Re: Re-thinking Client-Server protocol

2015-04-04 Thread Thomas Wrobel
Can you clarify #2, what connection has the GWT rich text editor have with anything else? Surely as long as the server is Java, and the client is for the web (and thus JS), you would need GWT to code share, regardless of any rich text editing or lack of :? -- One option to allow non-gwt users is to

Re-thinking Client-Server protocol

2015-04-04 Thread Yuri Z
Hi Let's us try to re-think the WIAB client-server protocol issue. >From what I remember (please correct me if I am wrong) the client interacts with server in four main ways: 1. Requests a snapshot on opening a wave 2. Sends deltas with updates 3. Receives deltas with updates. 4. Interacts directl

Re: WAVE-70

2015-04-04 Thread Ali Lown
Hi Ben, > I've read through the JIRA issue and it talks about having two messages > being sent but one of those should just be the wave message being updated > though the wave system, and a second email should be sent though the old > school system using the update to the wave using just the unrea

Re: RC7 Vote Release

2015-04-04 Thread Ali Lown
@Michael: What CSS type issues are these? Could you raise a JIRA issue for it? Ali On 4 April 2015 at 19:58, Michael MacFadden wrote: > All, > > I installed the RC on OS X and on Windows 7. Ran fine on both. Tested the > UI out in Chrome, FF, and IE. As usual a few CSS type issues, but no >

Re: WAVE-70

2015-04-04 Thread Ben Hegarty
Hi Ali, I've read through the JIRA issue and it talks about having two messages being sent but one of those should just be the wave message being updated though the wave system, and a second email should be sent though the old school system using the update to the wave using just the unread blip(s

Re: WAVE-70

2015-04-04 Thread Ali Lown
Hi Ben, I remember Bruno doing some work on this a while back. You should be able to find his patches in the list archives. The issue seems to be currently assigned to Kasun, but I don't recall anything coming of this, so you should be quite safe to have a go at it. Please re-assign it to yourse

Re: WAVE-70

2015-04-04 Thread Ben Hegarty
apache secretary for commit privs.. Regards Ben On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Ben Hegarty wrote: > Hi guys, > > Has anyone looked into this issue? if not I'd like to take ownership and > start work on it, I've submitted the agreement to the > > -- > Regards > Ben > -- Regards Ben

WAVE-70

2015-04-04 Thread Ben Hegarty
Hi guys, Has anyone looked into this issue? if not I'd like to take ownership and start work on it, I've submitted the agreement to the -- Regards Ben

Re: RC7 Vote Release

2015-04-04 Thread Michael MacFadden
All, I installed the RC on OS X and on Windows 7. Ran fine on both. Tested the UI out in Chrome, FF, and IE. As usual a few CSS type issues, but no blockers. Again.. +1. On 4/4/15, 11:24 AM, "Yuri Z" wrote: >+1 I tested install and went over licenses in source files (we still have a >lot

Re: RC7 Vote Release

2015-04-04 Thread Yuri Z
+1 I tested install and went over licenses in source files (we still have a lot of files with multiple license headers in them), checked NOTICE, DISCLAIMER, CHANGES, THANKS, LICENSE and RELEASE-NOTES files. On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 7:53 PM Ali Lown wrote: > +1. > > Tested install, federation, memo

Re: RC7 Vote Release

2015-04-04 Thread Ali Lown
+1. Tested install, federation, memory and file backends. Ali On 2 April 2015 at 14:38, Ali Lown wrote: > I have so far tested the SHA digest, GPG signature, and the > KEYS/CHANGES/RELEASE-NOTE files, all are fine. > > I intend to test federation tomorrow to check it isn't broken. > > Has anyon