> Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed? I think e-mail reply would be long, and I will need to address comments anyway, so I respond via a Gerrit change [1].
Vratko. [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/31025 From: Paul Vinciguerra <pvi...@vinciconsulting.com> Sent: Friday, 2021-January-29 15:29 To: Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) <vrpo...@cisco.com> Cc: t...@lists.fd.io; Kinsella, Ray <ray.kinse...@intel.com>; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Scapy license in VPP Why do you say that vpp_papi need to be dual licensed? On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:43 PM Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) via lists.fd.io<http://lists.fd.io> <vrpolak=cisco....@lists.fd.io<mailto:cisco....@lists.fd.io>> wrote: [cid:image001.gif@01D6F669.E8857E30] First draft created [0] for the change that will switch licenses for Python files used together with Scapy. For some files, I was not sure whether they are used together with Scapy. One big detail is that vpp_papi needs to have dual license, as test framework integrates with it (and with scapy). If I understand the licensing logic correctly, CSIT tests can still choose to use vpp_papi under Apache license option. But we may need to discuss that with lawyers. Ray, you may need to upgrade your contributor-finding shell pipeline to cover all files I added the new license into. Vratko. [0] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/30998
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#18632): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/18632 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/80189290/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io Unsubscribe: https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
