Hi all again,
Sorry for the spam. I have uploaded a diff located at:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/ containing all the license stuff
that needs to be included with the release. This includes some code
headers that were missed.
Something to note is that files such as HTML and CSS have to have t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/
---
(Updated Sept. 13, 2012, 6:22 a.m.)
Review request for wave.
Summary (updated)
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/
---
Review request for wave.
Description
---
Patch ensuring all the code header
All,
You can check to make sure you have a CLA here:
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
~Michael
From: Angus Turner
Reply-To:
Date: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 5:12 PM
To: wave-dev
Subject: CLA's
Hi Wavers,
In anticipation of the upcoming alpha release i'm just checking th
Hi Wavers,
In anticipation of the upcoming alpha release i'm just checking that
all the people who have committed/written code have gotten a CLA
signed and accepted. If not, consider this a subtle reminder :)
--
Thanks
Angus Turner
angusisf...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I've been studying the release document and wading knee-deep through
signing and licensing and all the other requirements and have come up
with a checklist that needs to be done. Whilst it looks big i'm sure
it'll be reduced next time around once we've sorted everything out a
bit more. If a
Hi
I think that would be great!
As Ali already mentioned - there's a WIki on the subject -
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
The preferable way to release it - would be by creating a debian package -
similar to what was done at kune.cc (which is Apache Wave fork) -
https://g
Hi,
I've been a lurker on this list ever since Wave came to Apache. I've been
following it since the sandbox days and have been interested the whole way.
Once it went open source I found I couldn't really contribute as java isn't
really my forte. This looks like a perfect opportunity though and i'l
El 12/09/12 11:54, Yuri Z escribió:
> Probably just a tar. But I ll check if we can create a debian package -
> similar to kune.cc.
>
I can help with the package. Probably our debian package can be a good
start point:
https://gitorious.org/kune/trunk/trees/master/debian
BR,
Vicente
Probably just a tar. But I ll check if we can create a debian package -
similar to kune.cc.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> It looks like they started writing a document here:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>
> How do you propose releasing WIAB? D
It looks like they started writing a document here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
How do you propose releasing WIAB? Do we just want to tar the compiled
code, rather than trying to produce any particular distro's package format?
On 12 Sep 2012 07:28, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
