Ole,
Yes, this is part of a broader conversation between yourself, Hongjun and I
mainly due to you owning the policy JIRA and Hongjun who has a VPP patch
for NSH.
It has to be a time thats amenable to you both but wanted to open it to all.
If you and Hongjun want to let me know a time that works
Keith,
I'd certainly like to participate in that. Would it be possible to do it Friday
or next week?
(And for Europeans remember that the US is still on daylight savings time.)
Best regards,
Ole
> On 1 Nov 2016, at 01:26, Keith Burns wrote:
>
> I scheduled a meeting on the fdio calendar for
Keith,
I'd certainly like to participate in that. Would it be possible to do it Friday
or next week?
(And for Europeans remember that the US is still on daylight savings time.)
Best regards,
Ole
> On 1 Nov 2016, at 01:26, Keith Burns wrote:
>
> I scheduled a meeting on the fdio calendar for
That code was outdated. You can achieve same effect with “set interface
handoff”.
Thanks,
Damjan
> On 31 Oct 2016, at 21:47, Mli wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I have a question about IO thread mode in VPP. is there any strong reason(s)
> why IO threads are deprecated in 16.09? This mode may be u
Dear Dave,
I would like to step down as VPP committer.
Thank you,
Stefan
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
The ask from the pnda team was for a high-precision timestamp, not a
millisecond granularity timestamp. The current Linux epoch as of this writing
is approximately 1,478,087,552.
Double-precision FP numbers have a 53-bit fraction (52 bits explicitly stored).
Adding a fixed bias of O(1e9) to a d
Hi everyone,
Trying out the flow-per-packet plugin which Dave hacked and merged a few days
ago. While it works fine in general I’ve noticed the flowStartNanoseconds field
here stands for the time since vpp started.
This brings in the problem that the collector has to know when VPP started as
we
