On 7/16/17, Alain Sepeda wrote:
>
> multiple independent instruments are also more convincing than just two.
***That is why I criticized MFMP's dropping this line of inquiry due
to personal circumstances, not due to lack of promise of earlier
results.
It turns out that Matthieu had all the equi
more generally correlation of complex signal mean uch more than just
signal, one shot corelation, of simple/regular signal corrélation.
correlating two ramp, two exponential is nearly meaningless (this is
however often published in newspapers - some correlated increase of organic
food production a
So then a gamma ray detection followed by a replication within 48
hours would be very significant, wouldn't you say? That's why I'm
disappointed MFMP didn't pursue this line of inquiry.
On 7/15/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
>>
>
>> There is no known chemical interaction th
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
> There is no known chemical interaction that leads to
> hydrogen/deuterium generating gammas when mixed with nickel/palladium.
> Even if there is no excess heat, it MUST be a nuclear phenomena.
>
People familiar these detectors tell me that a one-off event that does n
Biberian's results seem iffy to you, though they came within 48 hours
of the gamma ray finding of MFMP. And then MFMP just dropped the
inquiry due to some personal constraints rather than the lack of
promise in the inquiry. You essentially admit to not clicking on the
link due to a typo. MFMP
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
> > What leads you to doubt Hans Biberian's "replication" of finding the
> >> gamma rays within 48 hours?
>
There is no one by the name "Hans Biberian." That's why I did not recall
any details. I guess you mean Jean-Paul Biberian. J-P. Biberian's results
seem iffy to me.
On 7/14/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
> What leads you to doubt Hans Biberian's "replication" of finding the
>> gamma rays within 48 hours?
>>
>
> Not familiar with that.
***You didn't even click on the link that we're discussing?
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/16-pro
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
What leads you to doubt Hans Biberian's "replication" of finding the
> gamma rays within 48 hours?
>
Not familiar with that.
I don't know much about gamma detection but experts tell me that brief,
one-off incidents are often instrument glitches.
- Jed
What leads you to doubt Hans Biberian's "replication" of finding the
gamma rays within 48 hours?
On 7/14/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
> Well, are you happy with how they handled this gamma ray thing? They
>> just dropped it.
>
>
> I doubt there are any gamma rays, so I wou
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
Well, are you happy with how they handled this gamma ray thing? They
> just dropped it.
I doubt there are any gamma rays, so I wouldn't fret about this. Anyway,
researchers always get to decide what they are going to do. If you aren't
interested in what they chose to do,
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/347-gamma
On 7/13/17, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
> I updated their blog entry for them.
>
> http://www.quantumheat.org/#comment-8874
>
Well, are you happy with how they handled this gamma ray thing? They
just dropped it. The closest thing to the holy grail they ever came
and just decided they wanted to chase white rabbits instead.
On 7/13/17, Esa Ruoho wrote:
> If Kevin's so unhappy with what they're doing, how about Kevin yo
If Kevin's so unhappy with what they're doing, how about Kevin you go and
support them some more, okay? Sell that car, re-mortgage that house twice
and throw money at them. Otherwise, sell all your belongings and move to
live with them and guide (financially and direction-wise) their process so
the
I updated their blog entry for them.
http://www.quantumheat.org/#comment-8874
On 7/13/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> You asked; they answered. What's your problem?
***My problem is that it took them 4 years to do it and they don't
address how they prioritize scientific pursuits. It's willy nilly.
>> We should see their reasoning for supporting some
>> research over other r
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
What do you expect them to do?
***I expect them to inform us on the blog they chose to inform us.
> It would have cost them 10 minutes of their time.
You asked; they answered. What's your problem?
>They have gone
> off on 4 or 5 external trips, chasing down c
On 7/13/17, Jed Rothwell wrote:
What do you expect them to do?
***I expect them to inform us on the blog they chose to inform us.
It would have cost them 10 minutes of their time. They have gone
off on 4 or 5 external trips, chasing down chimera that had less
chance than this. We should
Kevin O'Malley wrote:
Then you have confirmed it: That promising line of inquiry was
> dropped.
They had to drop it. What do you expect them to do? The guy who was doing
it had to get a job and support his family.
You have no business complaining about this. Are you going to pay his
salary an
Then you have confirmed it: That promising line of inquiry was
dropped. You should at least post what you just said on the MFMP
website and ask for anyone who might be interested in furthering this
line of inquiry to get involved. It wasn't dropped due to lack of
progress, it was dropped due to
The experiment reported in your link was done by Mathieu Valat in
France, with support from Jean-Paul Biberian. Mathieu was unable to
continue that work due to the burden of supporting a family. However, he
has recently re-commissioned his concentric-tube calorimeter and gamma
spectrometer in a
Alan:
The original gamma finding was never updated in 2013. MFMP simply
went silent on it.
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/16-progress-blog/347-gamma
On 7/12/17, AlanG wrote:
> Every experiment we run since 2013 has gamma spectrometry in place as
> well as a sensitive Geiger-Muller p
AlanG wrote:
Every experiment we run since 2013 has gamma spectrometry in place as well
> as a sensitive Geiger-Muller pancake detector and several neutron bubble
> detectors.
>
Good! This sounds like a good approach. Using multiple instruments should
make a positive result convincing, especiall
Every experiment we run since 2013 has gamma spectrometry in place as
well as a sensitive Geiger-Muller pancake detector and several neutron
bubble detectors. All the spectral data and G-M counts are published in
near real time and made permanently available for open viewing and
analysis. Just
The issue is:What have you been doing with that gamma ray thing. All the
rest fits into what I called "whatever it is".
On Tuesday, July 11, 2017, AlanG wrote:
> On 7/11/2017 10:24 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
>
> The gamma ray finding of MFMP was replicated within 48 hours by Hans
> Biberian. A
On 7/11/2017 10:24 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
The gamma ray finding of MFMP was replicated within 48 hours by Hans
Biberian. And then they just faded away onto whatever it is they've
been doing for 4 years.
Kevin, your comment suggests that you haven't been paying attention or
even bothering to
25 matches
Mail list logo
