Hello all
I'm new to VPP so please bear with my ignorance in its
architecture/internals/development process :).
I'd like to ask for some change regarding DPDK plugin - to be specific
to differentiate between "device index" (in device table) and "device
id" (the DPDK port ID). More information ab
Hi,
In default configuration of vpp on single core, everything seems ok but
when I want to get the most out of my hardware resources and modify vpp
startup config, it crashes at some stages.
Here is some carshes:
1- I set interface's IP and then when I plugged cables in ports, It
suddenly carshes a
Hi Steven,
GDB shows that the vlib_process_get_events function always return ~0, except
one time at start and lacp_schedule_periodic_timer is never runs after that.
It's looks the same on both sides.
I have added some debug info. Please look at the log:
### VPP1:9.58 ###
Hi,
We are facing an issue during usage of API framework.
We have open a Non-blocking connection from Client app.
If Client does not have any pending request then it skip reading the
responses in vapi_dispatch . Please suggest
vapi_error_e
vapi_dispatch (vapi_ctx_t ctx)
{
vapi_error_e rv = VA
What exactly is the issue? According to vapi_dispatch() docstring this
is expected:
/**
* @brief loop vapi_dispatch_one until responses to all currently
outstanding
* requests have been received and their callbacks called
*
* @note the dispatch loop is interrupted if any error is encountered
o
interesting, works fine for me on c3000, but i use vfio.
Try with vfio, either with enabling iommu or using noiommu mode (kernel
4.4+)
--
Damjan
> On 17 Aug 2018, at 03:22, carlito nueno wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to bond two Intel 82599 on Intel Atom C3000. But I am
> getting uio_i
Hi Klement,
Thanks for your reply!
The exact problem statement is , we are trying to send some events from VPP
to client app , but client is not able to read those events api messages
until it has some pending requests. So as a work-around we are sending
control ping after few seconds from client
Are you on some old vpp version?
We did recently what i think you are asking for, port_id is now decoupled from
device_index...
--
Damjan
> On 17 Aug 2018, at 10:15, Andrzej Ostruszka wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> I'm new to VPP so please bear with my ignorance in its
> architecture/internals/d
Hi Chetan,
I think that in this case it's better to use blocking interface, as you
are waiting for the events to come.
You can take a look at test/ext/vapi_c_test.c - tests called
test_stats_1, _2 & _3 deal with stats - first two show a blocking,
efficient interface, third one is non-blocking, w
Thanks a lot Klement.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Klement Sekera wrote:
> Hi Chetan,
>
> I think that in this case it's better to use blocking interface, as you
> are waiting for the events to come.
>
> You can take a look at test/ext/vapi_c_test.c - tests called
> test_stats_1, _2 & _3 dea
Please refer to https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/BugReports for bug reporting, also
https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Configuration_Tool
If you expect folks to volunteer to help you: write up your system
configuration, vpp version and configuration, and so forth to a reasonable
standard.
From: vpp-dev@li
On 17.08.2018 14:07, Damjan Marion wrote:
> Are you on some old vpp version?
>
> We did recently what i think you are asking for, port_id is now
> decoupled from device_index...
Oh shoot! Yes indeed our client is using older version of VPP - my bad
I should have checked current version.
Now I'v
Hi,
We have a heavy node that does lots of packet field modifications (like encap
tunnels) and is the next node for dpdk-input.
This node is followed by another node and outputs the packet to the dpdk-output
node.
We are observing some packet corruption in case we have more than 1 interface
co
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:39 AM, Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Max_frag value is applied when fragments arrived out of order
>
Ahhh That wasn't clear... But I see...
> (non-initial fragments arrive before first fragment which contains L4
> header),
Aleksander,
I found the CLI bug. You can easily workaround with it. Please set the physical
interface state up first in your CLI sequence and it will work.
create bond mode lacp load-balance l23
bond add BondEthernet0 GigabitEtherneta/0/0
bond add BondEthernet0 GigabitEtherneta/0/1
set interface
Here is the system characteristics:
==
NODE: DUT1
CPU:
Model name:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
CPU(s):16
Thread(s) per core:2
Core(s) per socket:8
Socket(s):1
NUMA node0 CPU(s):0-15
16 matches
Mail list logo