e_index = feat->node_index;
n = vlib_get_node (vm, node_index);
if (0 == memcmp (n->name, input_feat,
sizeof("ip4-policer-classify") - 1))
return 1;
}
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Onl
f index can be seen in bt #5:
#5 0x7fba88e9ce0b in vlib_increment_combined_counter
(n_bytes=, n_packets=1, index=538976288,
thread_index=0, cm=0x7fba481f46a0) at
/root/build-1908/src/vlib/counter.h:229
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
vpp# show version verbose
Version: v19.08.1-59~ga2aa83ca9-dir
through PPPoE interface.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 7:15 PM Raj via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am observing a VPP crash when approximately 20 - 50 PPPoE clients
> are connecting and traffic is flowing through them. This crash was
> reproducible
some pointers
to figure out
1. Why, when a new session is created, the data of an old session is
changed to 0x1313
2. What debugging steps can I take next to figure out why this happens.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 6:09 PM Raj via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
>
> Hello all
rm this.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 12:17 PM Ni, Hongjun wrote:
>
> Hi Raj,
>
> I tried to reproduce your issue on VPP 20.01 as per your steps for some
> times, but cannot reproduce it.
>
> From your description, please set a breakpoint in
> vnet_pp
ession
initially?
I am trying to understand the architectural rational behind adding one
element to the vector pool at a time, as opposed to allocating a bulk
number initially.
If it is ok to allocate a large pool initially (preferably taking the
max_sessions from a conf file), we can side step thi
is not done. vpp version is: 19.01.3-rc0
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14545): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/14545
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/47761827/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow
Hello all,
I am looking to see if any one has attempted to connect two VPP using
memif and what pps numbers is seen over memif interface? It would be
great if the VPP config too can be shares so that I can recreate it
locally.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:20 PM Jerome Tollet (jtollet)
wrote:
>
> Did you have a look at
> https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1908/report/vpp_performance_tests/throughput_speedup_multi_core/container_memif.html#
> ?
Thanks for this link. I hadn't seen this before.
raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=
fetch the pool with the garbage fib_index.
Is leaving snat_session_key_t sm0 uninitialized intentional, or should
it be initialized?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14587): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mes
0x0
Packet Offload Flags
PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD (0x0080) IP cksum of RX pkt. is valid
PKT_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD (0x0100) L4 cksum of RX pkt. is valid
0x1235: 00:02:40:7b:1b:00 -> 00:01:08:00:06:04
btw, if inner VLAN is specified, everything works fine.
Thanks
Thanks a lot for the clarification!
Raj
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:43 PM John Lo (loj) wrote:
>
> Hi Raj,
>
> A sub-interface with "dot1q inner any" can only work with L2 forwarding via
> cross-connect or bridging where packets are forwarded using MAC header
> witho
so that only outer VLAN interface needs to be created, while
inner VLAN interface will be provided by the control plane
application? Is this a road worth traveling?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1
M] 0.0-20.0 sec 67 datagrams received out-of-order
[ 5] 0.00-20.00 sec 41.2 MBytes 17.3 Mbits/sec 0.106 ms
40505/70904 (57%) receiver
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#14957): https://lists.fd.io/g/v
tx
bytes2533
drops 12
punt 1
ip415386
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 11:25 PM Raj via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> In VPP I have configured policer to
cking if this patch is available or is there any other way to
get PPPoE working in latest version?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11676): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11676
Mute This Topic: https://lis
Thanks a lot to both of you!
Raj
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:17 AM Ni, Hongjun wrote:
>
> Hi Raj,
>
> For the issue you mentioned, Alp Arslan in the To list will submit a patch to
> fix it.
>
> To Alp Arslan,
> Thank you for your great help!
>
> Thanks,
>
Hi,
Just checking if there is movement on this!
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 12:08 PM Raj via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot to both of you!
