Re: RC7 Vote Release

nager.ME > > /bb > > > > Original Message > From: Dave Ball > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 4:08 PM > To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org > Reply To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: RC7 Vote Release > > +1 > > lgtm - tested simple install,

Re: RC7 Vote Release

rning this message and implied relationship may be  found at TheFinePrint.MediaManager.ME /bb   Original Message   From: Dave Ball Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 4:08 PM To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org Reply To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: RC7 Vote Release +1 lgtm - tested s

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Thanks Yuri for bringing this up. I missed that part, and you are right, having the -incubation part is mandatory. Ali: I think it is better to stay formal in this case. We are voting on the "exact stuff", and changing a name, somehow changes things. I am pretty sure it would be complained about

Re: RC7 Vote Release

I meant "votes". On 9 Apr 2015 10:49, "Ali Lown" wrote: > Are all 7 of those vores binding? > > Do we really need a vote for fixing the name? > > Ali > On 9 Apr 2015 08:02, "Yuri Z" wrote: > >> Hi >> The vote should be over with +7 votes. However it looks like I messed up >> artifacts names - th

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Are all 7 of those vores binding? Do we really need a vote for fixing the name? Ali On 9 Apr 2015 08:02, "Yuri Z" wrote: > Hi > The vote should be over with +7 votes. However it looks like I messed up > artifacts names - they should include "incubating" according to > https://incubator.apache.o

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Hi The vote should be over with +7 votes. However it looks like I messed up artifacts names - they should include "incubating" according to https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#naming I guess I ll create new artifacts with fixed names and post a new release vote... On Wed, Ap

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Hi, Installed RC7 on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. Tested in Firefox and Chrome. Tested memory and MongoDb storage. It works as expected. +1 2015-04-08 11:03 GMT+02:00 Roshan Lakmal : > Hi, > > I installed the RC7 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS and it working fine. > > +1 > > Thanks, > > Roshan > > > > On Tue, Apr

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Hi, I installed the RC7 on Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS and it working fine. +1 Thanks, Roshan On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Ben Hegarty wrote: > Hi, > I've downloaded and ran up an instance to test it's operational @ > wiab.cloudapp.net feel free to test with it. :) > > +1 > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Hi, I've downloaded and ran up an instance to test it's operational @ wiab.cloudapp.net feel free to test with it. :) +1 On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > Hi all, > > The end time for this is tomorrow, more votes = better! > > So, if you downloaded and tested this, but forgot to

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Hi all, The end time for this is tomorrow, more votes = better! So, if you downloaded and tested this, but forgot to send an email, then this is your last chance. If you haven't downloaded and tested this yet, then please do so soon! Thanks, Ali On 5 April 2015 at 22:02, Michael MacFadden wrot

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Ali, Adding them now. First one is in. On 4/4/15, 12:30 PM, "Ali Lown" wrote: >@Michael: What CSS type issues are these? Could you raise a JIRA issue for it? > >Ali > >On 4 April 2015 at 19:58, Michael MacFadden >wrote: >> All, >> >> I installed the RC on OS X and on Windows 7. Ran fine

Re: RC7 Vote Release

@Michael: What CSS type issues are these? Could you raise a JIRA issue for it? Ali On 4 April 2015 at 19:58, Michael MacFadden wrote: > All, > > I installed the RC on OS X and on Windows 7. Ran fine on both. Tested the > UI out in Chrome, FF, and IE. As usual a few CSS type issues, but no >

Re: RC7 Vote Release

All, I installed the RC on OS X and on Windows 7. Ran fine on both. Tested the UI out in Chrome, FF, and IE. As usual a few CSS type issues, but no blockers. Again.. +1. On 4/4/15, 11:24 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote: >+1 I tested install and went over licenses in source files (we still have a >lot

Re: RC7 Vote Release

+1 I tested install and went over licenses in source files (we still have a lot of files with multiple license headers in them), checked NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, CHANGES, THANKS, LICENSE and RELEASE-NOTES files. On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:53 PM Ali Lown wrote: > +1. > > Tested install, federation, memo

Re: RC7 Vote Release

+1. Tested install, federation, memory and file backends. Ali On 2 April 2015 at 14:38, Ali Lown wrote: > I have so far tested the SHA digest, GPG signature, and the > KEYS/CHANGES/RELEASE-NOTE files, all are fine. > > I intend to test federation tomorrow to check it isn't broken. > > Has anyon

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Wow. I figured out my filenames were all missing the "-alpha" part. I then deleted everything again and downloaded. I wrote a script for the downloading part, so I was just executing the same script as before. However the file names were different now. It's all OK now. Thanks for your help. If cu

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Weird, can you please send me the command you use to verify? I am pretty sure I used my own gpg key and not Ali's. gpg --verify apache-wave-bin-0.4.0-alpha.tar.bz2.asc gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 31 23:59:42 2015 IDT using RSA key ID FDE34B63 gpg: Good signature from "Yuri Zelikov " On Thu, Apr

Re: RC7 Vote Release

I have used the link you sent intiailly: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.7-incubating/ which shows files like that: apache-wave-bin-0.4.0-alpha.tar.bz2 On Thu, Apr 2, 2015, at 20:33, Yuri Z wrote: > Please make sure you take the rc7 artifacts. > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Please make sure you take the rc7 artifacts. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:31 PM Ali Lown wrote: > I did not sign this? Are you verifying with gpg --verify? > > Could you provide a snip of 'gpg -k' for what you believe to be myself and > Yuri - and check it against KEYS. > > Ali > On 2 Apr 2015 19:27

Re: RC7 Vote Release

I did not sign this? Are you verifying with gpg --verify? Could you provide a snip of 'gpg -k' for what you believe to be myself and Yuri - and check it against KEYS. Ali On 2 Apr 2015 19:27, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote: > I am confused because Yuri was sending out the release, > but my shell t

Re: RC7 Vote Release

I am confused because Yuri was sending out the release, but my shell tells me this release was signed by Ali. Can you clarify who actually signed this? Otherwise it looks as the sigs would be fine. RAT brought me this: http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat/index.html ***

Re: RC7 Vote Release

I have so far tested the SHA digest, GPG signature, and the KEYS/CHANGES/RELEASE-NOTE files, all are fine. I intend to test federation tomorrow to check it isn't broken. Has anyone checked the file copyright notices? Ali On 2 April 2015 at 00:31, Michael MacFadden wrote: > +1 > > > > > On 4/1/

Re: RC7 Vote Release

+1 On 4/1/15, 3:04 PM, "Dave Ball" wrote: >+1 > >lgtm - tested simple install, user registration and local waves. > >Dave > >On 01/04/15 06:11, Yuri Z wrote: >> RC7 is now available for review. >> >> Artifacts can be found here: >> *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.7-in

Re: RC7 Vote Release

+1 lgtm - tested simple install, user registration and local waves. Dave On 01/04/15 06:11, Yuri Z wrote: RC7 is now available for review. Artifacts can be found here: *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.7-incubating/