Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED

. Saves you managing various patch files. Regards, neale From: 薛欣颖 Date: Friday, 2 June 2017 at 07:20 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev Subject: Re: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS L3VPN PING FAILED Hi Neale, These patches you upload have something conflict with the master branch.I can

Re: [vpp-dev] question about mfib

Hi Xyxue, To configure a multicast route with multiple replications, one just needs to add the route with multiple paths (like you would for ECMP on a unicast route). For example, do: ip mroute 232.1.1.1 via Eth0 Forward ip mroute 232.1.1.1 via Eth1 Forward ip mroute 232.1.1.1 via Eth2 For

Re: [vpp-dev] Why ip address is mandatory for gre interface?

Hi Wenxian, All interfaces require some IP configuration to become ‘IP enabled’ before they will accept IP traffic. There are 2 ways to IP enable an interface: 1) Add an IP address 2) Make the interface IP unnumbered to another interface that does have an IP address; ‘set int ip un

Re: [vpp-dev] Can we set MPLS exp and ttl fields when programming out labels?

Hi nagp, There’s no means to do that currently, but it would be a welcome addition. Regards, Neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Monday, 5 June 2017 at 08:24 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Can we set MPLS exp and ttl fields when programming out labels? The standard route

Re: [vpp-dev] Can we set MPLS exp and ttl fields when programming out labels?

: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Can we set MPLS exp and ttl fields when programming out labels? Ok great! I will try to get a shot at it. Another related question: When we push one or more labels for a route - does the eos bit get set automatically for the b

[vpp-dev] VPP API improvements - community discussion.

Dear VPP community, Some of the feedback we get from users of VPP is that the client-side API is not particularly user-friendly – we would like to address this. Naturally ☺ In order to create an API that the user community considers effective, easy and intuitive to use, it must be a community

[vpp-dev] VPP API freeze 8th June

Dear All, End of day PST marks the beginning of the VPP API freeze for 17.07. After this time we will not* be accepting patches that change the API (i.e. we will not accept changes to .api files). We do this to provide a moment of calm before the RC0 date to allow external projects a fixed ta

Re: [vpp-dev] [SUSPICIOUS] Is this a valid route?

Hi nagp, That’s the correct way to do it. Does 10.1.1.1 in table 0 have out-labels? It needs then in order to be a resolution target for a labelled recursive. Implicit-null is the expected out-label if 10.1.1.1 is directly attached. Regards, Neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellari

Re: [vpp-dev] Is this a valid route?

golden. The same applies when the next-hop is directly attached. There needs to be an LSP to reach the next-hop – since it’s directly attached imp-null is the out-label. Regards, neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Saturday, 10 June 2017 at 03:50 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" C

Re: [vpp-dev] New vpp node

Hi Alessio, Nothing wrong with your method of compiling/running. Time to break out the debugger; sudo gdb ~/vpp/build-root/build-vpp_debug-native/vpp/bin/vpp (gdb) r -c /etc/vpp/startup.conf (gdb) bt /neale From: on behalf of Alessio Silvestro Date: Monday, 12 June 2017 at 17:42 To: "vpp-

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp ip6 fib

value is the index of the fib_entry_t. If you add this route; Ip route add a/x via b. You’ll first see additions to both tables for b/128 and then additions for a/x. Hth, neale From: Pragash Vijayaragavan Reply-To: "pxv3...@rit.edu" Date: Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 07:26 To: "Neal

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Hi nagp, VPP does support those scenarios. I’ve not written any documentation sadly, so I’ll write some instructions here… When I wrote the mfib/mpls code I did little testing via the debug CLI, so some of the options below are not be available via the CLI, I’ve put those options is []. I’ll be

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

June 2017 at 12:37 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib One question: I dont see a "multicast" option with the "mpls local-label" command with latest VPP - am I missing something? Thanks, -nagp O

Re: [vpp-dev] problem getting udp_register_dst_port interface to work.

