I know I asked this before, but when we are ready, just let me know I
would be happy to post the artifact somewhere typical and update the web
site.
I'll also submit some news items to various web sites.
~Michael
On 6/16/13 8:22 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
>Hi Ali,
>
>its ok if you just p
Hi Ali,
its ok if you just pass on the link to the vote result. No need to
search for the individual results, its really too much work. though I
appreciate your precision, if you like it like that it's OK. It just
want to save some time :-)
I believe ML update all couple of hours, but I seriously
Updated (again) results for RC3:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVd6n5_LLWUUfaEkY4kzLDUmd-txyadkMqWKmTfbWTGkSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
+1: 8
Christian Grobmeier (IPMC)
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCAPFNckh
Release that sucka!
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:02 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Updated results for RC3:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVd6n5_LLWUUfaEkY4kzLDUmd-txyadkMqWKmTfbWTGkSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> +1: 7
> Christian Grobmeier (IPMC)
> https://ma
> Did I forget anyone/mis-count?
I didn't have time til today to test it. So... add a +1
BR,
Vicente
Updated results for RC3:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVd6n5_LLWUUfaEkY4kzLDUmd-txyadkMqWKmTfbWTGkSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
+1: 7
Christian Grobmeier (IPMC)
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCAPFNckhyJGt3ttm
Ok. I am quite busy today, so I will (hopefully) post an updated result,
and post on the incubator list by Saturday.
Ali
On 13 Jun 2013 18:59, "Upayavira" wrote:
> Ali, I think we should push this through to the incubator general list
> now. I don't think there's a huge benefit in waiting anymor
Ali, I think we should push this through to the incubator general list
now. I don't think there's a huge benefit in waiting anymore.
Upayavira
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013, at 10:14 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> > Still here, still following and helping out in the background when Googley
> > things arrive (hence
> Still here, still following and helping out in the background when Googley
> things arrive (hence the reason why I abstain my vote, great work though!)
Ok. I hadn't seen you for a while, so I wasn't sure of your status...
Is that a +0 though? (If so, please post on the VOTE thread). :)
Ali
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Looking at the list of comitters for the wave project (including the
> PMC), I have seen on the list over the last few years:
>
> https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wavehttps://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
>
Whilst all the talk of rebuilding is good, can we get some more
reviews of the 0.4 release so we can get that released first...
Thanks.
Ali
On 9 June 2013 07:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Thanks Michael!
>
> Could you answer on the right thread? The problem is, IPMC people will
> look at the
Thanks Michael!
Could you answer on the right thread? The problem is, IPMC people will
look at the wave mailinglist archives and not find your vote in the
right thread, which might lead to questions... sorry for nitpicking!
Cheers
Christian
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 12:24 AM, Michael MacFadden
wro
I tested the real ease candidate on OSX. I also looked through the
packaging. I give it a +1.
On 6/8/13 2:11 PM, "Ali Lown" wrote:
>Looking at the list of comitters for the wave project (including the
>PMC), I have seen on the list over the last few years:
>https://people.apache.org/committers
Looking at the list of comitters for the wave project (including the
PMC), I have seen on the list over the last few years:
https://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wavehttps://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#wave
- Ali Lown
- Christian Grobmeier
- Daniel Danilatos (though
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013, at 09:49 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Ok. I shall wait for a few more days.
>
> (I couldn't post on the incubator list for a few more hours anyway,
> because I have to wait for the mail archives to catch up).
>
> Regarding how to get more committers to vote: I am not sure. I haven
Ok. I shall wait for a few more days.
(I couldn't post on the incubator list for a few more hours anyway,
because I have to wait for the mail archives to catch up).
Regarding how to get more committers to vote: I am not sure. I haven't
seen many of them at all over my last few years following the
Yes, let's get a few more reviews here before we forward it. As I said,
I'm gonna abstain from voting because it is not an area of expertise I
have. I may do a review and vote later.
Upayavira
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013, at 09:29 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hey mate, you have missed the other +1 vo
Hey mate, you have missed the other +1 votes :-)
There was a +1 from Angus Turner, Joseph Gentle and I guess yourself.
Although only PMC (in case of incubator IPMC) votes are binding, the
community / committer votes are extremly important to count. It shows
more people have tested the release and
The result of the voting is:
+1 votes: 1
Christian Grobmeier (binding)
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCAPFNckhyJGt3ttmLQ6g0WfxPJYbjHzQqbg%3Dx3exDA34G6oY8wg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
0 votes: 0
-1 votes: 0
I shall now post to the Incubator PMC for a vote th
19 matches
Mail list logo
