+1
Thanks Damjan for stepping up 😉
From: on behalf of Edward Warnicke
Date: Friday, September 25, 2020 at 12:54 PM
To: Dave Wallace
Cc: "Dave Barach (dbarach)" , "vpp-committ...@lists.fd.io"
, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-committers] [vpp-dev] VPP committers: VPP PTL vote
+1
On
Hi Juraj,
How many instances and what level of performance are you looking at?
Even if you assign different cores to each VPP instance, results can be skewed
due to interference at the LLC and PCIe/NIC level (this can be somewhat
mitigated by running on separate sockets)
Alec
From: on
writes)
as those do not require as many pps.
For pps in VM it is better to use pktgen or any equivalent traffic generator
based on DPDK.
Alec
From: on behalf of Sara Gittlin
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 8:12 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
S
A good step in the right direction. How does this translate in terms of python
package versioning?
Ideally, we should have a python PyPI package for programming VPP using python
library.
Thanks
Alec
From: on behalf of "Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki -
PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at
Impressive!
Is there any document describing the features, how is it integrated with the
rest of VPP, CLI, compile flags, APIs and short term use cases?
Thanks
Alec
From: on behalf of "Damjan Marion (damarion)"
Date: Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 5:45 AM
To: vpp-dev
Subject
Comments inline…
From: "Liew, Irene"
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 10:25 AM
To: Thomas F Herbert , "csit-...@lists.fd.io"
, "Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)"
Cc: vpp-dev , "Pierre Pfister (ppfister)"
, "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" ,
sure how the CSIT test configures the cores and I suspect it is as you
describe.
Thanks
Alec
From: Karl Rister
Organization: Red Hat
Reply-To: "kris...@redhat.com"
Date: Monday, February 20, 2017 at 11:29 AM
To: Thomas F Herbert , "Alec Hothan (ahothan)"
, "Maciek
interfaces) PDR 7.47Mpps.
while the results in your slides put it at around 11Mpps.
So either your testbed really switches 2 times more packets than the CSIT one,
or you’re actually reporting double the amount compared to how CSIT reports it…
Thanks
Alec
From: Karl Rister
Organization: Red
deployment/VNF that handles that type of
flow pattern, do you?
Thanks
Alec
From: on behalf of "Maciek Konstantynowicz
(mkonstan)"
Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 at 1:28 PM
To: Thomas F Herbert
Cc: Andrew Theurer , Douglas Shakshober
, "csit-...@lists.fd.io" , vp
).
Thanks
Alec
From: on behalf of "Matej Klotton -X (mklotton -
PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)"
Date: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 6:59 AM
To: "John Lo (loj)" , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Deleting VXLAN interface doesn't delete it from
in
Regards,
Alec
From: on behalf of "Gray, Mark D"
Date: Friday, December 16, 2016 at 2:23 AM
To: Thomas F Herbert , "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vHost user test scenarios for CSIT - TWS meeting
Hi,
I am arriving a little bit late to this topic. I have b
guess we could use the python
client API as well although licensing for python code is a bit special). It can
extract all vpp interface stats with the proper collectd config.
Thanks
Alec
From: on behalf of Joel Halpern
Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 12:29 PM
To: "Dave B
of the traffic generator frames (likely range
of L3 addresses) in order to do proper load balancing.
Best Regards,
Alec
From: on behalf of Thomas F Herbert
Date: Tuesday, December 13, 2016 at 9:39 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vHost user test sce
requires quite a bit of VM
and system tuning. That is perhaps more appropriate for solution integration
testing.
Regards,
Alec
From: Damon Wang
Date: Monday, November 21, 2016 at 1:45 AM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)"
Cc: Thomas F Herbert , "Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)&quo
Ok thanks for the clarification.
I’ll check with CSIT and will see for the retry config when I get a chance to
test this on my testbed.
Alec
From: "Damjan Marion (damarion)"
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 2:03 AM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)"
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject:
connect between
the 2 virtual interfaces). For the L3 case, the L3 config should be done
through config drive (not SSH).
That’s it for now,
Alec
From: "Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)"
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:27 PM
To: Thomas F Herbert , vpp-dev ,
"csit-
Alec
From: on behalf of "Damjan Marion (damarion)"
Date: Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 3:21 AM
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] native vhost-user perf improvements
I know that several people are playing with VPP vhost-user implementation
so just a heads-up about latest change
mance in the vswitch between physical interfaces, potentially virtual
interfaces such as vxlan tunnels and vhost interfaces.
Thanks
Alec
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
18 matches
Mail list logo