>
> Raj
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:17 AM Ni, Hongjun wrote:
> >
> > Hi Raj,
> >
> &g
Same here, some example for QoS/Rate limiting would be nice to get started.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 9:39 AM carlito nueno wrote:
>
>
> I am looking for rate limiting (bandwidth/traffic shaping) as well.
>
>
> Vakili, Did you figure it out?
>
>
hanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11810): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11810
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28903866/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/
am able to download at the full interface speed of
100.69.1.4
Any pointers to get this working?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 2:56 PM Raj via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
>
> Same here, some example for QoS/Rate limiting would be nice to get started.
>
> Thanks and Rega
On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 4:44 PM Damjan Marion wrote:
> From VPP perspective sample plugin might be good start, if you have
> any particular questions, drop email here and we will try to explain...
Thanks a lot. Will get back if there are questions.
Thanks and Regards
rse operation?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11878): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11878
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28982509/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: ht
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 4:18 PM Damjan Marion wrote:
>> On 9 Jan 2019, at 09:53, Raj wrote:
>> 1. static_always_inline void
>> vlib_buffer_enqueue_to_next (vlib_main_t * vm, vlib_node_runtime_t * node,
>>u32 * buffers, u16 * nexts,
mask parameter and session
has a match parameter, what do they do?
The example shows how to configure policing for one IP address, what
needs to be done to configure it for another IP address or a network?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to
Hello Hongjun and Alp Arslan,
Just checking if there is any update on this patch.
with regards,
raj
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 6:17 AM Ni, Hongjun wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> For the issue you mentioned, Alp Arslan in the To list will submit a patch to
> fix it.
>
> To Alp Arslan,
&g
Is such a configuration possible? How can I configure VPP for it? Is
there any incompatibility between NAT and Policer?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11963): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11963
here to send
packet since you don't know at compile time whether policer is
configured on interface.".
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:04 PM Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You can use ip4-policer-class
hcp-client-detect"),
};
Its just first time hacking on VPP code, so do let me know if this is
the right way or there is a better way.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11969): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mes
clusion was premature. I still do not quite
understand VNET_FEATURE_INIT to route the traffic the way I want. A
sample code fragment would be very helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11971): https://lists.
}
+
if (PREDICT_FALSE (proto0 == ~0))
{
if (nat_out2in_sm_unknown_proto (sm, b0, ip0, rx_fib_index0))
I hope the approach followed is the correct one, but I could not
figure out why the ASSERT is happening.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at
vpp/lib/libvppinfra.so.18.10
#14 0x7ffcc1a6b2d0 in ?? ()
#15 0x7f7b0a1e996e in vlib_unix_main (argc=2, argv=0x7ffcc1a6c5c8)
at /home//vpp/src/vlib/unix/main.c:676
#16 0x55d570fd6927 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7ffcc1a6c5c8) at
/home//vpp/src/vpp/vnet/main.c:264
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On
f till it
is transmitted NIC/DPDK TX after a delay?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12040): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12040
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/29581029/21656
Group Owne
ge amount of delay, so the buffers
> cannot be used to temporarily store the data.
If my understanding is correct, the comparison is between two packet
copy per packet and performance degradation due to bigger buffers. How
would they compare?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Lin
lly impacting other vpp components, it directly stores
> everything in memory.
That's clear.
Thanks!
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12088): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12088
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/
there is a statement vec_resize (nm->pending_frames,
32). In here, what is pending_frames and what is the significance of
number 32?
I know I have been asking too many questions over here and very
grateful to all who answer.
Thanks a lot!
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messa
next frame and
pending frame. I could not figure out what these are and for what they
are being used.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 9:31 PM Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote:
>
> In vlib – vpp’s basic vector library - frames comprise a single vector, a set
> of scalar varia
Thanks Florin!
Raj
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:07 AM Florin Coras wrote:
>
> Hi Raj,
>
> Partly. Check “show buffers”
>
> Florin
>
> > On Jan 31, 2019, at 1:04 AM, Raj wrote:
> >
> > Hi Florin,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:01 PM Florin Cora
not figure out the exact mechanism.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:21 PM Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote:
>
> Next frames are the physical manifestations of graph arcs. Pending frames are
> graph scheduler run-queue entries.
