Udo Richter writes:
> Am 23.02.2012 19:36, schrieb Magnus Hörlin:
>> This is an interesting topic and I have had exactly the same ideas. But
>> I think this violates Klaus's "Keep it simple" philosophy and (as usual)
>> I tend to agree with him.
>
> If you've ever read the algorithm that picks th
Am 23.02.2012 19:36, schrieb Magnus Hörlin:
> This is an interesting topic and I have had exactly the same ideas. But
> I think this violates Klaus's "Keep it simple" philosophy and (as usual)
> I tend to agree with him.
If you've ever read the algorithm that picks the best possible device
for a r
On 02/23/2012 04:50 PM, Dominic Evans wrote:
I remember seeing patches for marking channels as identical in terms
of EPG (so e.g., a DVB-S version of the channel can automatically
share the EPG entries from the DVB-T version), but has anyone worked
on a patch for identifying simulcasting channe
I remember seeing patches for marking channels as identical in terms of EPG
(so e.g., a DVB-S version of the channel can automatically share the EPG
entries from the DVB-T version), but has anyone worked on a patch for
identifying simulcasting channels, or even had some preliminary design
thoughts
