through the JIRA issue and it talks about having two messages > being sent but one of those should just be the wave message being updated > though the wave system, and a second email should be sent though the old > school system using the update to the wave using just the unrea

Re: WAVE-70

Hi Ali, I've read through the JIRA issue and it talks about having two messages being sent but one of those should just be the wave message being updated though the wave system, and a second email should be sent though the old school system using the update to the wave using just the unread blip(s

Re: WAVE-70

Hi Ben, I remember Bruno doing some work on this a while back. You should be able to find his patches in the list archives. The issue seems to be currently assigned to Kasun, but I don't recall anything coming of this, so you should be quite safe to have a go at it. Please re-assign it to yourse

Re: WAVE-70

apache secretary for commit privs.. Regards Ben On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Ben Hegarty wrote: > Hi guys, > > Has anyone looked into this issue? if not I'd like to take ownership and > start work on it, I've submitted the agreement to the > > -- > Regards > Ben > -- Regards Ben