>
> -Original Message-
> F
_out2in_next_t;
But apparently that is not enough.
Any pointers to figure out the reason why runtime
next_nodes(vlib_node_runtime_t->n_next_nodes) is not updated?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 3:12 PM Raj via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am checking whether p
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 9:19 PM Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
> "use the Force and read the Source..."
Thanks :) Will do!
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12179): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12
quot;),
};
What I would like to know is whether this is the correct fix for this
ASSERT failure, and if yes I am not sure how exactly it works.
Does adding the feature 'nat44-out2in' in the .runs_before of
'ip4-policer-classify' has a side effect of incrementing the value o
load-balance, and packets are not hitting
ip4-my-node.
Do I have to make any other change apart from what I have already done
insert the ip4-my-node into the path?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12353):
put (heap, p);
->mspace_free (msp, object_header);
->ok_magic(fm)
->return (m->magic == mparams.magic); /* here it dumps */
Following is my gdb session transcript:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x75fd9f98 in ok_magic (m=0x13131313cdbec9ad) at
/h
with problem reproduced. In the mean time,
if you like me to check any thing specific I can do it.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12442): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12442
Mute This Topic: https://li
.
stats { socket-name /run/vpp/stats.sock }
Should I have to do any thing else to get the sock file and possibly
enable SHM logging?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12443): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message
script can reliably produce the
crash.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
vppset.sh
Description: application/shellscript
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12481): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12481
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd
sample conf for 18.10
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 8:31 PM Ole Troan wrote:
>
> Hi Raj,
>
> statseg { … }
>
> There is a C API in vpp-api/client/stat_client.h you can use.
> Or a higher level Go, Python or C++ binding too.
>
> Cheers,
> Ole
>
Hello all,
According to docs I can compile g2 using make g2-install. But in 18.10
sources I get this
[raj@vpp-dev-01 build-root (stable-1810)]$ make g2-install
Arch for platform 'native' is native
Finding source for g2
Package g2 not found with path /home/raj
in master/latest - automated
> anomaly detection - and the master/latest version will cheerfully work with
> event-logs from an 18.10 vpp image. So, I'd be tempted to pull master/latest
> and build it.
Will check out master and try.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
automatically.
Also can I view events in real time, rather than saving in a file and
viewing it offline?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12557): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12557
Mute This Topic: https
/vpp/commit/1edfba9a6394128ee5fad2b413e9e0a05972ef48
talks about these events.Do these events gets generated automatically?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
> -Original Message-
> From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Raj
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 8:02 AM
> To: vpp-dev
> Subject: [vpp-dev] Enabling eve
Thanks, I will cross check and get back.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:40 PM Dave Barach (dbarach) wrote:
>
> You're sure that links are up, ipv6 is enabled on the interfaces and all that
> good stuff, right?
>
> If "show ip6 neighbor" s
bort () at abort.c:79
#2 0xc4c8 in os_panic () at /home/raj/vpp/src/vpp/vnet/main.c:335
#3 0x75d0125f in debugger () at /home/raj/vpp/src/vppinfra/error.c:84
#4 0x75d0169a in _clib_error (how_to_die=2,
function_name=0x0, line_number=0, fmt=0x7fffb4860d40 "%s:%d (%s
Thanks Andrew for looking into it.
In the crash I sent, I missed adding ACL. But I was working with 18.10
previously and there I am sure I added ACL, but there was still some
thing amiss. I am now doing the testing once more in 18.10 and will
get back with result.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On
Hi,
Tested again in 18.10, same result.
