Udo Richter <udo_rich...@gmx.de> writes: > Am 23.02.2012 19:36, schrieb Magnus Hörlin: >> This is an interesting topic and I have had exactly the same ideas. But >> I think this violates Klaus's "Keep it simple" philosophy and (as usual) >> I tend to agree with him. > > If you've ever read the algorithm that picks the best possible device > for a recording, you'd probably agreed that we're already way too far > from keeping it simple. These rules are already way too complex. Adding > the complexity of choosing from different quality sources and > up/downgrading other receivers would probably push this a lot further > towards insanity.
Even without the primarylimit it's still deadly complex. The very clever programming syntax used for the device selection makes it very difficult to understand and also to debug. I have an old idea in my head but I've never taken the time to do so, it's also quite erratic: disable channel and device management and allow an external program to decide how to deal with devices and channels. I wouldn't want to start from scratch and work around dvbstreamer, vdr and its plugins are wonderful ! I love it ! (it's just the device and channel management that are too limited imho) I'm not really into C++, it might already be possible to let plugins take over the channel and device management but i doubt it. -- _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
