His statement is designed to reduce fears about its production during
application of LENR. If creation of tritium were the goal, this rate
could be easily increased.
Ed Storms
On Feb 1, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
From: "Edmund Storms"
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 2:47:38 PM
From: "Edmund Storms"
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 2:47:38 PM
> Actually Alan, this is a good idea. Tom Claytor has been slowly mastering
> production of tritium using cold fusion to the point where this might be a
> practical source. But as you point out, the excess energy would be a probl
Terry Blanton wrote:
> MILLIONS of cancer -sufferers have been given fresh hope of a cure
> after ground-breaking research. . . .
>
> The discovery by an Israeli specialist was last night hailed as
> "radical and potentially life-changing".
>
> In a world first, Professor Aaron Avivi and his tea
EXCLUSIVE: A cure for ALL cancers is on the way as scientists make
major breakthrough
MILLIONS of cancer -sufferers have been given fresh hope of a cure
after ground-breaking research.
By: Giles Sheldrick
Published: Thu, January 16, 2014
The breakthrough came in a 16-year study of the only -anim
Actually Alan, this is a good idea. Tom Claytor has been slowly
mastering production of tritium using cold fusion to the point where
this might be a practical source. But as you point out, the excess
energy would be a problem. :-)
Ed Storms
On Jan 31, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
Maybe someone could re-target a suitably-tuned LENR system as an online
Tritium-generator and get some of those hot-fusion funds. Of course, it would
need an expensive cooling system to get rid of the excess heat.
Just kidding, of course.
The General fusion design is close to sonofusion. They setup a shock wave
in liquid lead to compress some hydrogen (D and T) in the center of the
liquid lead sphere.
They should use a heavy iconic liquid and cavatate it to produce the shock
wave. We know that this works to produce fusion; but this
Mark Gibbs wrote:
You could level the same charge of trying for years and spending billions
> of dollars against the search for a cure for cancer. Given that progress in
> this field could be described as moderate at best would you also say
> "enough"?
>
Yes, I would reform and refocus cancer re
Yes indeed, we can find many examples of the same disfunction
operating. The difference is, cancer can be cured. Hot fusion can not
be made practical.
Cancer suffers from the same factors that cause LENR to be rejected
and hot fusion to be supported. As long as cancer remains uncured, a
l
Has anyone even _tried_ to come up with objective criteria milestones for
cancer research?
Its not like you can just sit back and think these things up off the top of
your head. I came up with the criteria for the fusion prizes by going
around to all of the proponents of alternative fusion techno
You could level the same charge of trying for years and spending billions
of dollars against the search for a cure for cancer. Given that progress in
this field could be described as moderate at best would you also say
"enough"?
[m]
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> Blaze
What's even more disgraceful is that a founder of the Tokamak program came
out in support of prize awards for achievement of objective criteria:
http://www.oocities.org/jim_bowery/BussardsLetter.html
That legislation called only for $100M per milestone.
Imagine if the $70B that has been sunk int
Yes, it's a disgrace to see the lack of investment in LENR.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> Blaze, they tried for 70 years and have spent tens of billion of dollars.
> We are not even close to a working generator. At what point do we say
> enough - please try something e
Blaze, they tried for 70 years and have spent tens of billion of
dollars. We are not even close to a working generator. At what point
do we say enough - please try something else. Why not take a look at
cold fusion for a change? Instead, they keep exploring different
variations of hot fusio
I don't get it. Why whinge like that? I think it's great they are
trying. Let them take their best shot. Better than investing billions of
dollars in SnapChat.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> This claim suffers from the same limitations that haunt laser fusion and
>
This claim suffers from the same limitations that haunt laser fusion
and magnetic bubble fusion (ITER). Insufficient tritium can made by
the fusion reactor so that tritium must come from another source,
which adds greatly to the cost. In addition, the process generates
significant radiation
16 matches
Mail list logo
