Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-07-16 Thread John Blossom
Especially in the latter case of developing nations - but also for mobile users in general - enabling offline modes with synchronisation after an indefinite period is a must. John All the best, John Blossom email: jblos...@gmail.com phone: 203.293.8511 google+: https://google.com/+JohnBlossom

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-07-16 Thread Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado
El 16/07/13 14:04, Ali Lown escribió: > On 16 July 2013 12:48, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote: >> El 15/07/13 19:12, Ali Lown escribió: >>> Deletion: >>> I feel that none of these libraries serve any purpose now, and should >>> be removed. >>> - codegen/SocketIO (superseded by Websockets, could-be-a

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-07-16 Thread Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado
El 15/07/13 19:12, Ali Lown escribió: > Deletion: > I feel that none of these libraries serve any purpose now, and should > be removed. > - codegen/SocketIO (superseded by Websockets, could-be-argued to keep > for legacy situations, but I don't feel it is worth the maintenance > effort) > - runtime

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-07-15 Thread Ali Lown
I had some time to do some work/thinking on this today... Third-party stuff -- Since the maven tasks have gone silent again, I have continued to work with ant on the 0.4 branch. Many of the dependencies are easy to add (with much being pulled from the maven central repositorie

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-06-21 Thread Michael MacFadden
True, I would hate to see us inject ivy if we know we are going to just switch to maven. ~Michael On 6/21/13 4:34 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote: >If I remember correctly, there is a maven transition nearly completed. >Ivy is a good option, but if maven is already done, why not use that? > >O

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-06-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
If I remember correctly, there is a maven transition nearly completed. Ivy is a good option, but if maven is already done, why not use that? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Or use Ivy to download from the Maven repo. > > Upayavira > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Bruno

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-06-21 Thread Upayavira
Or use Ivy to download from the Maven repo. Upayavira On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) wrote: > Presumably we want wiab to be independent from third party download > websites, so the "get-third-party-libs" script should point to our own > mirror of all those jars? >

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-06-21 Thread Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak)
Presumably we want wiab to be independent from third party download websites, so the "get-third-party-libs" script should point to our own mirror of all those jars? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Angus Turner wrote: > +1 to adding all the third party .jars to an ant task. There's a tonne of >

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-06-21 Thread Angus Turner
+1 to adding all the third party .jars to an ant task. There's a tonne of them in there, and it's hard to keep track of what licence what library is under. Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Ali L

Re: Feedback from Incubator Vote

2013-06-21 Thread Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013, at 10:14 AM, Ali Lown wrote: > It looks like RC3 will fail at the Incubator vote. (This is both fine > and expected) Yep. > This also conveniently lets us merge some of the other fixes (for > example the broken translations/eclipse) in for RC4. Okay, but don't absorb *too