Hi all,
ping 192.168.123.2 -s 6000 from 192.168.123.3 that out of remote
vxlan-tunnel-endpoint failed when the NAT44 config was added!
And not NAT44 -> correct; add NAT44 -> faild!
Who can help? Maybe, this is a bug.
#
set int state T
Hi,
Could you please provide packet trace?
Matus
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:54 AM
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] NAT44 && VXLAN tunnel && ip reassembly && ip frag can not
work correctly at vpp stable/1810
Hi all,
ping 192.168.123.2 -s 60
No, it's on my laptop and out of 16g mem, 11g is caches so there
shouldn't be any OOM issue there.
Unless you change TEST_JOBS option (setting it to either auto or ), the test framework still runs 1 job at a time.
Klement
Quoting Florin Coras (2018-11-15 22:16:05)
> That’s an interesting failure
clang can format the macros just fine as they are. I added clang for
checking the style of c++ code (mainly vapi code). C files are still
checked using indent, which doesn't understand the macros ... Also I
wasn't able to come up with a clang-format which matches the current
indent style 1:1 so I d
Congratulations Andrew!!!
On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 16:43 +, Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
> The TSC formally approved Andrew’s vpp committer nomination a short while ago.
>
> Congratulations, and thanks in advance for your participation as a committer.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> On 16 Nov 2018, at 02:02, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
>
> I just discovered the clang-format file and noticed that Linux kernel used
> the ForEachMacros option to format for() wrappers.
>
> VPP seems to be riddled with INDENT-OFF when it does vector loops. (2123
> times!)
> Has anyone looke
Dear Mr/Miss/Ms ：
I am Baojing Ni, working in FIBERHOME TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES Co.,Ltd
I have a question to consult :
Do you have the plan about FRR（fast re-routing） MPLS traffic engineering in
VPP ?
I am looking forward for your answers.
Thank you.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
L
Hello eveyone,
I need some information about VPP. I have a server side and client side. Also I
use VPP as load balancer. When client send request to server, server view load
baloancer(VPP)' s IP address but * I want to view client's IP* that send
request to server. I use load balancer plugin. Is
I've also noticed that quite often a binary called sock_test_client is
left running after a vpp crash or test failure. What's worse, it eats
100% CPU.
Quoting Florin Coras (2018-11-16 00:40:06)
>Thanks, Dave!
>I’ll take a look at those as soon as I can. I’m running multiple
>connection
[Edited Message Follows]
Hello eveyone,
I need some information about VPP. I have a server side and client side. Also I
use VPP as load balancer. When client send request to server, server view load
baloancer(VPP)' s IP address but * I want to view client's IP* that send
request to server. I us
Nexus(?) backend to nginx is reporting down.
Resolution time?
Cheers,
-Maciek
[cid:876751CF-C733-46B9-9A07-8298C0A0A0C8@cisco.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#11286): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11286
Mute This Topic:
Hi,
We do not support FRR, nor is there currently a plan to.
However, if your label/tunnel/route has only one path, you can achieve a
similar result to FRR by installing the primary path with a better (lower)
preference to the backup path. VPP will then cutover when the primary path goes
down
> We do not support FRR, nor is there currently a plan to.
Although you can run FRR with VPP.
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/wiki/Alternate-forwarding-planes:-VPP
Cheers,
Ole
>
> However, if your label/tunnel/route has only one path, you can achieve a
> similar result to FRR by installing t
Hi vpp-dev,
As many of you already know, we tried enabling unit tests in ARM VPP jobs the
last release cycle, but we only managed to fix all make test failures during
release procedures and we agreed that enabling it would be better after 1810 is
released.
Enabling the unit testing (i.e. runni
Ok. Thanks I didn't want to head down the dead end
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 2:09 AM Damjan Marion
>
> > On 16 Nov 2018, at 02:02, Stephen Hemminger
> wrote:
> >
> > I just discovered the clang-format file and noticed that Linux kernel
> used
> > the ForEachMacros option to format for() wrappers.
>
I also noticed that although it shouldn’t be different from the vcl test apps
which seem to be properly killed on test failure. Anyway, it’s on my todo list,
if nobody beats me to it.
Florin
> On Nov 16, 2018, at 5:27 AM, Klement Sekera wrote:
>
> I've also noticed that quite often a binary c
Maciek,
We're looking into this now.
On Fri Nov 16 09:02:19 2018, mackonstan wrote:
> Nexus(?) backend to nginx is reporting down.
> Resolution time?
>
> Cheers,
> -Maciek
>
> [cid:876751CF-C733-46B9-9A07-8298C0A0A0C8@cisco.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent t
Apparently, we have an issue with an upstream network provider which is
impacting some of our CI services.
We're working on getting more information including an ETA if possible. I'll
send a notification to the community as well.
Thank you,
Vanessa
On Fri Nov 16 10:18:59 2018, valderrv wrote:
I'll see if I can reproduce the issue.
I seem to recall some python test code which was supposed to detect that
condition and clean up, but I don't think that I ever verified that it
worked.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 11/16/2018 11:44 AM, Florin Coras wrote:
I also noticed that although it shouldn’t
The hardware has been replace and services have been restored. Thank you for
your patience. Please open an RT ticket is you are experiencing any issues.
helpd...@fd.io
Thank you,
Vanessa
On Fri Nov 16 10:26:44 2018, valderrv wrote:
> Apparently, we have an issue with an upstream network provide
Hi VPP-Dev,
Can we use memif without attaching to Eth/IP layers.
This will avoid the need of implementing eth/IP layers on a
non-VPP-application, if it needs to communicate to a VPP app via memif.
This may need development of a memif mode "RAW", which just reads the packets
and pushes it onto a
Hehe, wrong TLA mapping.
See Neale’s response.
Cheers
Ole
> On 17 Nov 2018, at 07:08, 倪宝景 wrote:
>
> HI，
> https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/wiki/Alternate-forwarding-planes:-VPP
> This wiki offers us the FRR is "free range routing",not "fast re-routing".
> The “fast re-routing” is a method
22 matches
Mail list logo
