Re: [vpp-dev] memif - packet memory interface

> On 17 Feb 2017, at 06:30, Zhou, Danny wrote: > > Very Interesting... > > Damjan, > > Do you think if it makes sense to use virtio_user/vhost_user pairs to connect > two VPPs instances running > inside two container? > > Essentially, the memif and virtio_user/vhost_user pairs both leverage

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] [dpdk-announce] DPDK 17.02 released

VPP is already on dpdk 17.02 since yesterday evening. Folks can do “make dpdk-install-dev” to upgrade development package in existing workspaces. > On 15 Feb 2017, at 17:35, Dave Wallace wrote: > > Congrats to the DPDK folks for the 17.02 release! > > Time to start integrating it into VPP/CS

[vpp-dev] avoiding spoof protection for BFD ECHO packets

Hi guys, BFD echo function allows testing datapaths only and thus using more aggresive rates and faster detection by using packets, which are processed only by the sender and simply looped back by the receiver. Each peer declares the willingness/rate at which it will loop back echo packets and eac

Re: [vpp-dev] avoiding spoof protection for BFD ECHO packets

> On 17 Feb 2017, at 14:07, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES > at Cisco) wrote: > > Hi guys, > > BFD echo function allows testing datapaths only and thus using more > aggresive rates and faster detection by using packets, which are > processed only by the sender and simply lo

Re: [vpp-dev] avoiding spoof protection for BFD ECHO packets

Quoting Damjan Marion (damarion) (2017-02-17 14:30:05) > > > On 17 Feb 2017, at 14:07, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON > > TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > BFD echo function allows testing datapaths only and thus using more > > aggresive rates and faster detection b

Re: [vpp-dev] avoiding spoof protection for BFD ECHO packets

> On 17 Feb 2017, at 14:38, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES > at Cisco) wrote: > > Quoting Damjan Marion (damarion) (2017-02-17 14:30:05) >> >>> On 17 Feb 2017, at 14:07, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON >>> TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> BFD

Re: [vpp-dev] avoiding spoof protection for BFD ECHO packets

For IPv6 I would probably just have picked a separate IPv6 address for BFD and installed an entry for it in the FIB. For IPv4... well you mistake me for someone who cares. ;-) Cheers, Ole > On 17 Feb 2017, at 14:07, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES > at Cisco) wrote: > > Hi

[vpp-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of IPv6 FIB

Hello VPP dev team, Usage of reset_fib API command to reset IPv6 FIB leads to incorrect entry in the FIB and to crash of VPP. Could somebody have a look on Jira ticket https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-643, please? Thanks, Jan >From make test log: 12:14:51,710 API: reset_fib ({'vrf_id': 1, 'is_i

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] [dpdk-announce] DPDK 17.02 released

Excellent -- thanks for the quick update Damjan! -daw- On 02/17/2017 04:36 AM, Damjan Marion wrote: VPP is already on dpdk 17.02 since yesterday evening. Folks can do “make dpdk-install-dev” to upgrade development package in existing workspaces. On 15 Feb 2017, at 17:35, Dave Wallace

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of IPv6 FIB

Hi Jan, What version of VPP are you testing? Thanks, neale From: on behalf of "Jan Gelety -X (jgelety - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" Date: Friday, 17 February 2017 at 14:48 To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Cc: "csit-...@lists.fd.io" Subject: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] reset_fib API issue in case of

Re: [vpp-dev] SNAT API Question

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > Hi Jon, > > > > snat_static_mapping_dump list only static mappings with resolved outside > address so snat_static_mapping_details doesn’t contain > external_sw_if_index. But we missing read API

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP-540 : pbb tag rewrite details

Please fix merge conflict(s) in https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4715/5 Thanks… Dave From: Andrej Macak -X (amacak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Sent: Friday, February 17, 2017 9:34 AM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Cc: michal.janc...@pantheon.tech; Dave Barach (dbarach) ; Pavel Kotucek -X (pkotucek - PA

Re: [vpp-dev] Interesting perf test results from Red Hat's test team

Hi Karl Can you also tell which version of DPDK you were using for OVS and for VPP (for VPP is it the one bundled with 17.01?). “The pps is the bi-directional sum of the packets received back at the traffic generator.” Just to make sure…. If your traffic gen sends 1 Mpps to each of the 2 inte

[vpp-dev] How do I create a igb_uio module on Centos

Hi, I am trying to follow the procedures on https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Build,_install,_and_test_images and https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/How_To_Connect_A_PCI_Interface_To_VPP but I end up with no igb_uio module; so I cannot # modprobe igb_uio and that seems to correspond to - *vpp-dpdk-dkms* -

Re: [vpp-dev] SNAT API Question

If external_sw_if_index value is ~0 (-1) external_ip_address is ussed from API (snat.c line 363). snat_add_address_range – add address range to SNAT address pool snat_add_del_interface_addr – add address of the interface to SNAT address pool (address is added/removed automatically when interface