Hi Guy, If that’s the full packet trace, then it looks like the packet was dropped by an input feature. Use: sh int feat To see what’s configured. Do you have an IP address configured on the input interface? You’ll need one. If it’s not that, do you have a route for 232.0.0.1 in the multica

Re: [vpp-dev] problem getting udp_register_dst_port interface to work.

game of who-dropped-my-packet. Thanks, neale From: "Guy Doucet -X (gudoucet - FLEXTRONICS CANADA DESIGN SERVICES INC at Cisco)" Date: Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 20:55 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] problem getting udp_register_dst_port interface to

[vpp-dev] FW: API Change: VPP-879 MAP: s/u32 is_add/u8 is_add in map.api

.com" Date: Monday, 19 June 2017 at 15:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: Ole Trøan , "fd.io JJB" , Container PoC Subject: Change in vpp[master]: VPP-879 MAP: s/u32 is_add/u8 is_add in map.api Hello Neale Ranns, I'

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP: Answer UDP Packets

Hi Dharmaray, The short answer is that ip4-lookup performs the lookup in a FIB table of the packet’s destination address, the result of which is an adjacency. The ip4-rewrite node applies the ‘L2’ encap of an adjacency and transmits the packet on the output port*. So typically packets will go f

[vpp-dev] Stable Branch for 17.07 pulled

Dear VPP community, Today is RC0 day, hooray ☺ The release branch for the 17.07 branch has now been pulled: stable/1707, and tags laid. From this point forward, up until the release date on July 19th, we need to be disciplined with respect to bugfix commits. Here are a few common-sense sugge

Re: [vpp-dev] VPLS VPWS problem

Hi Xyxue, I plan to get it committed into master, and so released in the next cycle; 17.10. Regards, neale From: 薛欣颖 Date: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 02:06 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , vpp-dev Subject: Re: Re: VPLS VPWS problem Hi Neale, About https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6861/.

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

more unicast MPLS tunnels in the multicast replication list, then you can create each MPLS tunnel with multiple output labels. Hth, neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Thursday, 29 June 2017 at 13:01 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions

Re: [vpp-dev] A query regarding fib_path_ext_init

Hi nagp, My intention there was to ‘pass ownership’ of the label stack to the extension. The caller, the owner of the rpath, should not then free the label stack. This saves the allocation of a new vector and memcpy. Regards, neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Monday, 3 J

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

…); This is done in fib_path_resolve if the path is flagged as RPF_ID, which yours is not… /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Tuesday, 4 July 2017 at 14:18 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib Hi Neale, I have ad

[vpp-dev] 17.07 RC2 today

Dear All, Today is 17.07 RC2 day, hooray… I will soon be laying the RC2 label. If there are any fixes you would like merged before that, please let me know AYEC. Our patching process continues to remain the same until formal release – please commit fixes to the stable/1707 branch and then che

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 RC2 today

2017 at 14:28 To: Billy McFall , "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] 17.07 RC2 today +1 Fairly important, IMO. Chris. From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Billy McFall Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 9:27 AM To: Neal

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 RC2 today

Dear All, The RC2 label has been placed on this commit. RC2 artefacts are now available in nexus. Regards, neale From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Date: Wednesday, 5 July 2017 at 15:13 To: "Luke, Chris" , Billy McFall Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07

[vpp-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

5 /tmp/hudson5219485721951253061.sh: line 89: extras/vagrant/build.sh: No such file or directory -Original Message- From: "fd.io JJB (Code Review)" Reply-To: "jobbuil...@projectrotterdam.info" Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 10:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

face. Hth, Neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 11:24 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib Thanks for the reply Neale, I see that we can set frp_rpf_id in rpath to point to rpf id and set FIB_ROU

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

Sorry, that should be 17.04… /neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 11:56 To: "csit-...@lists.fd.io" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complet

[vpp-dev] API CHANGE: in vpp[stable/1707]: DHCP complete event sends mask length

stack. Any dissenting voices please -1. Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: "fd.io JJB (Code Review)" Reply-To: "jobbuil...@projectrotterdam.info" Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 13:50 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Subject: Change in vpp[stable/1707]:

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

the stacked DPO chain. But for display purposes, if nothing else, it’s something we should fix. Thanks, neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 15:11 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib Thanks

Re: [vpp-dev] C Rewrite of vppctl and 1707

Merged. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Ed Warnicke Date: Thursday, 6 July 2017 at 17:06 To: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] C Rewrite of vppctl and 1707 I've pushed https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7446/ to fix the vppctl sudo issue in 1707. Ed On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:29 PM, Ed Warnicke mail

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

/#/c/7173/). I will fix this issue for the stable vpp branches. Thanks, -daw- On 7/6/17 8:22 AM, Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: Hello Neale, If I am correct, it is necessary to move/copy vagrant directory from build-root/vagrant/ to extras/vagrant/ in stabl

Re: [vpp-dev] mpls local-label for a PHP route is not installed correctly..

