don't want this ARP request, the 173.2.0.1 is a
inner ip, VPP may could not get that ARP response.
Best Rregards
Dave
发件人: Neale Ranns (nranns)
发送时间: 2019年8月23日 15:18
收件人: shi dave ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
主题: Re: 回复: 回复: 回复: [vpp-dev] Add ip route
, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : 回复: 回复: 回复: [vpp-dev] Add ip route without next-hop-address
Hi Neale,
sorry, clerical error, the flow is
dpdk-input
ip4-input (GigabitEthernet0/b/0)
ip4-lookup
ip4-rewrite (GigabitEthernet0/a/0)
ipsec-output-ip4
dpdk-esp-encrypt
dpdk-crypto-input
ip4-lo
Dave
发件人: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io 代表 shi dave
发送时间: 2019年8月23日 15:03
收件人: Neale Ranns (nranns) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
主题: 回复: 回复: [vpp-dev] Add ip route without next-hop-address
Hi Neale,
When routing to GigabitEthernet0/a/0, it could run into ipsec-output-ip4
-dev@lists.fd.io
主题: Re: 回复: [vpp-dev] Add ip route without next-hop-address
Hi Dave,
When routing to GigabitEthernet0/a/0 what destination MAC address should the
packet have?
/neale
De : shi dave
Date : vendredi 23 août 2019 à 05:01
À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-
Hi Dave,
When routing to GigabitEthernet0/a/0 what destination MAC address should the
packet have?
/neale
De : shi dave
Date : vendredi 23 août 2019 à 05:01
À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : 回复: [vpp-dev] Add ip route without next-hop-address
Hi Neale,
yes, it's a correct behavior for VPP ARP for 173.2.0.1, but in my case,
173.2.0.1 is a inner ip(src 173.10.10.10, dst 173.2.0.1), the outer ip is IPSEC
tunnel ip(src 172.16.3.15, dst 172.16.3.1), so that's no sense to get the mac
of 173.2.0.1.
so is there have any method to route the
