Hi Bob,
The "critical volume" idea I proposed was mostly based on the simple
observation that in loosely similar experiments using much lower amounts
of catalyst material (perhaps a few hundred milligrams at most in the
experiments for example reported by Holmlid and sometimes cited here by
J
It is hard to separate Mills' theory from Holmlid's work. They are likely to
be complementary with both offering important details. One early experiment for
a "critical volume" validation could involve the catalytic propensity of
reactor itself. IOW - a large volume with NO added catalyst other
On 2021-11-23 15:39, Jones Beene wrote:
It is hard to separate Mills' theory from Holmlid's work. They are
likely to be complementary with both offering important details. One
early experiment for a "critical volume" validation could involve the
catalytic propensity of reactor itself. IOW - a l
Thanks for remembering this experiment from Simon Brink !
The effect is surprisingly large and my bet is that it only works well with 316
grade SS.
If so - that would be good evidence for Mills' theory and the importance of the
lowest energy catalyst. Nickel alone should not work as well.
As you
On 2021-11-23 17:44, Jones Beene wrote:
Thanks for remembering this experiment from Simon Brink !
The effect is surprisingly large and my bet is that it only works well
with 316 grade SS.
If so - that would be good evidence for Mills' theory and the
importance of the lowest energy catalyst.
Jones, is there a link where we could access your monel metal experiments?
Years ago, I did a lot of CF experiments using cupronickel in an unusual form.
These were successful, but the results were inconsistent for reasons that are
obvious when you know my procedure. I am not a scientist, so I h
6 matches
Mail list logo
