show interface command at the beginning :
vpp# show interface
Name Idx State Counter
Count
TenGigabitEthernet21/0/0 5 up rx packets
6146
rx bytes
David,
Can you enable trace “trace add dpdk-input 10” and send a few packets, then do
“show trace”?
Cheers,
Ole
> On 18 Dec 2018, at 09:05, david.leitch@gmail.com wrote:
>
> show interface command at the beginning :
>
> vpp# show interface
> Name Idx Sta
# vpp show trace
[...]
--- Start of thread 16 vpp_wk_15 ---
Packet 1
00:00:02:897486: dpdk-input
TenGigabitEthernet4/0/0 rx queue 15
buffer 0x25507a1: current data 14, length 46, free-list 0, clone-count 0,
totlen-nifb 0, trace 0x0
ext-hdr-
vpp# show interface rx-placement
Thread 1 (vpp_wk_0):
node dpdk-input:
TenGigabitEthernet4/0/0 queue 0 (polling)
TenGigabitEthernet4/0/1 queue 0 (polling)
TenGigabitEthernet7/0/0 queue 0 (polling)
TenGigabitEthernet7/0/1 queue 0 (polling)
TenGigabitEthernet21/0/0 queue 0 (pol
What is your VPP version?
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of
david.leitch@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 9:26 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Config NAT plugin for with dynamic translations
vpp# show interface rx-placement
Thread 1 (vpp_wk_0):
nod
I used VPP18.04
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11658): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11658
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28790237/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-d
Please try to use 18.10
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of
david.leitch@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 9:43 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Config NAT plugin for with dynamic translations
I used VPP18.04
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive al
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:51 PM Marco Varlese wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 20:19 -0800, Brian Dickson wrote:
>
> Hi, VPP folks,
>
> I am trying to add in support for a new card/driver.
>
> The info on the DPDK website says the drivers I have should work fine.
>
> Thus, the only i
Hi Matus,
There must be some misunderstanding!
We're discussing endpoint INdependent mapping which as far as I know isn't
currently present in VPP.
The issue being that the current NAT implementations break certain services as
clients end up with different external IPs in various situations wher
Endpoint independent mapping is default behaviour
Matus
From: John Biscevic
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 10:03 AM
To: Ole Troan ; Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Sanity check re: NAT for same-service mapping
Hi Ma
Hi Damjan,
My fault that I should have made it clear. What I want to say is that I wonder
if the existing handoff mechanism needs some improvement. Using a ring seems to
be simpler, and better from performance perspective. Even more, I think it
could help with the packet drop issue due to bigge
Hi Avinash,
My question about the MP/MC ring flag that you made a patch to DPDK, any
comments?
I’d like them to be MP/SC, as we always have only one consumer.
Regards,
Kingwel
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Gonsalves, Avinash
(Nokia - IN/Bangalore)
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:
Possibly, do you have any numbers to support your statement?
--
Damjan
> On 18 Dec 2018, at 10:14, Kingwel Xie wrote:
>
> Hi Damjan,
>
> My fault that I should have made it clear. What I want to say is that I
> wonder if the existing handoff mechanism needs some improvement. Using a ring
vpp 18.04 NAT plugin has bug or it does not work ???
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11666): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11666
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/28790237/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io
Uns
We had done this a while back, I was checking the code if I had missed out
anything.
I agree this can be a MP/SC. I’ve not tested this, but let me get back with
some test results.
Thanks,
Avinash
From: Kingwel Xie
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 2:47 PM
To: Gonsalves, Avinash (Nokia - IN/Bang
I think this is issue when handoff queue is congested (multiple workers), this
was fixed in 18.10
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of
david.leitch@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 10:36 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Config NAT plugin for with dynamic
Hi Matus,
That is... Interesting. Is the behaviour dependent on the presence of STUN
packets?
