Hi Ed,
Thank you for scheduling the proposal review.
I think a TSC meeting after Aug 21 is better, to follow the FD.io TSC policy.
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: Ed Warnicke [mailto:hagb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 5:09 AM
To: Ni, Hongjun
Cc: t...@lists.fd.io; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Wa
Hi,I am on 18.10 and trying to enable reassembly and fragmentation. It is
working fine for vxlan and vxlan-gpe tunnels but IPSec it is not.We set
physical interface MTU to be 1500 and IPSEC interface MTU to 1350 to give room
for encryption.
The issue we are seeing is packets are getting fragment
Hongjun,
You guys are eligible for project creation review starting at the Aug 21
TSC meeting I believe (based on sending the notification to the TSC on Aug
8) ... when would you like to schedule for that Thu's TSC meeting, or a
subsequent one?
Ed
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:11 PM Ni, Hongjun wrot
Hi all,
I am trying to setup two WAN interfaces where each of them can access
to the outside world at the same time.
So far I have:
set int state wan0 up
set int state wan1 up
set int ip address wan0 172.78.10.155/29
set dhcp client intfc wan1 hostname test-wans
ip route add 0.0.0.0/0 via 172.
Hi Dave,
I totally agree with you that my email was an over-simplification of a bigger
issue for sure.
What we are trying to see is:
can a single thread handle both control plane and data plane activities for a
particular application object ( ex: a flow object) , so that, a need of lock
can be
What you’ve written is a best an oversimplification. It’s not correct to say
that vpp lacks lockless data structures, and that all table-programming
activities require coarse-grained locking and/or barrier synchronization.
Rather than starting a discussion from first principles, would it be poss
Hi ,
Need some inputs on the lock less architecture with multi-threaded VPP system.
>From the experiences we had so far, taking a lock ( whatsoever small time the
>lock is taken for ) degrades
the performance. Hence, trying to see if we have any feasibility of lockless
architecture in VPP.
We h
OK, that is not exactly what you asked in your first email.
If you want to find out size of struct and all child/indirect data, you will
need to sum all of them manually.
Most of them are vectors, so you cal use vl() helper in gdb to get length. I.e.
(gdb) p sizeof (ikev2_rekey_t) * vl(my_ikev2_
The invocation of sizeof() does not cover the whole allocated memory for
IKE SA.
That structure has the pointers of other nested structures, the pointers of
keys and so on.
2019년 8월 13일 (화) 오후 7:38, Damjan Marion 님이 작성:
>
>
> > On 13 Aug 2019, at 05:01, jmpar...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Hi, all
>
> On 13 Aug 2019, at 05:01, jmpar...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi, all
>
> I'd like to measure the allocated memory size for the whole structure of IKE
> SA (ikev2_sa_t).
> Because ikev2_sa_t has many other struct types, it is not simple for me to
> measure the memory size.
>
> Is there any metho
>> uDPI
> microDPI
Universal Deep Packet Inspection is the new project here.
Would it make sense to use UDPI as its abbreviation
(e.g. capital U, to distinguish from "micro")?
Vratko.
From: t...@lists.fd.io on behalf of Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Tuesday, August
Hi all,
Just a kind reminder that 19.08 RC2 milestone is tomorrow.
After that milestone, only critical bug fixes will be merged into
stable/1908 in preparation for the release.
--a
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#13718): https://l
12 matches
Mail list logo
