True, but that adds another layer of indirection. AutoCAD is slow and
memory-hungry enough running natively. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Piotr Zielenkiewicz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 2:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows layer storage
On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> David Brodbeck wrote:
> > But there are a few areas that are lacking.
> >
>
> > - CAD software. The company I work for utterly relies on AutoCAD. There's
> > no version of
>
> It really depends on what kind of cad work you want to do, but I found
Of course, but when an app needs two seperate File menus with completely
different entries, something is wrong. ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows layer storage
David Brodbeck wrote:
>
> Well, first let me state that I'm not talking about ease of installation
> here. On a workstation OS, I don't care if individual users can install
> drivers or new software. (In fact, it makes my life easier if they can't.
> ;) ) And if anything Linux would be less ha
rom: Floyd Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Windows layer storage/transmission.
Lord forgive for getting involved with this thread...
Please explain what areas are lacking software for Linux.. I have
yet to know o
This isn't about VNC, so please excuse me.
> Please explain what areas are lacking software for Linux.
Personally, I'd love the idea of a Linux desktop across the workplace, but sadly
it's still a little way off. Who wouldn't like a low cost/free OS that's robust,
stable
and IMO requires less
k
|> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:51 AM
|> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|> Subject: RE: Windows layer storage/transmission.
|>
|>
|> Problem is there's still a distinct lack of software for Linux in some
|> critical areas. The problem with free Open Source software
o get
done. Berating people who need to use Windows won't fix that.
-Original Message-
From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 1:13 AM
To: VNC list
Subject: RE: Windows layer storage/transmission.
Hey, that's a good idea. Maybe we could call i
> Don't know if this item has come up yet, but it seems to me that only
> one graphical buffer is kept and transmitted by VNC. Since most (if
> not all) OSses are window based, is it not more efficient to keep (and
> send) a separate buffer for each window that is opened.
Hmmm... that's a good on
> And by ridiculing people, do you find you convert them?
Sorry for the post to the list, I was intending to send that directly to the
person I was replying too, but sleepy fingers sent the email off before
fixing the little "To" header details.
Happy 2002!
--
The nice thing about standards, t
> Hey, that's a good idea. Maybe we could call it Linux, and give it away
> for free, but then, people who refuse to stop using the inferior product
> for mostly irrational reasons (ever heard of game theory?) would
> constantly make it hard for us with their incompatible protocols and
> inferior
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 12:59, Lee Douglas wrote:
> Here's my New Year's suggestion (not resolution). How about if all of those
> folks who /really/ don't like Windows get together and form another news
> group / list where they can chant things like "windose" and M$, and the
> like all day long
> Perhaps the title should be video layer storage and transmission?
My fault, the s behind Window was a bit too much with hindsight, and I
always use caps at the start of a sentence.
In the original text, I used the word 'window' and did not refer to a
product of a specific manufacturer (besides
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 04:58:12AM -0600, ScanMan wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 03:55, A friend wrote:
> > Why not, for the server, for the client it's no problem for sure. Is
> > it not possible to capture the image from within a single window
> > within MS-Windows? I think it is, since Alt-Pri
Perhaps the title should be video layer storage and transmission?
Most of the code already exist in the rdp2vnc (somewhere in the
contributed part). You should realy check this source code. Rdp use
good caching for bitmaps and fonts.
Text is send as acsii followed by the description (size, font
How about eveyone who takes their OS choice personally form another
mailing list?
Why can't people take gratuitous slaps at Windows,Linux, Mac, Beos or
any other OS on the planet. Especially if it is true? The fact that
Windows puts the GUI in the kernel DOES suck. It makes certain
things(li
implement on any OS "Crapy" or not.
>
>-Shay Erlichmen.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:03 AM
>To: VNC list
>Subject: Re: Windows layer storage/transmission.
>
>
>Unfortunately, th
blit.
-Shay.
-Original Message-
From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:58 PM
To: VNC list
Subject: Re: Windows layer storage/transmission.
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 03:55, A friend wrote:
> Why not, for the server, for the client it's no problem
is the hell part btw) this solotion would actully waste
more CPU and network then the current one.
-Shay.
-Original Message-
From: A friend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:56 AM
To: VNC list
Subject: Re: Windows layer storage/transmission.
> > gra
>> Why not, for the server, for the client it's no problem for sure. Is it
not
>> possible to capture the image from within a single window within
MS-Windows?
>> I think it is, since Alt-PrintScreen does the same thing. Monitoring
window
>> creation/deletion must be possible too.
> Hmmm, yes, I di
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 03:55, A friend wrote:
> Why not, for the server, for the client it's no problem for sure. Is it not
> possible to capture the image from within a single window within MS-Windows?
> I think it is, since Alt-PrintScreen does the same thing. Monitoring window
> creation/deletio
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 03:43, Erlichmen, Shay wrote:
> Wow, do you program with the those filthy fingers. "If you don't have
> something nice to say to don't say nothing at all".
Very clever, Miss Manners.
> Now, "A Friend" The idea the you suggested is already implemented in Citrix,
> and it wou
> > graphical buffer is kept and transmitted by VNC. Since most (if not all)
OSses
> > are window based, is it not more efficient to keep (and send) a separate
> > buffer for each window that is opened. So when switching, closing or
moving a
> Unfortunately, this wouldn't work on crap OS's like Wi
or not.
-Shay Erlichmen.
-Original Message-
From: ScanMan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:03 AM
To: VNC list
Subject: Re: Windows layer storage/transmission.
Unfortunately, this wouldn't work on crap OS's like Windose.
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 02:19,
Unfortunately, this wouldn't work on crap OS's like Windose.
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 02:19, A friend wrote:
> Don't know if this item has come up yet, but it seems to me that only one
> graphical buffer is kept and transmitted by VNC. Since most (if not all) OSses
> are window based, is it not more
Don't know if this item has come up yet, but it seems to me that only one
graphical buffer is kept and transmitted by VNC. Since most (if not all) OSses
are window based, is it not more efficient to keep (and send) a separate
buffer for each window that is opened. So when switching, closing or mov
26 matches
Mail list logo
