I would download and play around with the intel internal EEUpdate
binaries available from IBM's website in an EFI version which you can
load in a VM with the cards PF's assigned to it.
You can also email me if you want the version you can run in a windows
VM in case that doesn't work (I haven't be
On 2017-08-27 18:03, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-22 19:38, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:09:55 +0200
Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-21 19:56, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-19 07:37, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-19 02:34, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/15
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 18:03:25 +0200
Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> On 2017-08-22 19:38, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:09:55 +0200
> > Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> >
> >> On 2017-08-21 19:56, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> >>> On 2017-08-19 07:37, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> On 20
On 2017-08-22 19:38, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:09:55 +0200
Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-21 19:56, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-19 07:37, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-19 02:34, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/15/2017 02:12 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On
FYI there is an intel confidential internal tool called "EEUpdate" as
long as you can find a "normal" EEPROM image with the features you want
then you can flash it to your card.
You can find an EFI version of the tool on IBM's support website, I
suppose this could be a way to "fix" the cheaply
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 23:09:55 +0200
Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> On 2017-08-21 19:56, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> > On 2017-08-19 07:37, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> >> On 2017-08-19 02:34, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> >>> On 08/15/2017 02:12 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> >>>
> On 2017-08-15 02:44,
On 2017-08-21 19:56, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-19 07:37, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-19 02:34, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/15/2017 02:12 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-15 02:44, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/14/2017 12:28 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
yes i noticed tha
On 2017-08-19 07:37, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-19 02:34, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/15/2017 02:12 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-15 02:44, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/14/2017 12:28 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
yes i noticed that part was missing, but the card i have is an
On 2017-08-19 02:34, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/15/2017 02:12 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-15 02:44, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/14/2017 12:28 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
yes i noticed that part was missing, but the card i have is an I350-T2 and
according to:
https://www.intel.c
On 08/15/2017 02:12 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
On 2017-08-15 02:44, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/14/2017 12:28 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
yes i noticed that part was missing, but the card i have is an
I350-T2 and according to:
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/network-and-i-o/
On 2017-08-15 02:44, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
On 08/14/2017 12:28 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
yes i noticed that part was missing, but the card i have is an I350-T2 and
according to:
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/network-and-i-o/ethernet-products/05722.html
the I350-T2 i
On 08/14/2017 12:28 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
yes i noticed that part was missing, but the card i have is an I350-T2
and according to:
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/network-and-i-o/ethernet-products/05722.html
the I350-T2 is supposed to have sr-iov support.
i guess it
On 2017-08-13 22:30, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 15:12:44 +0200
Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection
(rev 01)
Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 15:12:44 +0200
Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network
> Connection (rev 01)
> Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3
> Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable- Count=1/1 Maskable+ 64bit+
> Capabilities: [7
Actually have a Xeon setup where ootb all iommu groups were sane and
separated, I just use the second NIC on my motherboard for the Windows vm
as virtio makes it a bottleneck
On Aug 13, 2017 8:19 AM, "Torbjorn Jansson" <
torbjorn.jans...@mbox200.swipnet.se> wrote:
> On 2017-08-08 00:40, Alex Will
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 09:35:40 +0200
Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
> Hello.
>
> i'm considering upgrading my linux box that i use for virtualization
> (i5-3470,
> Z77 mb).
> at the moment i have a successfully working setup where i pass thru a gtx970
> to
> a windows vm.
> i also have an aging 4 por
On 07/24/2017 03:35 AM, Torbjorn Jansson wrote:
Hello.
i'm considering upgrading my linux box that i use for virtualization
(i5-3470, Z77 mb).
at the moment i have a successfully working setup where i pass thru a
gtx970 to a windows vm.
i also have an aging 4 port network card, see below:
--
Hello.
i'm considering upgrading my linux box that i use for virtualization (i5-3470,
Z77 mb).
at the moment i have a successfully working setup where i pass thru a gtx970 to
a windows vm.
i also have an aging 4 port network card, see below:
--
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporatio
18 matches
Mail list logo
