RO at Cisco)
> Cc: t...@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ;
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Scapy license in VPP
>
> This is good information.
>
> Can we take a step back and approach this from a different perspective? Why
> do we actually need scapy?
> The ge
t/blob/624e580159dc056035d7e962582e86a000f8c3d6/GPL/traffic_scripts/send_ip_check_headers.py#L35
From: Paul Vinciguerra
Sent: Thursday, 2021-February-04 17:05
To: Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
Cc: t...@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ;
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Scapy license
t;
>
> *From:* vpp-dev@lists.fd.io *On Behalf Of *Vratko
> Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via lists.fd.io
> *Sent:* Friday, 2021-January-29 18:10
> *To:* Paul Vinciguerra
> *Cc:* t...@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ;
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> *Subject:* Re:
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Vratko Polak -X
(vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via lists.fd.io
Sent: Friday, 2021-January-29 18:10
To: Paul Vinciguerra
Cc: t...@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ;
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Scapy license in VPP
> Why do you say that
Sure .. the original command line magic was ...
find . -name test -type d | xargs -I '{}' find '{}' -type f -exec git
--no-pager log --follow --pretty=format:"%ae" "{}" \; -exec echo \; | sort |
uniq | sort -t@ -k2 | awk -F@ '{print $2}' | uniq -c
Ray
On 28/01/2021 17:43, Vratko Polak -X (vrpo
o Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) <
> vrpo...@cisco.com>
> *Cc:* t...@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ;
> vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> *Subject:* Re: [vpp-dev] Scapy license in VPP
>
>
>
> Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed?
>
>
>
> On Thu
Vratko,
> > Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed?
>
> I think e-mail reply would be long,
> and I will need to address comments anyway,
> so I respond via a Gerrit change [1].
I didn't understand the argument made in that patch. Two points for originality
regarding choice of to
tko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco)
Cc: t...@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray ;
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Scapy license in VPP
Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:43 PM Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES
Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed?
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:43 PM Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via lists.fd.io
wrote:
> First draft created [0] for the change that will switch
>
> licenses for Python files used together with Scapy.
>
>
>
> For
First draft created [0] for the change that will switch
licenses for Python files used together with Scapy.
For some files, I was not sure whether they are used together with Scapy.
One big detail is that vpp_papi needs to have dual license,
as test framework integrates with it (and with scapy).
10 matches
Mail list logo
