Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Memory usage

Hi dear Andrew I once again ran previous scenario and logged previous outputs plus "vppctl show acl memory". I also send you T-rex configs, 60s and 1500s output. As you can see during this period RSS is increasing and Total-rx is decreasing. I assume I didn't get my answer. Why does my Total-rx

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT - sw_interface_set_flags admin-up link-up failing

> then this issue was fixed It was not fixed, we have just listed VPP-1361 as a known issue [2] and performed more job runs to compensate for failures. Vratko. [2] https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1807/report/vpp_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html -Original Message- From: vpp-dev@lis

Re: [vpp-dev] num-mbufs

> On 20 Aug 2018, at 23:44, Bly, Mike wrote: > > Hello, > > I am looking to understand the math and reasoning behind the 16K DPDK MBUFs > per socket allocation. It is more educated guess than reasoning and math. > > From: vpp/src/plugins/dkdp/device/dpdk.h > > #define NB_MBUF (16<<10

Re: [vpp-dev] GoVPP is incompatible with vpp 18.07 #vpp #govpp #binapi

> I am trying to generate binary API's using latest GoVPP with 18.07 VPP JSON. > I get the following error > > binapi-generator --input-dir=/home/akshay/vpp1807json/vpp/api/core/ > --output-dir=./ > • We get the following error > > panic: Unknown VPP type vl_api_address_family

Re: [vpp-dev] GoVPP is incompatible with vpp 18.07 #vpp #govpp #binapi

Hey, You are most likely not running the latest GoVPP (I can see ”generator.go" file in your panic output which does not exist in latest version). The support for enums/unions along with some larger refactor of GoVPP was recently (4 days ago) merged into master. Here's change on gerrit: https:

[vpp-dev] TCP retransmission

Hello, all I am now debugging an issue observed in echo server/client. If nclients == small number, then everything goes smoothly, but if nclients is big, such as 500, 1000, echo client will hang without printing final report, and debug shows that echo client is waiting for response from server

Re: [vpp-dev] GoVPP is incompatible with vpp 18.07 #vpp #govpp #binapi

Thank you so much. With the latest GoVPP I am able to generate the Binary-API bindings. Initially I got the below error (Some issue with the parsing)  *Invalid EVENTS SERVICE: {RequestType:dhcp_client_config ReplyType:dhcp_client_config_reply Stream:false Events:[dhcp_compl_event]}* but I was abl

[vpp-dev] Cavium ThunderX (ARM64) - Crash in VPP (Kubernetes + Contiv-VPP network plugin)

Hello all Could you please help mi with this issue: https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-1394 Thanks. Stan -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#10235): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/10235 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/24876710

Re: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [vpp-dev] num-mbufs

Marion, Thank you for the feedback. This should give me enough to scratch out some basic rules for our system. Much appreciated! -Mike From: Damjan Marion Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2018 1:49 AM To: Bly, Mike Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] Re: [vpp-dev] num-mbufs On 20 Au

Re: [vpp-dev] Cavium ThunderX (ARM64) - Crash in VPP (Kubernetes + Contiv-VPP network plugin)

Hi Stan, What route were you adding at the time? Can you give me the post-mortem API dump [1] /neale [1] see https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/BugReports From: on behalf of Stanislav Chlebec Date: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 16:41 To: Nitin Saxena , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [vpp-dev] Cavi

Re: [vpp-dev] TCP retransmission

Hi Ping, Just from this, I can’t tell precisely what the issue is. Once the test hangs, do “show session verbose 2” and you should get the detailed status of the sessions that froze. I’ll take a look at those once I’m back in the office. Retransmissions should work fine but one never knows. On

[vpp-dev] VPP 18.10 Release Plan

All, During today VPP project meeting call it has been discussed about the release milestones for 18.10. The release plan and agreed schedule can be found at the release wiki-page: https://wiki.fd.io/view/Projects/vpp/Release_Plans/Release_Plan_18.10 Starting from today, I would like to start ga

Re: [vpp-dev] GoVPP is incompatible with vpp 18.07 #vpp #govpp #binapi

Hey, You are most likely not running the latest GoVPP (I can see ”generator.go" file in your panic output which does not exist in latest version). The support for enums/unions along with some larger refactor of GoVPP was recently (4 days ago) merged into master. Here's change on gerrit: https

[vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

Hello, I have some questions regarding Destination Options processing in VPP. Basically, I'd like to know they are properly supported per RFC8200. I not, then I'd like to request the VPP stack is fixed to be protocol compliant in this. This came up in regard to a discussion on IETF 6man list. It

Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

Hi Tom and welcome to vpp-dev, > On 21 Aug 2018, at 16:28, Tom Herbert wrote: > > Hello, > > I have some questions regarding Destination Options processing in VPP. > Basically, I'd like to know they are properly supported per RFC8200. Probably not. > I > not, then I'd like to request the VP

Re: [vpp-dev] GoVPP is incompatible with vpp 18.07 #vpp #govpp #binapi

It’s no error. It’s just kind of warning that this service is non-common one. It’s simple request and contains event registration as well. Maybe I should edit the warning message so this is obvious. Is the rest working for you well? Ondrej -- [https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool

Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

-- Damjan > On 21 Aug 2018, at 18:51, Tom Herbert wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Damjan Marion > wrote: >> >> Hi Tom and welcome to vpp-dev, >> >> >>> On 21 Aug 2018, at 16:28, Tom Herbert wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have some questions regarding

Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:24 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: > > Hi Tom and welcome to vpp-dev, > > >> On 21 Aug 2018, at 16:28, Tom Herbert wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have some questions regarding Destination Options processing in VPP. >> Basically, I'd like to know they are properly supported per RFC

Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

+ Daniel Voyer +Daniel Bernier On 08/21/2018 12:24 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: Hi Tom and welcome to vpp-dev, On 21 Aug 2018, at 16:28, Tom Herbert wrote: Hello, I have some questions regarding Destination Options processing in VPP. Basically, I'd like to know they are prope

Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

Tom, If a Destination Option appears before a Routing header, the Destination Option header is ignored (packet is NOT dropped). If you think its relevant to implement the Destination Option header option types 01, 10 and 11, please open a Jira ticket for it. [1] Thanks, Pablo. [1] http

Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

Thomas, AFAIC, the SRv6 code is compliant both with RFC8200 and the segment routing drafts. The VPP support for Destination Options header is independent from SR. Thanks, Pablo. From: on behalf of Thomas F Herbert Date: Tuesday, 21 August 2018 at 19:15 To: "dmar...@me.com" , Tom Herbert Cc:

Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote: > + Daniel Voyer > > +Daniel Bernier > > > On 08/21/2018 12:24 PM, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: > > Hi Tom and welcome to vpp-dev, > > > On 21 Aug 2018, at 16:28, Tom Herbert wrote: > > Hello, > > I have some questions regarding De

Re: [vpp-dev] Destination Options processing in VPP

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) wrote: > Tom, > > > > If a Destination Option appears before a Routing header, the Destination > Option header is ignored (packet is NOT dropped). > > If you think its relevant to implement the Destination Option header option > types 01,