Configuration:
sh version
vpp v18.10-22~g13f5dcf91 built by raj on vpp-dev-01 at Mon Mar 18 18:38:14
IST 2019
DBGvpp#
DBGvpp#
DBGvpp# set int state GigabitEthernet86/0/3 up
DBGvpp# set int ip address GigabitEthernet86/0/3 xxx.xx.223.14/29
DBGvpp# set
ackets whose destination MAC is the same as the interface
MAC or bcast/mcast MAC. How should I go about fixing this? Would
turning off off this check for TAP interface work? Any better way to
achieve this result?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages s
Will do that and report back.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 7:45 PM Neale Ranns (nranns)
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Raj,
>
>
>
> ABF, which is a feature that runs in the L3 path, has not (to my knowledge
> anyway) been tested with MACIP ACLs – this ACL type is
ectively.
Thanks!
raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12582): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12582
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30439598/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp
Another approach that can be used is to send all PPP/PPPoE control
packets encapsulated in NSH, and Control plane can process it and
return the packets to VPP which will decapsulate the NSH headers and
pass the packets on to PPPoE client.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 7:44 PM
ext0);
I am sure this is not a patch which will be accepted upstream. I am
not sure how to _correctly_ fix this, so that it will be accepted by
upstream. If some pointers are given I can submit a patch to get PPPoE
working correctly again in VPP.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:09 PM
bove TODO related?
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12615): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12615
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/30706811/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:38 PM Michal Cmarada -X (mcmarada - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
>
> Raj: If you have more data available after testing, please provide them here.
> Thanks
My observation is when I use skip of 1, cli works fine while RESTCONF do not.
Config using
"miss_next": "permit"
}
]
}
I can create a classify table like this, with skip_n_vectors as zero,
but with a longer mask and it works fine.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Onl
-process is
not reporting ARP events, though ip-route-resolver-process is doing
so.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12812): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/12812
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/31223
Hi all,
Any one with experience in using Prometheus plugin for VPP stats
monitoring? Any help in getting started with the Prometheus plugin is
much appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#12854): https
.
When a block of IP address is allocated to a PPPoE client, how does
the routing work? How will VPP route the packets, ingress from north,
belonging to a network, to correct PPPoE encapsulation, including MAC
and PPPoE ID?
I guess I am missing some routing command here.
Thanks and Regards,
Raj
Hi ,
I am trying some host application tests ( using LD_PRELOAD) . TCP rx and tx
both work fine. UDP tx also works fine.
The issue is only with UDP rx . In some discussion it was mentioned that
session layer does not support connection-less transports so protocols like udp
still need to accept
gt; 8092
length 1458, checksum 0x0964
00:23:39:401362: ip6-udp-lookup
UDP: src-port 60593 dst-port 8092 (no listener)
00:23:39:401362: ip6-icmp-error
UDP: fd0d:edc4::2001::201 -> fd0d:edc4::2001::203
tos 0x00, flow label 0x0, hop limit 64, payload length 1458
UDP: 60593 -&
Hi Florin,
Yes, [2] patch resolved the IPv6/UDP receiver issue.
Thanks! for your help.
thanks,
-Raj
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:35 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> First of all, with this [1], the vcl test app/client can establish a udpc
> connection. Note that udp will most p
yload length 1458
UDP: 56944 -> 8092
length 1458, checksum 0xb22d
00:09:53:445032: ip6-local
UDP: fd0d:edc4::2001::201 -> fd0d:edc4::2001::203
tos 0x00, flow label 0x0, hop limit 64, payload length 1458
UDP: 56944 -> 8092
length 1458, checksum 0xb22d
00:09:53:
ssions
Thread 7: no sessions
vpp# sh app client
Connection App
[#1][U] fd0d:edc4::2001::203:58926->udp6_tx_8092[shm]
[#1][U] fd0d:edc4::2001::203:63413->udp6_tx_8093[shm]
vpp#
thanks,
-Raj
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 8:50 PM Florin Coras wrote:
>
dp ipv4-other ipv4
ipv6-tcp-ex
ipv6-udp-ex ipv6-frag ipv6-tcp ipv6-udp ipv6-other
ipv6-ex ipv6
tx burst function: (nil)
rx burst function: mlx5_rx_burst
thanks,
-Raj
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 7:55 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
>
Correction : -
Please read 17 Mbps as 17 Gbps and 13Mbps as 13Gbps in my previous mail.
thanks,
-Raj
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 6:41 PM Raj Kumar wrote:
> Hi Florin,
> There is no drop on the interfaces. It is 100G card.
