[vpp-dev] ppp interface and route dpo

Hi all I create a ppp interface and set ip on it, the interface route dpo is glean, which means need to be resloved by arp? How could i to get this correct? Regards, Ewan yug...@telincn.com ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.f

Re: [vpp-dev] Tuple Classify

I will try that, thanks. Ewan yug...@telincn.com From: Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab) Date: 2017-01-21 16:58 To: yug...@telincn.com; vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Tuple Classify You could use the classifier to do this: Example: To redirect IP6 flows with destination matching to a node named "f

Re: [vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:05:55 -0500 Burt Silverman wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > My understanding is that CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU will never be set in a stock > kernel, and you will need to build a custom kernel for that. I understand > that with this option, the kernel cannot guarantee that applications a

[vpp-dev] FW: Error reading from file descriptor 9: Input/output error

Hi vpp-dev, I’m encountering this strange issue: VPP keeps generating this error message into /var/log/syslog: Jan 24 23:28:19 localhost vpp[4749]: EAL: Error reading from file descriptor 9: Input/output error Jan 24 23:28:19 localhost vpp[4749]: /usr/bin/vpp[4749]: EAL: Error reading from fil

[vpp-dev] VPP 17.01 on VFIO-PCI driver

Hi, VPP guys, I have a RHEL 7.3 setup with Intel X710, and want to bring VPP 17.01 on top of it. Among all three DPDK drivers: (1) uio_pci_generic is not supported on X710 (http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/19820/), and driver bind failed; (2) igb_uio will work perfectly, but does not co

Re: [vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

I think the latest and greatest ATOMs have iommu support. On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Burt Silverman wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > My understanding is that CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU will never be set in a stock > kernel, and you will need to build a custom kernel for that. I understand > that with thi

Re: [vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

Hi Damjan, My understanding is that CONFIG_VFIO_NOIOMMU will never be set in a stock kernel, and you will need to build a custom kernel for that. I understand that with this option, the kernel cannot guarantee that applications are prevented from creating bugs that normally the kernel can guarante

Re: [vpp-dev] How to setup BVI with a ip address?

Hi Alfa, Why do you want to push VLAN tag 10 into the BD? This won't work with BVI, as I explained before, which is a main interface and therefore cannot send packet into the BD with VLAN tag 10. So when the ARP response come back from BVI to output on GigabitEthernetd/0/0 with sw_if_index1, it

[vpp-dev] SNAT Plugin Use

Folks, What is the expected method to use the SNAT plugin within the framework of the rest of a VPP system? Specifically, what is the expected use of VL_MSG_FIRST_AVAILABLE? It is several (4) enum include files, and they conflict if two or more are used in the same source file. Here is a terse e

Re: [vpp-dev] Add dpdk development packaging

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Alexander Popovsky (apopovsk) < apopo...@cisco.com> wrote: > Damjan, > > After this change, ‘pkg-rpm’ target on the CentOS host seems to be failing > (on master): > > $ git clean -xfd > $ make bootstrap pkg-rpm > ... > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) fou

Re: [vpp-dev] [FD.io Helpdesk #35687] Re: Verify job failure(s)

The short version is that given the non-deterministic time for updates to package dependencies submitted to ci-management to actually arrive in live images, when someone needs to add a dependency within VPP they are faced with waiting for N-days (where N is typically a number typically in the do

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu 14.04 support in vpp 17.04?

Ubuntu 14.04 was deprecated in CSIT as of CSIT 16.09, so it has been a while since CSIT tests have been run on Ubuntu 14.04 in the continuous integration testing loop. I agree that we should deprecate official Ubuntu 14.04 support in VPP 17.01 Thanks, -daw- On 01/24/2017 02:04 PM, Dave Barach

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu 14.04 support in vpp 17.04?

We do have products that still need to support running vpp 17.04 on Ubuntu 14.04 VMs. -John From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Dave Barach (dbarach) Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 2:04 PM To: Ed Warnicke ; vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu 14.04 support in vpp 17.04?

I’d say “no, let’s deprecate official 14.04 support.” Other opinions? Thanks… Dave From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ed Warnicke Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 1:27 PM To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu 14.04 support in vpp 17.04? The ques

Re: [vpp-dev] Ubuntu 14.04 support in vpp 17.04?

> On 24 Jan 2017, at 19:26, Ed Warnicke wrote: > > The question has come up on a different thread as to whether we should > continue to support > Ubuntu 14.04 in vpp 17.04. > > What are folks opinions? > At the time when we plan to release 17.04 ubuntu 16.04 will be out for 1 year so I th

[vpp-dev] Ubuntu 14.04 support in vpp 17.04?

