I'd suggest posting to the rdesktop mailing list. I don't believe
this is a vnc problem.
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer
-
To u
RDP 4.0 was usable over a 56k link if you needed to use
it. I have had problems with VNC locking up in VB applications that
do a lot of refreshes but don't have any problems witn RDP. Besides
that TightVNC has worked great over slow links for administering
workstations.
--
Dav
ble this behaviour.
>
Does anyone know if tridia has plans to release a new version with
some of these fixes?
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer
---
l, where they should be.
Apple using the BSD kernel is actualy helpful. Apple contributes
back to the BSD community. The Release Engineer for FreeBSD works
for apple, so I think he'd be aware of some stealing if such a thing
was possible for the BSD license.
--
David W. Chapman Jr
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 11:31:20PM +0100, James ''Wez'' Weatherall wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, David W . Chapman Jr . wrote:
>
> There is no such thing as a service under win9x. "Services" on this
> platform are simply processes that stay alive acro
e cannot attempt to access the computer?
>
There should be an icon under Admin Tools under the vnc folder on
startup to stop the service.
--
David W. Chapman Jr.
-
To unsubscribe, send a message with the line: unsu
It has something to do with the default password, I had this problem before,
I don't exactly remember the fix though.
- Original Message -
From: "Spain, Jeffry A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 10:29 AM
Subject: Win32 "VNC Authentication Failed" a
whatever the slowest link is will be your bottleneck and be what is slowing
you down. 56k on the client would be faster since you can download at
53kbps(ideal) but if the server had a 56k it could only upload at 28.8k.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm basically trying to decide between a palm 500m or a compaq ipac 3635 for
a few reasons which don't pertain to vnc. But if I understand you correctly
it seems like the palmvnc might be a little faster or dealable if I decide
to use vnc.
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Reiter" <[EMAIL
t;Jacob Kuntz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: Palmtop or Palmpilot
> from the secret journal of David W. Chapman Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I'm trying to decide what would be better for running a vnc client.
W
I'm trying to decide what would be better for running a vnc client. What's
better for running the viewer, a palm pilot or a palm top computer running
windows CE or regular windows 98? any input would be appreciated because I
have no info to go on right now.
--
I think it has to do with the color palette and converting, with 8 bit it
requires a lot of extra work
> Make sure the users are using optimized settings. The fastest setting
> (oddly enough) I've found is 24 bits per pixel on the server end, or use
16
> bits per pixel, then restrict to 8 bits o
Maybe you're using up your bandwidth? I know vnc doesn't usually take up
that much bandwith, but I've seen it burst to 10mbps on my hub on my network
here.
> > So I've got about 300 people using VNC around here. The most common way
> to
> > use it is with a Windows viewer connecting to a UNIX s
I see your point! Its actually 5803 if they haven't changed that yet. On
the version I have, the web server listens on its own port. You would use
http://vnc.serv.er:5803 to connect to display 3(port5903)
> By the way for consistency with other URLs it probably
> should be vnc://vnc.serv.er:59
what wrong with http://vnc.serv.er:5803 ?
> it would be nice if there was a VNC URL so that a web page
> could have a link to vnc://vnc.serv.er:3, and you could
> click on that to bring up a VNC window, just as a telnet
> URL brings up a telnet window.
---
There are definitely two divided sides here, neither side is willing to step
into the middle and come to a compromise, so why don't we all just drop it
or continue it on another list. We know the viewpoints of both sides of the
issue very well.
- Original Message -
From: "Dries Feys" <[E
Squid-proxy and firewall aren't going to catch people deleting system files
> I recommended too him, off list, that perhaps Squid-proxy and a firewall
would
> be a better way to solve the problem. "Control" is always better than
"monitor
> (spy?)", and I think it would require less work. But t
Then do you feel that system administrators are not allowed to check users
email at the request of management? I would not like being spied on, but
what you do at work is the property of the business and as you said if you
don't like their policy just quit. Just having that policy alone usually
Aren't we forgetting that what people do at work is property of the
business, from email to whatever they do at their desktop during business
hours. Granted nobody likes to be spied on, its a decision that should be
made by management/hr departments whether the employees know about it or
not.
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