Sincerely,
John
Sent from my phone
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:08 AM +0100, "Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" mailto:matfa...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Endpoint independent ma
Session/mapping key is 4-tuple (client address, port, fib index and protocol),
internal address and port is mapped always to same external address and port no
matter what is the endpoint
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/gitweb?p=vpp.git;a=blob;f=src/plugins/nat/nat.h;h=3ce83ea26022fac43045fc88bfb37466c78c
VPP Version : v18.07.1
DPDK Version: DPDK 18.05.0
# vppctl show pci
:01:00.0 14e4:165f 5.0 GT/s x1 uio_pci_generic Broadcom NetXtreme
Gigabit Ether PN: BCM95720
EC: 106679-15
We never added support for those cards, simply because we don't have them...
--
Damjan
> On 18 Dec 2018, at 11:14, Nixon Raj via Lists.Fd.Io
> wrote:
>
> VPP Version : v18.07.1
> DPDK Version: DPDK 18.05.0
>
>
> # vppctl show pci
>
> :01:00.0 14e4:165f 5.0 GT/s x1 uio_pci_gen
Unfortunately no. However we did suffer from the packet drop issue due to queue
full, when system load is not heavy. In the end we discovered some vectors in
the queue only have very few buffers in them. And if we increased the queue
size, drop rate goes down.
We have a dpdk ring based mechanis
Hello all,
I am trying out PPPoE with VPP and while seaching for its
configuration I found the following thread
https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10844 which kind of suggests
that the currently PPPoE is broken and that the code must be moved to
tapv2.
The problem people get is that packets f
What kind of nic do you have? Can you capture "show hardw" ?
--
Damjan
> On 18 Dec 2018, at 04:03, mik...@yeah.net wrote:
>
> Hi,
>I configured 2 worker thread and 2 dpdk rx-queuein startup.conf . Then I
> forged 400w packets and send them to a single dpdk interface . It turns out
> that
Hi Matus,
Brilliant, thanks!
However, then isn't it possible for a client to end up exposing two different
external IPs to an endpoint if the client opens two separate sessions over two
different ports?
John
Sent from my phone
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:28 AM +, "Matus Fabian -X (matf
When external address used in first session has allocated all available ports
second session use another external address if it is available (when you have 2
external addresses nat start using first and when all ports are allocated it
moves to second one)
Matus
From: John Biscevic
Sent: Tues
Hi Matus,
Thanks, that's how I figured that it works, and was the root of my concern and
the idea of reserving ports for a client equivalent to max translations per
user to avoid such scenarios. It's potentially wasteful but a fail-safe against
such scenarios.
Much appreciated that you've take
For folks in the FD.io community looking to submit talks to the Kubecon EU
CFP:
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/kubecon-cloudnativecon-europe-2019/cfp/
It closes Jan 18.
Ed
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11684): https://
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 5:50 AM Ole Troan wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> > Is it your intention to re-factor the changes in
> > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/14247
> > to remove the FIB DPO and instead use an input feature?
>
> Yes, that was the plan.
> Of course we could keep the DPO code in there, and even
What version of VPP do you use.
I'm missing some outputs in "show hardware"...
--
Damjan
> On 19 Dec 2018, at 02:19, mik...@yeah.net wrote:
>
> The "show hardw" is as follow, the statistics may be different from yesterday.
>
> vpp# show hardware-interfaces
> Name Idx Link Hardware
> VirtualF
*hi*
*Every time I enable ipfix for NAT, the main thread (vpp_main) is going too
slowly, which is very hard to enter any command and also drop rate increase
that all traffic dropped.*
*but I got worker thread deadlock once after some hours.
* *Is it a normal behavior that Every time I enable ip
Can you try to capture "show hardw" with 18.10 ?
Looks like ThunderX is not acting as PCI device so part of the output is
suppressed in 18.07 and we changed that behaviour in 18.10.
I'm looking for someething like:
rss avail: ipv4 ipv4-tcp ipv4-udp ipv6 ipv6-tcp ipv6-udp ipv6-tcp-ex
31 matches
Mail list logo
