Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Wallace
I rebased https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-csit-verify-virl-master/1855 which had also been failing due to the jvpp build failure and the build has completed. We'll see if the CSIT tests pass or not in the AM. Thanks, -daw- On 10/21/16 12:01 AM, Dave Wallace wrote: I started to +2 this, because

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Wallace
I started to +2 this, because the build failures appear to be fixed. Then decided not to merge it, but managed to hit the submit button anyways. So it has been merged. I'll investigate the random CSIT test failures tomorrow. Thanks, -daw- On 10/20/16 3:31 PM, Edward Warnicke wrote: So the f

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Edward Warnicke
So the first run of https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3511/ succeeded, the second failed (see: https://jenkins.fd.io/job/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/1833/console ) which looks like test failures unrelated to the build failures we were seeing before. CSIT folks, thoughts? Ed On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Wallace
Thanks Ed! -daw- On 10/20/2016 01:01 PM, Edward Warnicke wrote: You mean like this: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3511/1/vpp-api/java/Makefile.am :) Ed On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Dave Wallace > wrote: Klement, Thanks for helping improve the java buil

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Wallace
Yes, please. Let's run it 5 times and then I'll be willing to merge it. Thanks, -daw- On 10/20/2016 02:03 PM, Luke, Chris wrote: It passed the first time round; do we want to exercise it a bit before merging? Chris *From:*csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io]

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Luke, Chris
It passed the first time round; do we want to exercise it a bit before merging? Chris From: csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:csit-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Edward Warnicke Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 13:01 To: Dave Wallace Cc: csit-...@lists.fd.io; Klement Sekera -X (kseker

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Edward Warnicke
You mean like this: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3511/1/vpp-api/java/Makefile.am :) Ed On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Dave Wallace wrote: > Klement, > > Thanks for helping improve the java build infrastructure. > > I think that you may find that the execution of the build system is very > diffe

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Wallace
Klement, Thanks for helping improve the java build infrastructure. I think that you may find that the execution of the build system is very different on the LF cloud infrastructure then on a typical development platform. IIRC, this is not the first time we've been bitten by that particular b

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Barach (dbarach)
+1 on the “real mess” comment. From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 12:24 PM To: Edward Warnicke Cc: csit-...@lists.fd.io; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re:

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Barach (dbarach)
Makefile.am bug. Try -l:libjvpp_common.la in libjvpp_registry_la_LIBADD instead of -ljvpp_common. Worst case, add an explicit dependency. Thanks... Dave From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Dave Wallace Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 12:16 PM To

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Edward Warnicke
Klement, I'm not quite ready to point the finger strongly at that patch yet... I appreciate you trying to improve the java build system :) On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote: > It's quite possible, I've made multiple builds and re

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
It's quite possible, I've made multiple builds and rebuilds to make sure I didn't break anything, but I apparently did. Feel free to revert the patch and I'll take a look at it again. That java build stuff is a real mess... Klement On Oct 20, 2016 6:22 PM, Edward Warnicke wrote: This change:

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Edward Warnicke
This change: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/3486/ Was touching that part of the world... *if* it is a race condition, is it possible that this patch got lucky, and the ones that followed did not? Ed On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Dave Wallace wrote: > Maciek, > > This looks like a race conditio

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] vpp-csit-verify-virl-master - some more build failures

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Wallace
Maciek, This looks like a race condition in the build for JVPP. All of the failures contain the following error: 09:32:35 make[5]: Entering directory '/w/workspace/vpp-verify-master-ubuntu1604/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp-api/java' 09:32:35 CC jvpp-common/libjvpp_common_la-jvpp_

Re: [vpp-dev] Problems with sub-interfaces

2016-10-20 Thread John Lo (loj)
Since MAC on a sub-interface is the same as that of the main interface, does it make sense to set MAC on a sub-interface? If so, wouldn't MAC also be changed for the main interface and other sub-interfaces on the same port? I doubt NICs can use separate MACs for sub-interfaces as it is transpare

Re: [vpp-dev] Problems with sub-interfaces

2016-10-20 Thread Dave Barach (dbarach)
Both Jira tickets now in "request information" state, please update... Thanks... Dave From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Tibor Frank -X (tifrank - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 9:59 AM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Sub

[vpp-dev] Problems with sub-interfaces

2016-10-20 Thread Tibor Frank -X (tifrank - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Hi I found two issues: 1. It is not possible to create a sub-interface using VAT - https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-506 2. It is not possible to set MAC address for a sub-interface - https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-507 Can someone look at it, please. Thanks Tibor __

Re: [vpp-dev] Queries regarding test cases for "vppinfra"

2016-10-20 Thread Ayush Singhal
I tried the test cases on a 64 bit machine and they passed alright. I tried the same on a 32 bit machine, expecting positive results straight away! Well, I don't know if i missed anything because my compilation on a 32 bit machine was successful. Was planning on unit testing each of the vpp compon

[vpp-dev] About dpdk tx failure

2016-10-20 Thread yu scott
Hi all I run vpp in kvm vm,and the software nic is vhost-user. I test the vpp route performance with Tester, vm connect Tester with dpdk ovs datapath I exec the cli "show error" it show item has so many packet. I know vpp forward packets via vector,which is a set of packet.In my experience，If v