> In UDP tx application, I am using 1460 bytes of buffer to send on
:edc4:ESTABLISHED0 0
Thread 3: active sessions 2
ConnectionState Rx-f
Tx-f
[4:0][T] fd0d:edc4::2001::203:6669->fd0d:edc4:ESTABLISHED0 0
[4:1][T] fd0d:edc4::2001::203:57550->fd0d:edc4ESTABLISHED0
399
[4:
23456 -> 9915
length 7576, checksum 0x225d
01:12:04:676169: error-punt
rx:vppnet1.2001
01:12:04:676170: punt
ip6-udp-lookup: no listener punt
thanks,
-Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15570): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/mess
Hi Florin,
Thanks for the clarification.
Thanks,
-Raj
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 5:14 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Now that’s interesting. VPP detects when an application dies (binary api
> mechanism) and forces through the session layer a de-attach which in turn
> lea
teps that you might
> typically use to run a debug version of the vpp executable file, generate
> packets, and to analyze results.
> wiki.fd.io
>
> --
> *From:* Muthu Raj
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 7, 2020 7:04 PM
> *To:* Filip Tehlar -X (ftehlar - PA
xthop;
>
>ip route add 10.6.0.0/16 via 172.30.x.y lan0.218
>
>
>
> x and y can be anything, apart from x=0 and y=5.
>
>
>
> /neale
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Muthu Raj <
> muthuraj.muth...@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday 11 May 2020 at
over the tunnel.
On Mon, May 11, 2020, 10:26 PM Neale Ranns (nranns)
wrote:
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Muthu Raj
> *Date: *Monday 11 May 2020 at 18:42
> *To: *"Neale Ranns (nranns)"
> *Cc: *"Filip Tehlar -X (ftehlar - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)" <
> fte
output
> feature, but we don’t run features for packets that hit the glean (i.e. I
> need to ARP) adjacency. So the route needs to resolve via a neighbour
> adjacency. It doesn’t have to be a complete adj, hence you don’t need an
> ARP response, so any address will do.
>
>
>
> Hi Muthu,
>
>
>
> I tried your 4over6 config, it doesn’t work… here’s the fix:
>
> https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27019
>
>
>
> /neale
>
>
>
> *From: *Muthu Raj
> *Date: *Monday 11 May 2020 at 21:36
> *To: *"Neale Ranns (nranns)"
>
62 fdir.hi 0x0 fdir.lo 0xed0f5862
Packet Types
RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4 (0x0010) IPv4 packet without extension headers
IP6: 12:27:3c:81:f8:f3 -> 12:43:12:c4:21:97
IPSEC_ESP: 2001::1 -> 2001::2
tos 0x00, flow label 0x0, hop limit 253, payload length 132
Let me know if you need more info.
n the SPD.
>
> The match in the SPD is against SA 20’s tunnel addresses not the policy’s
> local/remote range.
>
>
>
> /neale
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Muthu Raj
> *Date: *Thursday 14 May 2020 at 15:51
> *To: *"muthuraj.muth...@gmail.com"
> *Cc:
patches and it worked perfectly.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/24332
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/24334
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/24462
Thanks,
-Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#16410): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message
.
I will change my application and will update you about the result.
Thanks,
-Raj
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:17 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> We removed udpc transport in vpp. I’ll push a patch that removes it from
> vcl as well.
