That fixed the Centos build/verify job, but now the ubuntu1604
build/verify job failed with today's favorite failure signature.
Oh bother...
-daw-
On 05/18/2017 06:09 PM, Dave Wallace wrote:
Rebased. We'll see if that makes any difference.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 05/18/2017 04:37 PM, Florin Coras
Rebased. We'll see if that makes any difference.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 05/18/2017 04:37 PM, Florin Coras wrote:
Well, uri.am is a known issue, apparently not the only one ...
As you’ve previously noted, probably the vm is not cleaned up before
the testing and because the suffix (note *vpp1 instea
Well, uri.am is a known issue, apparently not the only one ...
As you’ve previously noted, probably the vm is not cleaned up before the
testing and because the suffix (note *vpp1 instead of *vpp3) is older Centos
refuses to do our bidding. Can you try a rebase to pick up 6745 and the vpp3
suffi
Florin,
After reverting the changes to uri.am, I'm still seeing the same failure
signature:
%<
18:24:18 sudo rpm -Uih vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp1.x86_64.rpm
18:24:18
18:24:19 package vpp-dpdk-devel-17.05-vpp3.x86_64 (which is newer
than vpp
Yes, look at Mellanox case in dpdk.am. if you want to upstream patch you will
need to add additional stuff into configure.ac...
On 18 May 2017, at 14:07, Marco Varlese
mailto:marco.varl...@suse.com>> wrote:
Hi Devendra,
Did you try to look at src/plugins/dpdk.am ?
Cheers,
Marco
On Thu, 201
Doesn't look like 'make test' issue to me, especially if there is no
code change...
Infra acting up?
Klement
Quoting Dave Wallace (2017-05-18 14:34:24)
>Folks,
>
>The following patches all failed to verify due to the same failure
>signature in 'make test':
>
> [1]https://gerrit
Folks,
The following patches all failed to verify due to the same failure
signature in 'make test':
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/6751
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/5499/console
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/6752
https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/55
Hi Devendra,
Did you try to look at src/plugins/dpdk.am ?
Cheers,
Marco
On Thu, 2017-05-18 at 15:42 +0530, devendra rawat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to run VPP on an arm64 processor. I am using DPDK v16.11.
> > My board is having a non-pci ethernet interface I have added a PMD for that
> >
Florin,
I was also curious as to why this failure only happened on centos. I
suspect that the debian package manager is less strict about allowing a
prior version package to be installed than the rpm package manager. I
don't have any experience with the rpm package manager, and haven't been
Hi Ray,
The problem still exists, Is there any problem in reply message?
Thanks,
xyxue
From: Kinsella, Ray
Date: 2017-05-18 19:05
To: 薛欣颖; nranns; Damjan Marion
CC: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Failed to ping between two VPP
Hi Xyxue,
Please try this patch to see if it helps.
https://ger
I have corrected my commands (ethernet-input -> l2-learn)
classify table l2-input-miss-next input-node error-drop mask l2 src
vpp# classify session l2-input-hit-next input-node l2-learn table-index 1
match l2 src 90:e2:ba:d6:24:5d
That's my fault.
2017-05-18 16:16 GMT+05:00 Vitaly I :
> Hi,
>
>
Hi,
I try to create test input and output l2 classify with one interface (show
ver
vpp v17.04-release)
vpp# set int state TenGigabitEthernet6/0/0 up
vpp# loopback create-interface mac 11:22:33:11:22:33
loop0
vpp# set int state loop0 up
vpp# set int ip address loop0 2.2.2.2/30
vpp# set int l2 bridg
Hi Xyxue,
Please try this patch to see if it helps.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/6758/1
Ray K
On 18/05/2017 09:28, 薛欣颖 wrote:
Hi neale,
'failed' means this :
DBGvpp# ping 192.168.153.130
Statistics: 300 sent, 0 received, 100% packet loss
what I know is in'run_ping_ip46_address', L598 got th
Hi,
I am trying to run VPP on an arm64 processor. I am using DPDK v16.11.
My board is having a non-pci ethernet interface I have added a PMD for that
in DPDK.
This PMD makes calls to an external library libxal which is platform
specific. All DPDK
apps. including testpmd work fine.
Using this DPD
Hi neale,
'failed' means this :
DBGvpp# ping 192.168.153.130
Statistics: 300 sent, 0 received, 100% packet loss
what I know is in'run_ping_ip46_address', L598 got the wrong event_type
I'm not running with multiple worker threads.
My two vpp is in two 14.04 ubuntu,The two host interfaces are i
15 matches
Mail list logo