Hi nagp, It’s a non-EOS route, so you need an imp-null output label. /neale From: on behalf of Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 14:10 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] mpls local-label for a PHP route is not installed correctly.. Hi, When I give: mpls local-label 123 non-e

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Hi nagp, vnet_buffer(b0)->ip.rpf_id is set in mpls_label_disposition_inline. Can you show me the MPLS route at the tail again: ‘sh mpls fib 501’ /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 14:05 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [v

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

also print mdd->mdd_rpf_id if it’s non-zero.Be nice if this patch was up-streamed ☺ Thanks /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 17:55 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib Hi Neale

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib Hi Neale, Sure, I will push this and other multicast options in the CLIs shortly. Meanwhile, here is the output from gdb: -- (gdb) p mpls_disp_dpo_pool[0] $1 = {mdd_dpo = {dpoi_type = 27,

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Hi nagp, If the packets arrive IP on an IP interface, then this is not the use-case for RPF-ID. Show me the mfib route and tell me the ingress interface. /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Sunday, 9 July 2017 at 11:13 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Bellari Date: Sunday, 9 July 2017 at 18:54 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib Hi Neale, Please find the output of "show ip mfib table 1" below: -- DBGvpp# show ip mfib table 1 ipv4-VRF:1, fib_index 1 (*, 0.0.0.

Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding mcast fib

Yes, and specifically, at the head the mroute has only an accepting interface, at the tail the mroute has only an RPF-ID. /neale From: Nagaprabhanjan Bellari Date: Monday, 10 July 2017 at 05:56 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] A few questions regarding

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP: Answer UDP Packets

estro Date: Wednesday, 12 July 2017 at 15:30 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: Dharmaray Kundargi , "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP: Answer UDP Packets Hi Neale, can you please point

Re: [vpp-dev] Neighbor unreachability detection in vpp

Hi Andrej, VPP does not run IPv6 neighbour unreachability detection (NUD) so, in the absence of an interface down signal, VPP will not be aware that the endpoint is no longer reachable. /neale From: on behalf of Andrej Mak Date: Thursday, 13 July 2017 at 14:00 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Sub

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP: Answer UDP Packets

Hi Alessio, Don’t call adj_nbr_add_or_lock from a worker thread, it must only be called from the main thread – the adjacency DB is not thread safe. Stash the result of the call in your ‘key’ object. /neale From: Alessio Silvestro Date: Friday, 14 July 2017 at 14:15 To: "Neale Ranns (n

Re: [vpp-dev] show trace bug in vpp stable 1707

Hi Andrew, A couple of things would be useful to help track this down, if you wouldn’t mind. 1. Please run a debug image, then many of those ‘’ will be recovered in the core dump. Then you can (or maybe you can with the image you have) go to frame: #18 0x7732987f in cdp_input_

[vpp-dev] VPP 17.07 release on 19 July

Dear All, The VPP release for 17.07 is just two days away. If there are any patches you would like to have committed before we release, please bring them to my attention AYEC. Thanks, neale ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.

[vpp-dev] Verify failures on Centos .

Hi All, The error below has occurred 4 times in a row on the verify job for: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7586/ anyone have any insight? Thanks, neale 23:10:32 make[2]: Leaving directory `/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-centos7/dpdk' 23:10:32 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp5.x86_64.rpm 2

Re: [vpp-dev] Verify failures on Centos .

v] Error 2 12:38:11 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure -Original Message- From: "Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Date: Monday, 17 July 2017 at 10:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , &q

Re: [vpp-dev] Verify failures on Centos .

n.plugins.robot.RobotParser$RobotParserCallable.invoke(RobotParser.java:77) -Original Message- From: "Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Date: Monday, 17 July 2017 at 10:53 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "cs

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 17.07 release on 19 July

Hello again, If you could also kindly unicast me any feature you would like to see in the 17.07 release notes, that would be most helpful. thanks, neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Date: Monday, 17 July 2017 at 08:23 To: "vpp-

[vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

Dear VPP community, The VPP 17.07 release is complete. The release artefacts are now available on the nexus server. I’d like to take this opportunity to thank you all for your continued support for VPP. Best regards, Neale ___ vpp-dev mailing list

[vpp-dev] API Change: FIB preference

Dear All, This patch: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7586/ added a new field to the IP and MPLS route add API to include a path preference. A value of 0 is the default for the preference. Regards, Neale ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io http

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

es archived anywhere? Ray K On 20/07/2017 16:56, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: > > Dear VPP community, > > The VPP 17.07 release is complete. The release artefacts are now available on the nexus server. > > I’d like to take this opportunity to tha

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

Hi Chris, Thanks for fixing it! Release notes now available at: https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.07/release_notes_1707.html regards, neale -Original Message- From: "Luke, Chris" Date: Monday, 31 July 2017 at 18:01 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "Kinsella, Ray

Re: [vpp-dev] Issue while running VPP inside docker container

Hi Avinash. ‘stuck’ here means running in the foreground without an interactive prompt. If you want a prompt do; ‘vpp unix interactive’ If you want VPP as a background process do; ‘service vpp start’ (if it’s not already running – it usually is after installing the packages). /neale From: on

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 17.10

Hi Tim, We don’t have dates planned yet, but typically the release is in the penultimate week of the month. So probably the week of 23rd October. We do plan to integrate DPDK 17.08 into VPP 17.10. Regards, neale From: on behalf of "Steele, Tim" Date: Monday, 31 July 2017 at 15:49 To: "vpp-

[vpp-dev] API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete

Dear All, I would like to propose the addition of a new API to explicitly create and delete FIB tables. At present the only way to create FIB tables (for e.g. VRFs) is to: 1) Bind an interface to a new table index; ‘set int ip table Eth0 2) Add a route in a new table and set the create_vrf_if_

Re: [vpp-dev] API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete

Chris" Date: Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 14:11 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "csit-...@lists.fd.io" , "honeycomb-...@lists.fd.io" Subject: RE: API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete +1 Do you inte

Re: [vpp-dev] Million prefixes - FIB test

Hi Vitaly, Can you explain to me what you mean by ‘stops responding’? If you can execute ‘sh fib mem’ that implies it’s still responsive? Are you sure you are adding 1 million unique addresses at step 2? Regards, neale From: on behalf of Vitaly I Date: Friday, 4 August 2017 at 14:56 To: "vpp

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release

: Алексей Болдырев Date: Monday, 7 August 2017 at 10:30 To: "Kinsella, Ray" , "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "Luke, Chris" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 Release Tell me please, how many MPLS-labels on the stack supports VPP?

[vpp-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

Hi All, I would like to propose the addition of a dedicated SW interface event message type rather than overload the set flags request. The over-loading of types causes problems for the automatic API generation tools. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7925/ regards, neale _

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete

Wallace Date: Thursday, 3 August 2017 at 22:19 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "csit-...@lists.fd.io" , "honeycomb-...@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [csit-dev] API Change Proposal: explicit FIB table create and delete +1 Dave On 8/

Re: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ Review gerrit please

Merged. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Thomas F Herbert Date: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 16:05 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ Review gerrit please All: Could someone please review this patch? https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7856/ I have some additional depen

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp v17.07 ping assert

Hi Steve, Could you please press the cherry pick button on those review[s] to get them into stable/1707. Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of "Heckman, Steve" Date: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 17:01 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp v17.07 ping assert

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp v17.07 ping assert

Heckman Date: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 at 19:16 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp v17.07 ping assert Neale, Sorry, I'm a bit new to this. I'm working with git cli. What GUI are you referring to? Eclipse/EGit? This is

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

Hi All, Any objections or support for this proposal? Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Date: Monday, 7 August 2017 at 16:02 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "csit-...@lists.fd.io" , "honeycomb-...@lists.fd.

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] API Change: Dedicated SW interface Event

). I’ll give it till the end of the week, then press the button if there are no objections. Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: "Luke, Chris" Date: Wednesday, 9 August 2017 at 14:25 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "csit-...@lists.f

Re: [vpp-dev] Configuring multiple VFRs

Hi Michael, Those configs will work with newer versions of VPP. Are you able to upgrade to 17.07? Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich Date: Wednesday, 9 August 2017 at 18:50 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] Configuring multiple VFRs Hi, We have 3 interfaces. F

Re: [vpp-dev] ip6 route add bug

7 at 14:47 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "John Marshall (jwm)" , Minseok Kwon Subject: ip6 route add bug Hi, When i add the following ip6 route, which starts with "add", the "add" is ignored and the rest of the ip is ad

Re: [vpp-dev] Example of mpls configuration

Hi Michael, See the ‘MPLS FIB’ section of https://wiki.fd.io/images/7/71/FIB_2.0_-_Hierarchical%2C_Protocol_Independent..pdf thanks, neale From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich Date: Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 17:01 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] Example of mpls configurat

