Anssi Hannula wrote:
> Yes, the ActualDevice() test has to be modified, too. Please try my
> attached patch (it is against 1.4.1-3).
Thanks, works like a charm.
Regards,
Joern
--
Joern Reder
supporting: http://www.zyn.de/
unbelievable: http://www.exit1.org/
CPAN: http://www.perl.com
Jörn Reder wrote:
> Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
>
>
>>Please try the attached patch.
>>With this change "avoiding full featured or primary cards" gets
>>less priority than "using the device with the lowest priority
>>or the lowest number of CA methods".
>
>
> Thanks for your patch, I played around
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Please try the attached patch.
> With this change "avoiding full featured or primary cards" gets
> less priority than "using the device with the lowest priority
> or the lowest number of CA methods".
Thanks for your patch, I played around with it. The ActualDevice() tes
Klaus Schmidinger wrote:
> Jörn Reder wrote:
>
>> ...
>> I'm having problems with VDR's decision of recording devices. The 1.4
>> change log states that budget cards are preferred, unfortunately my
>> budget card has the CI. So when a recording starts and no pay TV channel
>> is actually tuned, th
Jörn Reder wrote:
...
I'm having problems with VDR's decision of recording devices. The 1.4
change log states that budget cards are preferred, unfortunately my
budget card has the CI. So when a recording starts and no pay TV channel
is actually tuned, the CI device is blocked and I can't switc
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 02:52:30PM +0200, Jörn Reder wrote:
>
> Hiho,
>
> I'm a happy VDR user for years and recently installed a common interface
> to receive pay TV.
>
> I'm having problems with VDR's decision of recording devices. The 1.4
> change log states that budget cards are preferred,
