Eric,
How do you configure the startup.conf with multiple worker threads? Did you
change both corelist-workers and workers? For example, this is how I configure
2 worker threads using core 2 and 14.
corelist-workers 2,14
workers 2
Any chance you can start vpp with gdb to get th
Makes sense, thanks Steven.
One more round of questions -- I expected the numbers I got between the two VMs
(~2gpbs) given that I had just a single core running for VPP. I went ahead and
amended my startup.conf in order to make use of 2 and then again as 4 worker
threads, all within the same s
Eric,
In my testing, I notice my number is 2 to 3X better when coalesce is disabled.
I am using Ivy Bridge. So it looks like the mileage varies a lot with Sandy
Bridge, 40X better.
What is coalesce?
When the driver places descriptors into the vring, it may request interrupt or
no interrupt aft
Steven,
Thanks for the help. As before, setup is described @
https://gist.github.com/egernst/5982ae6f0590cd83330faafacc3fd545 (updated since
I no longer am using the evil feature mask).
I'm going to need to read up on what coalesce frames setting is doing
Without that set, you can find
Should we try to deprecate it to ease some of Damjans guilt? :)
Chris
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
Behalf Of Billy McFall
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 16:29
To: Damjan Marion (damarion)
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Connectivity is
Eric,
As a first step, please share the output of iperf3 to see how many
retransmissions that you have for the run. From VPP, please collect show errors
to see if vhost drops anything. As an additional data point for comparison,
please also try disabling vhost coalesce to see if you get better
Is it expected that the socket be kept on filesystem after the vhost-user
interface
is removed from the system? This surprised me.
To recreate:
create vhost socket /tmp/sock2.sock server
delete vhost https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
Thanks Billy - it was through some examples that i had found that I ended up
grabbing that. I reinstalled 1704 and can verify connectivity when removing the
evil feature-mask.
Thanks for the quick feedback, Damjan. If we could only go back in time!
Now if I could just figure out why I'm getti
Hi
can use dpdk ring in vpp?
can en-queue packet in vpp and dequeue packet in another process?
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
The vHost examples on the Wiki used the feature-mask of 0xFF. I think that
is how it got propagated. In 16.09 when I did the CLI documentation for the
vHost, I expanded what the bits meant and used feature-mask 0x4040 as
the example. I will gladly add an additional comment indicating that the
r
Eric,
long time ago ( i think 3+ years) when I wrote original vhost-user driver in
vpp,
I added feature-mask knob to cli which messes up with feature bitmap purely for
debugging
reasons.
And I regret many times…
Somebody dig it out and documented it somewhere, for to me unknown reasons.
Now i
Eric,
Something stands out to me is the feature-mask 0xff when you create the vhost
interface. Why do you specify 0xff? While I am checking 17.01 to see how this
feature-mask 0xff works, could you please try it without the feature-mask? It
does not look like feature-mask 0xff would work in 17.0
Looping in CSIT.
CSIT folks, do we have a system test that would catch this case?
Ed
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Ernst, Eric wrote:
> All,
>
> After updating the startup.conf to not reference DPDK, per direction in
> release
> notification thread, I was able to startup vpp and create int
All,
After updating the startup.conf to not reference DPDK, per direction in release
notification thread, I was able to startup vpp and create interfaces.
Now that I'm testing, I noticed that I can no longer ping between VM hosts which
make use of vhost-user interfaces and are connected via l2 br
Could you expand on what you mean by Interface updates?
Ed
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Bernier, Daniel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> From my “biased” point of view :-) and not in any order of preference
>
>
>
> 1) SRv6
>
> 2) Host Stack
>
> 3) iOAM
>
> 4) Interfaces updates
Oh. You merged your own patch, rather than the one I already prepared last
night.
Never mind, then.
Chris.
> -Original Message-
> From: otr...@employees.org [mailto:otr...@employees.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 3:00 AM
> To: Luke, Chris
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re:
Hi,
From my “biased” point of view :-) and not in any order of preference
1) SRv6
2) Host Stack
3) iOAM
4) Interfaces updates
Thanks,
PS: sorry for the double mail, touched the wrong key :-)
Daniel Bernier | Bell Canada
From: on behalf of Ed Warnicke
Date: Wedn
Hi,
From my “biased” point of view :-) and not in any order of preference
1) SRv6
2) Host Stack
3) iOAM
Host Stack
Daniel Bernier | Bell Canada
From: on behalf of Ed Warnicke
Date: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 5:23 PM
To: vpp-dev , honeycomb-dev ,
"csit-...@lists.
Yup, thanks :)
Chris.
> -Original Message-
> From: otr...@employees.org [mailto:otr...@employees.org]
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 3:00 AM
> To: Luke, Chris
> Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
> Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 17.04 released
>
> Chris,
>
> > But also, eek! I think the 17.01 relea
19 matches
Mail list logo
