Hi, The tools to implement are available, the problem is the quality of the solution. What you suggested is the same as considering each application as a VNCServer and connecting to them all at once. Without a proper caching and manager window layer that needs to exist on the client side (this is the hell part btw) this solotion would actully waste more CPU and network then the current one.
-Shay. -----Original Message----- From: A friend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:56 AM To: VNC list Subject: Re: Windows layer storage/transmission. > > graphical buffer is kept and transmitted by VNC. Since most (if not > > all) OSses > > are window based, is it not more efficient to keep (and send) a > > separate buffer for each window that is opened. So when switching, > > closing or moving a > Unfortunately, this wouldn't work on crap OS's like Windose. Why not, for the server, for the client it's no problem for sure. Is it not possible to capture the image from within a single window within MS-Windows? I think it is, since Alt-PrintScreen does the same thing. Monitoring window creation/deletion must be possible too. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the line: 'unsubscribe vnc-list' in the message BODY See also: http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/intouch.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------
