Dear Matus
Unfortunately we can not assign two vrf to an interface.
Is there another way to implement my requirement?
Regards,
Khers
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> You can translate to different addresses only pa
Hi,
Is this the multiple outside interfaces use case?
As you can see from the table in the wiki that’s not implemented yet
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/NAT
Cheers
Ole
> On 6 Jan 2019, at 15:34, emma sdi wrote:
>
> Dear Matus
>
> Unfortunately we can not assign two vrf to an interface.
> Is
Hi,
Your requirement is not supported currently. Maybe you can implement it using
NAT as output feature and write your own address and port allocation function.
Matus
From: khers
Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2019 3:35 PM
To: Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: vpp-de
Hi,
Could you please provide packet trace?
Matus
-Original Message-
From: Carlito Nueno
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 10:34 PM
To: Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Question regarding captive portal
Hi Matus,
Hi,
Do you receive at least IPfix templates on collector?
Matus
From: khers
Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2019 8:58 AM
To: Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] [vpp-dev] IPFIX Nat Logging
Hi,
I tried that but I didn't get any log