Hi Dave, When routing to GigabitEthernet0/a/0 what destination MAC address should the packet have?
/neale De : shi dave <dave....@outlook.com> Date : vendredi 23 août 2019 à 05:01 À : "Neale Ranns (nranns)" <nra...@cisco.com>, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> Objet : 回复: [vpp-dev] Add ip route without next-hop-address Hi Neale, yes, it's a correct behavior for VPP ARP for 173.2.0.1, but in my case, 173.2.0.1 is a inner ip(src 173.10.10.10, dst 173.2.0.1), the outer ip is IPSEC tunnel ip(src 172.16.3.15, dst 172.16.3.1), so that's no sense to get the mac of 173.2.0.1. so is there have any method to route the packet from GigabitEthernet0/b/0 to GigabitEthernet0/a/0, without send any ARP request? Best Rregards Dave ________________________________ 发件人: Neale Ranns (nranns) <nra...@cisco.com> 发送时间: 2019年8月22日 22:03 收件人: shi dave <dave....@outlook.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io> 主题: Re: [vpp-dev] Add ip route without next-hop-address Hi Dave, but from the trace, it send a ARP request to ask 173.2.0.1 directly ip4-lookup -> ip4-glean -> GigabitEthernet0/a/0-output -> ip4-glean: ARP requests sent how could I avoid this ARP request, like ? ip4-lookup -> ip4-rewrite (GigabitEthernet0/a/0) -> ipsec-output-ip4 VPP is ARPing for 173.2.0.1. What do you want it to do instead? neale
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13827): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/13827 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/32997382/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