The question has come up on a different thread as to whether we should continue to support Ubuntu 14.04 in vpp 17.04. What are folks opinions? Ed ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev

Re: [vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

> On 24 Jan 2017, at 18:33, Ed Warnicke wrote: > > I can tell you why we did it to begin with (which I'm hoping is no longer a > valid reason). We originally did it because ubuntu 14.04 did not have any > appropriate usable packages for uio drivers. I for one would be overjoyed to > make t

Re: [vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

> On 24 Jan 2017, at 18:40, Damjan Marion (damarion) wrote: > >> >> On 24 Jan 2017, at 18:26, Stephen Hemminger >> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:14:42 + >> "Damjan Marion (damarion)" wrote: >> >>> Is anybody aware of any valid reason why we cannot switch to uio_pci_generic >>> as

Re: [vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

> On 24 Jan 2017, at 18:26, Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:14:42 + > "Damjan Marion (damarion)" wrote: > >> Is anybody aware of any valid reason why we cannot switch to uio_pci_generic >> as default PCI uio driver in ubuntu packages? >> >> I think generally people

Re: [vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

I can tell you why we did it to begin with (which I'm hoping is no longer a valid reason). We originally did it because ubuntu 14.04 did not have any appropriate usable packages for uio drivers. I for one would be overjoyed to make the shift you are proposing, but we do need to decide what we wan

Re: [vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:14:42 + "Damjan Marion (damarion)" wrote: > Is anybody aware of any valid reason why we cannot switch to uio_pci_generic > as default PCI uio driver in ubuntu packages? > > I think generally people don’t like out-of-tree modules, so as long as we are > getting > the s

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp home gateway use-case added to wiki.fd.io

“It should just work...” I’m vastly more familiar with Ubuntu, which is why I went there. Thanks… Dave From: Bernier, Daniel [mailto:daniel.bern...@bell.ca] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:55 AM To: Dave Barach (dbarach) ; vpp-dev Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] vpp home gateway use-case added to wik

[vpp-dev] igb_uio -> uio_pci_generic

Is anybody aware of any valid reason why we cannot switch to uio_pci_generic as default PCI uio driver in ubuntu packages? I think generally people don’t like out-of-tree modules, so as long as we are getting the same service from uio_pci_generic we should use it… Thanks, Damjan __

[vpp-dev] plugin infrastructure changes

As discussed on the call, let’s continue discussion on the mailer. My RFC patch is at: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4824/ copy/paste from commit log: == This patch replaces requirement for vlib_plugin_register function in the plugin so file and introduces new macro: VLIB_PLUGIN_REGISTER () =

Re: [vpp-dev] Coverity warnings in generated java files

I found following rule .*/build-root/.*/vpp-api/java/jvpp-core/.* I think it should be .*/build-root/.*/vpp-api/java/.* Regards, Marek From: hc2vpp-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:hc2vpp-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Sent: 17 stycz

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp home gateway use-case added to wiki.fd.io

Hi Dave, Quick question would you see any hurdles running it over CentOS? … newer Netgate’s ship with CentOS by default Thanks, Daniel Bernier | Bell Canada From: on behalf of "Dave Barach (dbarach)" Date: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 8:23 AM To: vpp-dev Subject: [vpp-dev] vpp home g

[vpp-dev] vpp home gateway use-case added to wiki.fd.io

In case folks are interested, see: https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/VPP_Home_Gateway Note that the exercise resulted in the addition of a couple of new features for the snat plugin, and a jira ticket: https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-612 ___ vpp-dev mailing l

Re: [vpp-dev] SNAT and tap for SSH problem

Hi, please try latest VPP code, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/4751/ should fix your problem. Regards, [banner3a1] Matus Fabian Engineer - Software matfa...@cisco.com Tel: Cisco Systems, Inc. Slovakia cisco.com [http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyoup

Re: [vpp-dev] SNAT and tap for SSH problem

So sorry for my formatting... "Machine A" 1.1.2.10/24 with default route 1.1.2.1 "VPP host" (linux machine) 1.1.1.10/24 with static route 1.1.2.0/24 via 1.1.1.1 On VPP side GigabitEthernet2/0/0 with ip 1.1.2.1/24 looking to Machine "A", tap-0 with ip 1.1.1.1/24 looking to "VPP host", and Gigabi

[vpp-dev] SNAT and tap for SSH problem

Hi all! I have a problem when SNAT enable on VPP side. "Machine A" 1.1.2.10/24 with default route 10.2.1.1"VPP host" (linux machine) 1.1.1.10/24 with static route 1.1.2.0/24 via 1.1.1.1On VPP side GigabitEthernet2/0/0 with ip 1.1.2.1/24 looking to Machine "A", tap-0 with ip 1.1.1.1/24 looking to