>
> Calling connect on a udp connec
;16083:1>: session handle 16777216
(STATE_CLOSED): connecting to peer IPv6 2001:5b0::700:b883:31f:29e:9886
port 51190 proto UDP
udpRxThread started!!! ... rx port = 6677vppcom_session_connect() failed
... -115
vcl_session_cleanup:1300: vcl<16083:1>: session 0 [0x0] closing
vcl_worker_cl
cl<24434:1>: session 2 [0x1]
connected! rx_fifo 0x224051a80, refcnt 1, tx_fifo 0x224051980, refcnt 1
vcl_session_app_add_segment_handler:855: vcl<24434:1>: mapped new segment
'24177-4' size 134217728
vcl_session_bound_handler:607: vcl<24434:1>: session 3 [0x0]: lis
Hello,
I am trying out IPSec on VPP, and used the wiki[1] to create an IPSec
tunnel between an AWS instance(remote) and my home. The tunnel was
established successfully, and when pinging an IP on the remote side,
the icmp req flows over the tunnel, is seen by the remote box, and
responded back as
a/types.h:133
#14 dispatch_process (vm=0x76d7c200 ,
p=0x7fffb571a000, last_time_stamp=12611933408198086, f=0x0)
at
/usr/src/debug/vpp-20.05-rc0~748_g83d129837.x86_64/src/vlib/main.c:1569
thanks,
-Raj
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 8:18 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Inline.
&g
ashing with UDPC.
Please let me know if there is any other way to compile VPP with the local
code changes.
thanks,
-Raj
.
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 12:31 AM Florin Coras
wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> By the looks of it, something’s not right because in the logs VCL still
> reports it’s bindi
04b84e0 in ?? ()
#16 0x in ?? ()
thanks,
-Raj
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:17 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Ow, now you’ve hit the untested part of [2]. Could you try this [3]?
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> [3] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27235
>
>
version explaining more things (more like
capturing what neale explained to me) with traces in the VPP user docs.
Thanks Neale, Filip and everyone.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 3:11 PM Neale Ranns (nranns)
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Muthu,
>
>
>
> *From: * on behalf of Muthu Raj <
>
ib_unix_main (argc=50, argv=0x705f00) at
/opt/vpp/src/vlib/unix/main.c:730
#20 0x00407387 in main (argc=50, argv=0x705f00) at
/opt/vpp/src/vpp/vnet/main.c:291
thanks,
-Raj
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 5:02 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Okay, so at least with that we have suppo
:12345OPENED 0 0
Thread 4: active sessions 1
Thanks,
-Raj
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 7:35 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Inline.
>
> On May 31, 2020, at 4:07 PM, Raj Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Florin,
> I was trying this test with debug binaries, but as soon as
[1] on the stable/2005 branch. For now, I
want to stay with stable/2005.
thanks,
-Raj
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:32 PM Florin Coras
wrote:
> Hi Raj,
>
> Inline.
>
> On May 31, 2020, at 8:10 PM, Raj Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi Florin,
> The UDPC connections are working fin
m_session_connect:1756: vcl<47606:1>: session 0 [0x0]: connect failed!
vppcom_session_connect() failed ... -111
>From the traces , it looks like that VCL session is not looking into the
SID entries. Please let me know if I am doing something wrong.
thanks,
-Raj
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020
Hello Amit,
state Master flags: preempt yes accept *no* unicast no
Your clue lies here.
Check https://vpp.flirble.org/master/d7/d40/vrrp_8c_source.html#l00182
and
https://vpp.flirble.org/master/dc/dfb/vrrp__cli_8c.html#a2fd76fa6d5cd9ddfef75af8f0d12e016
HTH.
Muthu
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 2:
14311830
tx bytes ok 128602546562
rx frames ok 1877
rx bytes ok 228452
thanks,
-Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#16863): https://lists.fd.io/g
f=0x0) at
/usr/src/debug/vpp-20.05-9~g0bf9c294c_dirty.x86_64/src/vppinfra/types.h:133
#12 0x7f0f66009024 in ?? ()
Thanks,
-Raj
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#17110): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17110
Mute This Topic: ht
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo