[vpp-dev] Port mirroring support in vpp

Hi VPP devs, I'm trying to figure out whether it's possible to set up port mirroring on a vhost-user port in VPP. The case I'm trying to make work is simple: I have traffic between two vms (using vhost-user ports) and I want to listen to that traffic, replicate it and send it somewhere else (to

Re: [vpp-dev] Port mirroring support in vpp

, 2018 3:20 AM To: Damjan Marion (damarion) ; Juraj Linkeš Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] Port mirroring support in vpp For VPP 18.01 and master, SPAN has been enhanced to allow port mirroring for interface in L2 mode such as ones in bridge domains. There is a “L2” argument added to

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP tap interface issue on Arm servers

buntu18.04 distro and I think Lijian is using something similar, if not the same. Juraj -Original Message- From: Benoit Ganne (bganne) Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 10:04 AM To: Lijian Zhang ; Dave Barach (dbarach) ; Damjan Marion Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Juraj Linkeš Subject: RE: [vpp-de

[vpp-dev] VPP Cross compilation (x86_64 -> aarch64)

Hi VPP Devs, I'm trying to understand how to implement support for cross compilation for aarch64. I've put together some changes that are finally cross compiling DPDK (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/vpp/+/21035/), but the compilation is failing when it doesn't find openssl headers: In file included

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Cross compilation (x86_64 -> aarch64)

it to be more suitable to the current environment. I also disabled the basic_system package installation, because it seemed like legacy code that was supplanted by make install-dep. Let me know if any of these is off the mark. Or anything else in the patch :) Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš Sent: F

Re: [vpp-dev] Change in vpp[master]: ebuild: Cross compilation aarch64 Ubuntu support

-deps make PLATFORM=aarch64-generic pkg-deb I repeated the procedure at my system – here is logs (if it helps...) https://gist.github.com/stanislav-chlebec/3042a0eeb56819aea8217dfaf5e60647 Thanks Stanislav From: Dave Barach (Code Review) mailto:ger...@fd.io>> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 20

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - performance tests failing on Taishan

Hi Benoit, Do you have access to FD.io lab? The Taishan servers are in it. Juraj -Original Message- From: Benoit Ganne (bganne) Sent: Friday, November 29, 2019 4:03 PM To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) ; Juraj Linkeš ; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) ; vpp

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - performance tests failing on Taishan

#x27; variable. More is attached. As a temporary workaround (until we fix this), we're going to replace show pci with something else in CSIT: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/csit/+/23785 Juraj -Original Message- From: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) Sent: Tuesd

Re: [vpp-dev] Change in vpp[master]: ebuild: Cross compilation aarch64 Ubuntu support

I looked into this and there are some problems. The first problem is the inability to fine tune any parameters we might want to for target cpu/microarchitecture (for arm, that would be building packages with specifics for ThunderX, McBin, Raspberry PI etc.). I'm not sure how Qemu does the emula

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - performance tests failing on Taishan

Hi Lijian, The patch helped, I can't reproduce the issue now. Thanks, Juraj -Original Message- From: Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China) Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 7:16 AM To: Juraj Linkeš ; Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) ; Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; M

Re: [vpp-dev] Change in vpp[master]: ebuild: Cross compilation aarch64 Ubuntu support

ation builds (see my previous e-mail for reasons why I think it's inadequate). Thanks, Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2019 3:36 PM To: dmar...@me.com; Benoit Ganne (bganne) Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Change in vpp[master]: ebuild: Cross compilation a

Re: [vpp-dev] Change in vpp[master]: ebuild: Cross compilation aarch64 Ubuntu support

e the qemu emulation is, how much of the current ebuild system should (or shouldn't) we use or do we need to do something completely different (that would presumably be a lot simpler). Thanks, Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 10:25 AM To: Juraj Linkeš ; dmar...@me.co

Re: [vpp-dev] Change in vpp[master]: ebuild: Cross compilation aarch64 Ubuntu support

I forgot to actually ask to add this item to the agenda - can we talk about this tomorrow? :) From: Juraj Linkeš Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 11:12 AM To: Dave Barach (dbarach) Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Change in vpp[master]: ebuild: Cross compilation aarch64 Ubuntu

Re: [vpp-dev] Help with creating patch

Hi folks, I've ran into the same issue when trying to submit a CSIT patch after upgrading my Debian distro (which also updated git review). It turns out that my git review (version 1.25.0) is using improper default gerrit namespace. From git review 1.27.0 release notes [0]: Update defau

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp_papi parsing failure while running make test on a Taishan ARM board

essed apifiles looks on a platform where the failure doesn't occur. @Ole: could you please verify that this is accurate? Thanks, Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš [mailto:juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2018 2:38 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [vpp-dev] vpp_papi parsing failur

[vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework

Hi VPP devs, I'm implementing parallel test execution of tests in VPP Test Framework (the patch is here https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13491/) and the last big outstanding question is how scalable the parallelization actually is. The tests are spawning one VPP instance per each VPPTestCase class an

Re: [vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework

econd solution? What it be possible? Thanks, Juraj From: Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) [mailto:mkons...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 1:10 PM To: Juraj Linkeš Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; csit-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework On 19 Jul 2018, at 15

Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework

nt: Saturday, July 28, 2018 1:28 PM To: Peter Mikus -X (pmikus - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Cc: Maciek Konstantynowicz ; Alec Hothan (ahothan) ; Juraj Linkeš ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework Dear All, My personal preferenc

[vpp-dev] Large memory spike during make verify on ARM machine ThunderX

Hi vpp-devs, I noticed that during a specific portion of make verify build on an ARM ThunderX machine the build consumes a lot of memory - around 25GB. I can identify the spot in the logs: Jul 31 03:12:48 CXX gbp_contract.lo 25GB memory hog Jul 31 03:16:13 CXXLDlibvom.la but not

Re: [vpp-dev] Large memory spike during make verify on ARM machine ThunderX

ease --build=aarch64-linux-gnu --host=aarch64-linux-gnu --target=aarch64-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) Thanks, Juraj From: Neale Ranns (nranns) [mailto:nra...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 1, 2018 5:09 PM To: Juraj Linkeš ;

Re: [vpp-dev] Large memory spike during make verify on ARM machine ThunderX

hat I could run make verify back to back without deleting and recloning the vpp repo? ccache -C didn't work for me. Thanks, Juraj From: Neale Ranns (nranns) [mailto:nra...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2018 11:11 AM To: Juraj Linkeš ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Large me

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-arm-verify-master-ubuntu1604 failing

n for why that's the case, since the tests worked fine before. Juraj From: Ed Kern (ejk) [mailto:e...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2018 11:54 PM To: Matthew Smith Cc: vpp-dev ; Juraj Linkeš Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp-arm-verify-master-ubuntu1604 failing On Sep 6, 2018,

[vpp-dev] Make test failures on ARM

Hi vpp-devs, Especially ARM vpp devs :) We're experiencing a number of failures on Cavium ThunderX and we'd like to fix the issues. I've created a number of Jira tickets: *GRE crash *SCTP failure/crash o

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ARM - IP4, L2, ECMP, Multicast, GRE, SCTP, SPAN, ACL

lt;https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1418> o I'm already working with Andrew on fixing this There seem to be a lot of people who touched the code. I would like to ask the authors to tell me who to turn to (at least for IP and L2). Regards, Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš [mailto:juraj.lin...@pant

Re: [vpp-dev] Make test failures on ARM - IP4, L2, ECMP, Multicast, GRE, SCTP, SPAN, ACL

not, could you suggest someone so I can ask them? Thanks, Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 10:07 AM To: 'Juraj Linkeš' ; vpp-dev Cc: csit-dev Subject: RE: Make test failures on ARM - IP4, L2, ECMP, Multicast, GRE, SCTP, SPAN, ACL I created the new tickets un

[vpp-dev] Faulty java version check for JVPP GEN

Hi vpp-devs, I'm trying to get VPP build (actually make verify for ci purposes) to run on Ubuntu1804 and I've hit an issue with java: checking /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-arm64 for Java 8 compiler... found version 11 ... /vpp/build-data/../extras/japi/java/jvpp-core/io/fd/vpp/jvpp/core/examples

[vpp-dev] VPP unit test failures (l2fib, ip4 reassemble) on environments other than x86 Ubuntu 1804

Hi vpp-devs, There are some failures in unit tests that have cropped up in master on ARM: *https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1475 *https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1476 I tried Ubuntu1604 and 1804 on ARM and the issues are reproducible on both. I've noticed that we switched testing fr

Re: [vpp-dev] Faulty java version check for JVPP GEN

There's actually a JIRA ticket opened for this, so it seems I'm not the only one who's looking for a solution: https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1477 Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš [mailto:juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech] Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 5:36 PM To: vpp-dev Cc: sirshak@

[vpp-dev] Unit test failures in master

Hi vpp-devs, There are a couple of make test failures in master: *IPv4 Reassembly - https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1475 o Just one test fails - random order reassembly, there are missing packets *L2 FIB - https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1476 o Multiple failures - the first tes

Re: [vpp-dev] Unit test failures in master

I've looked into these failure a bit more. Both of these failures produce a core with debug build, so I was able to do a bit of gdb debugging. I attached gdb logs to both tickets - please have a look. Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš [mailto:juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech] Sent: Wednesday, Novemb

Re: [vpp-dev] test-ext failures seen on master

This makes sense from my point. I've seen some tests fail with one of the builds but not with the other. This would obviously increase the demand for compute resources, but we could mitigate that with running tests in parallel (the TEST_JOBS variable). Juraj -Original Message- From: Kl

[vpp-dev] Enabling unit tests in VPP job for ARM and make test failures

Hi vpp-dev, As many of you already know, we tried enabling unit tests in ARM VPP jobs the last release cycle, but we only managed to fix all make test failures during release procedures and we agreed that enabling it would be better after 1810 is released. Enabling the unit testing (i.e. runni

Re: [vpp-dev] Enabling unit tests in VPP job for ARM and make test failures

patch that introduces test blacklisting: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16118/ I've also updated the corresponding CI patch (https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15251/) with the blacklist. What do you thing about this approach? Thanks, Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš [mailto:juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech] Sent: Frid

Re: [vpp-dev] Build failing on AArch64

oan [mailto:otr...@employees.org] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2018 9:26 AM To: Sirshak Das Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Honnappa Nagarahalli ; Juraj Linkeš ; Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China) Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Build failing on AArch64 Sirshak, Can you touch one of the .api files and rebuild with V=2 and

Re: [vpp-dev] Build failing on AArch64

s more you need - or you can try accessing one of our ThunderX's in the FD.io lab if you have access. Thanks, Juraj From: Ole Troan [mailto:otr...@employees.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 5:43 PM To: Juraj Linkeš Cc: Sirshak Das ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Honnappa Nagarahalli ; Lijian Zh

Re: [vpp-dev] Verify issues (GRE)

Hi Ole, I've noticed a few thing about the VCL testcases: -The VCL testcasess are all using the same ports, which makes them unsuitable for parallel test runs -Another thing about these testcases is that when they're don't finish properly the sock_test_server and client stay ru

Re: [vpp-dev] Build failing on AArch64

Hi Ole, I tried it and it does solve the issue, thanks! Sirshak, does it work for you too? Juraj From: Ole Troan [mailto:otr...@employees.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 9:25 AM To: Sirshak Das Cc: Juraj Linkeš ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Honnappa Nagarahalli ; Lijian Zhang (Arm

Re: [vpp-dev] Verify issues (GRE)

vember 29, 2018 5:04 PM To: Juraj Linkeš Cc: Ole Troan ; vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Verify issues (GRE) Hi Juraj, Those tests exercise the stack in vpp, so they don’t use up linux stack ports. Moreover, both cut-through and through-the-stack tests use self.shm_prefix when connecting to v

Re: [vpp-dev] String tests failures

Dave, I was able to verify that the fix works and thus removed the test from https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16282/. Thanks From: Dave Barach (dbarach) [mailto:dbar...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 2:52 PM To: Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China) Cc: Juraj Linkeš ; Damjan Marion

[vpp-dev] 2MB vs 1GB hugepages on ARM ThunderX

Hi folks, I've ran into an issue with hugepages on a Cavium ThunderX soc. I was trying to bind a physical interface to VPP. When using 1GB hugepages the interface seems to be working fine (well, at least I saw the interface in VPP and I was able to configure it and use ping with it), but when u

Re: [vpp-dev] 2MB vs 1GB hugepages on ARM ThunderX

Thanks Damjan. Nitin, Gorka, do you have any input on this? Juraj From: Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io [mailto:dmarion=me@lists.fd.io] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:21 PM To: Juraj Linkeš Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] 2MB vs 1GB hugepages on ARM ThunderX Dear Juraj

[vpp-dev] Enable arm vpp master testing in ci

Hello, We're trying to enable testing for vpp master on ARM in CI. Here's the patch: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15251/ All of the affected jobs have been tested in sandbox and are working well. Please review the patch and give it a +1 if you think it's okay so that Ed can finally merge it. Th

Re: [vpp-dev] 2MB vs 1GB hugepages on ARM ThunderX

shoudn't be an issue, but maybe that's a documentation overight. Juraj [0] https://doc.dpdk.org/guides-18.11/nics/thunderx.html From: Gorka Garcia [mailto:ggar...@marvell.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 11:03 AM To: Juraj Linkeš ; dmar...@me.com; Nitin Saxena Cc: vpp-dev

[vpp-dev] Ipv4 random reassembly failure on x86 and ARM

Hi Klement and vpp-dev, https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1522 fixed the issue with an assert we've been seeing with random reassembly, however, there's still some other failure in that test: https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1475 It seems that not all fragments are sent properly. The run documented in

Re: [vpp-dev] Ipv4 random reassembly failure on x86 and ARM

To: Juraj Linkeš Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Sirshak Das ; Lijian Zhang (Arm Technology China) ; Stanislav Chlebec Subject: Re: Ipv4 random reassembly failure on x86 and ARM Is this with https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16548/ merged? Quoting Juraj Linkeš (2018-12-20 12:09:12) >Hi Klemen

[vpp-dev] Enable all ARM tests

Hi folks, All of the remaining ARM failures have been fixed and now we need to enable the disabled tests for ARM CI: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16581/ https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/16569/ Could someone please merge these? They're simple changes and verify shows that the errors were, indeed, fixed.

Re: [vpp-dev] Jenkins ARM node broken?

Hi Ben, This is an intermittent failure not unique to any job - it happens pretty much randomly as far as I can. Try running the verify again (add "reverify" comment). Maybe Ed knows more details about this issue. Juraj -Original Message- From: Benoit Ganne (bganne) via Lists.Fd.Io [m

[vpp-dev] VPP Device jobs randomly failing

Hi Damjan, Benoit, In the CSIT call I've learned that you were looking into why VPP Device jobs sometimes fail. I'm working on adding VPP Device jobs for arm and we're seeing the same issue that's behind these random failures, possibly even more frequently. There are two high level observation

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Device jobs randomly failing

From: Damjan Marion (damarion) Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 5:06 PM To: Juraj Linkeš Cc: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; vpp-dev ; csit-...@lists.fd.io; Andrew Yourtchenko (ayourtch) Subject: Re: VPP Device jobs randomly failing On 25.11.2020., at 16:55, Juraj Linkeš mailto:juraj.lin...@pan

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Device jobs randomly failing

Updating to the latest PF version (2.13.10) did not help. I'm seeing the same failures. We'll tank about other options in the CSIT calls, things like whether it makes sense to try newer firmware or vfio-pci versions. Juraj From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Juraj Linkeš Sent:

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Device jobs randomly failing

.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2020 4:48 PM To: Juraj Linkeš Cc: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ; vpp-dev ; csit-...@lists.fd.io; Andrew Yourtchenko (ayourtch) Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Device jobs randomly failing I doubt changing anything around vfio-pci

[vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured VLAN with newer i40e drivers

Hi Damjan, vpp devs, Upgrading to 2.15.9 i40e driver in CI (from Ubuntu's 2.8.20-k) makes AVF interface creation on VFs with configured VLANs fail: 2021/08/30 09:15:27:343 debug avf :91:04.1: request_queues: num_queue_pairs 1 2021/08/30 09:15:27:434 debug avf :91:04.1: version: major 1 m

Re: [vpp-dev] IPSec input/output: default action for non-matching traffic

Hi Neale, Did you have a chance to look at this? For my part, I'm trying to figure out how to configure VPP with two DPDK interfaces where I would send bidirectional traffic (unencrypted, since the traffic generator in question (T-rex) can't send encrypted traffic yet) and I'd match an input ru

Re: [vpp-dev] IPSec input/output: default action for non-matching traffic

A correction, I meant inbound rule, not input rule. Juraj From: Juraj Linkeš Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 10:59 AM To: 'Zachary Leaf' ; 'ne...@graphiant.com' Cc: vpp-dev Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] IPSec input/output: default action for non-matching traffic Hi Neale, D

Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured VLAN with newer i40e drivers

From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 12:01 PM To: Juraj Linkeš Cc: vpp-dev ; Lijian Zhang Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured VLAN with newer i40e drivers On 09.09.2021., at 09:14

Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured VLAN with newer i40e drivers

> -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Damjan Marion > via lists.fd.io > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2021 5:54 PM > To: Juraj Linkeš > Cc: vpp-dev ; Lijian Zhang > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured

Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured VLAN with newer i40e drivers

> -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Juraj Linkeš > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:43 AM > To: damar...@cisco.com > Cc: vpp-dev ; Lijian Zhang > Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] AVF interface creation fails on VFs with configured > VLAN >

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP IPSec Related Doubts

Hi Hrishikesh, The API has changed, try without the hyphen: ipsec sa add 10 spi 1000 esp tunnel src 192.168.1.1 tunnel dst 192.168.1.2 crypto-key 4339314b55523947594d6d3547666b45 crypto-alg aes-cbc-128 integ-key 4339314b55523947594d6d3547666b45 integ-alg sha1-96 Regards, Juraj From: vpp-dev@li