Re: [vpp-dev] ip6 route add bug

are applied is important. Regards, neale From: Pragash Vijayaragavan Reply-To: "pxv3...@rit.edu" Date: Friday, 11 August 2017 at 10:12 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , "John Marshall (jwm)" , Minseok Kwon Subject: Re: ip6 route

[vpp-dev] Verify jobs failing - opensuse

Hi All, The verify jobs are failing due to the new opensuse job, e.g. from: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8001/ error is below. Can we please fix ASAP or disable them. Thanks, Neale 18:49:56 [vpp-verify-master-opensuse] $ /bin/bash /tmp/hudson7746568270930707597.sh 18:49:56 make[1]: Entering

Re: [vpp-dev] Spurious make test failure (container POC)

Hi, I think I’ve fixed this with; https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8007/ it was a genuine bug. /neale From: on behalf of "Ed Kern (ejk)" Date: Thursday, 10 August 2017 at 17:59 To: "Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] S

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

Hi Michael, ‘add’ is the default. It’s necessary to specify ‘eos’ because it I the end-of-stack entry you are adding and the default (i.e. without ‘eos’) is to add the non-end-of-stack entry. Regards, neale From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich Date: Monday, 14 August 2017 at 16:58 To: "v

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

On master branch the CLI has changed subtlety to allow one to specify multiple output-labels: ip route add 10.100.2.0/24 table 1 via 10.100.4.12 GigabitEthernet0/6/0 out-labels 222 333 note the change from ‘out-label’ to ‘out-labels’. In older versions passing multiple

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

There is no limit to the number of labels that can be specified. /neale From: on behalf of "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Date: Monday, 14 August 2017 at 18:03 To: Алексей Болдырев , Michael Borokhovich , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question On m

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

‘bind’. It says, whatever IP does for 10.100.2.0/24, MPLS should do for label 222. It will add the eos and non-eos entries appropriately. /neale From: Michael Borokhovich Date: Monday, 14 August 2017 at 18:20 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject

Re: [vpp-dev] MPLS labels question

VPP does not have MPLS trace-route support. I’d suggest using the packet trace; trace add 50 show trace /neale From: Алексей Болдырев Date: Monday, 14 August 2017 at 23:52 To: Michael Borokhovich , "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Packet Generator and pg0 IP address

Hi Michael, Yes you do have to give the pg interface an IP address before it will accept IP packets. We use pg interfaces in the unit-tests so they have to act like real interfaces for us to be able to test all the features. Regards, Neale From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich Date: Monda

Re: [vpp-dev] Set up MPLS via jvpp

, neale From: "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Date: Friday, 18 August 2017 at 06:00 To: Andrej Mak , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Subject: RE: Set up MPLS via jvpp Hi, So I was wrong. I haven’t noticed next_hop

Re: [vpp-dev] Set up MPLS via jvpp

Hi Andrej, Can you please show me exactly was data is passed across the API? Thanks, Neale From: Andrej Mak Date: Monday, 21 August 2017 at 07:05 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io&qu

Re: [vpp-dev] Packet loss on use of API & cmdline

Hi Colin, The instances of barrier syncs you have correctly identified, occur only in the exceptional cases of route addition/deletion and not in the typical case. - adj_last_lock_gone () is called when that adjacency is no longer required, i.e. we are removing the last route, or prob

Re: [vpp-dev] Packet loss on use of API & cmdline

existing flows continue unaffected. Cheers, Colin. From: Neale Ranns (nranns) [mailto:nra...@cisco.com] Sent: 22 August 2017 13:44 To: Colin Tregenza Dancer ; Florin Coras Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Packet loss on use of API & cmdline Hi Colin, The instances of barrier syncs y

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

Hi Jon, (apologies for repeating some of what you already know, but from the top…) A VRF is virtualisation of a router’s *IP* routing and forwarding. VRFs are typically identified by a name (and again typically named to refer to the VPN customer they represent). IP packets in VRF RED must be se

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

changes to make the verify jobs pass. This will take a few weeks (because vacations). Regards, neale -Original Message- From: Jon Loeliger Date: Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 14:49 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structur

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

Hi Jon, Some answers inline. Regards, neale -Original Message- From: Jon Loeliger Date: Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 20:40 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Neale Ran

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

-Original Message- From: Jon Loeliger Date: Tuesday, 29 August 2017 at 21:23 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures >> As with all things VPP the allocation of the data-structure that represents >

Re: [vpp-dev] u32 vs uint32_t

+1. I’ll patch the uses of uin32_t. /neale From: on behalf of "Dave Barach (dbarach)" Date: Monday, 11 September 2017 at 18:59 To: Dave Wallace , Florin Coras , "Luke, Chris" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] u32 vs uint32_t +1, let’s stick with u32... Thanks… Dave From: vpp-dev-boun...@

Re: [vpp-dev] JVPP API for adding MPLS local label

Hi Jozef, It’s mpls_route_add_del Regards, neale From: on behalf of Jozef Glončák Date: Monday, 11 September 2017 at 13:48 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] JVPP API for adding MPLS local label Hello developers, I would like substitude this VPP CLI command mpls local-label a

Re: [vpp-dev] JVPP API for adding MPLS local label

CLI: sh mpls fib API: mpls_fib_dump /neale From: Jozef Glončák Date: Tuesday, 12 September 2017 at 11:16 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] JVPP API for adding MPLS local label Thank you for response. And is there any >>sho

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 1704 and router plugin

Hi Bhanu, Can you give us some information on the CPU arch, OS and compiler version you are using please. My best guess at the issue here is the problem of integer promotion through a variadic function. Perhaps you could test this idea by declaring; int fproto = FIB_PROTOCOL_IP4; And then pass

[vpp-dev] 17.07.01 Released

Dear All, The 17.07.01 release is now available on a nexus server near you. Best regards, neale ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 1704 and router plugin

Hi Bhanu, Sorry, then I’m out of ideas. And I don’t have access to similar HW to try and reproduce and debug. A var args issue is still my best guess. /neale From: Bhanu Chander Gaddoju Date: Tuesday, 19 September 2017 at 10:24 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "Dave Barach (dbarac

Re: [vpp-dev] Problem in ARP reply

Hi Andrew, Can you describe your use case/requirements in more detail please. Addresses on the subnet the ARP request arrives on, the ARP proxy range configured and a packet trace indicating what you consider to be incorrect behaviour. Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Andrew Taylor Date: Su

Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures

Hi Jon, Some answers inline. Thanks, neale -Original Message- From: Jon Loeliger Date: Thursday, 21 September 2017 at 16:42 To: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Cc: vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Static Route Data API Data Structures On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Neale Ran

Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces

To: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "John Lo (loj)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" , Akshaya Nadahalli Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vlan sub interfaces yes i verified it on stable/1707 itself. Regards, Prabhjot Quot

Re: [vpp-dev] mpls tunnel configuration through JVPP

Hi Jozef, To what did you set: mt_sw_if_index ? It should be ~0 on the creation of a new tunnel. /neale -Original Message- From: Jozef Glončák Date: Friday, 29 September 2017 at 04:09 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Cc: "Neale Ranns (nranns)" Subject: mpls tunnel c

Re: [vpp-dev] Adding IP Addr to Multiple IFs

Hi Jon, We don’t support overlapping subnets on interfaces. I was trying to fix the cases where it is errorneously allowed with this patch: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8057/ but I’ve not yet found all the CSIT failures yet. /neale From: on behalf of Jon Loeliger Date: Thursday, 28 September

Re: [vpp-dev] Multiple VRFs in 1609

;Shaw, Jeffrey B" Cc: "Pierre Pfister (ppfister)" , Florin Coras , vpp-dev , "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vppsb-...@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Multiple VRFs in 1609 Hi Jeff, Regarding the workaround for the problem [3] (segfault). Do you think it is en

Re: [vpp-dev] Connect VPP to FRR

Hi Mostafa, Start with this: https://wiki.fd.io/images/7/71/FIB_2.0_-_Hierarchical%2C_Protocol_Independent..pdf then look at some of the examples in: /test/test_mpls.py you’ll find a VPLS setup in there too. Regards, neale From: on behalf of Mostafa Salari Date: Sunday, 8 October 2017

Re: [vpp-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello packets are dropped by VPP

Hi Michael, Could you give me a ‘sh trace’ ? Thanks, neale From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich Date: Monday, 9 October 2017 at 18:14 To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello packets are dropped by VPP Hi, After applying the fixes suggested by Je

Re: [vpp-dev] [vppsb-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello packets are dropped by VPP

Hi Michael, Both of; vppctl ip mroute 224.0.0.0/8 via GigabitEthernet0/4/0 Accept vppctl ip mroute 224.0.0.0/8 via local Forward the first says you are accepting (i.e RPF checks on) GigE0/4/0 the second says you are ‘forwarding/replicating’ to VPP’s local IP stack. The mfib equivalent of th

  1   2   3   >