On Monday, 7. Julyta 2008 12:39:31 Lauri Tischler wrote:
> JJussi wrote:
> > Maybe 2x "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz" is not enough..
>
> Umm.. why does the log say 1596 MHz ?
Because CPU speed is controlled with "ondemand" style. When there is no "need"
for power, speed is lowered.
Lauri Tischler wrote:
> Umm.. why does the log say 1596 MHz ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EIST
Could be SpeedStep.
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr
JJussi wrote:
> Maybe 2x "Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz" is not enough..
Umm.. why does the log say 1596 MHz ?
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz
stepping: 6
cpu MHz : 1596.000
On Monday, 30. Juneta 2008 08:20:20 Anssi Hannula wrote:
> > http://kelvin.aketzu.net/~akolehma/nelonen-hd.ts
>
> Hmm, I indeed get the same message with current ffmpeg SVN (using
> ffplay). However, the picture is decoded fine (!).
I changed my ffmpeg to version 0.4.9_p20080326 and now it don't c
Anssi Kolehmainen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 08:02:05PM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
>> JJussi wrote:
>>> On Sunday, 29. Juneta 2008 03:34:57 Anssi Hannula wrote:
[h264 @ 0xb791d708]PAFF interlacing is not implemented
This indicates that xine-lib is not using a new enough ffmpeg
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 08:02:05PM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
> JJussi wrote:
> > On Sunday, 29. Juneta 2008 03:34:57 Anssi Hannula wrote:
> >> [h264 @ 0xb791d708]PAFF interlacing is not implemented
> >>
> >> This indicates that xine-lib is not using a new enough ffmpeg snapshot
> >> that supports
On Sunday, 29. Juneta 2008 16:35:04 Goga777 wrote:
> yes, it's better to use svn ffmpeg version, but anyway
>
> from this commit
> http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/ffmpeg/trunk/libavcodec/h264.c?r1=13538&r2=13542 we
> can see that in ffmpeg "PAFF + spatial direct mode is not implemented"
> currently
But ho
JJussi wrote:
> On Sunday, 29. Juneta 2008 03:34:57 Anssi Hannula wrote:
>> [h264 @ 0xb791d708]PAFF interlacing is not implemented
>>
>> This indicates that xine-lib is not using a new enough ffmpeg snapshot
>> that supports PAFF.
>>
>> Depending on the version of ffmpeg your distribution provides,
Maybe this gives some light to this matter, in way or other..
I tried to play recording from that channel, with xine.. With verbosity=3.
http://jjussi.pp.fi/logs/NelonenHD_playback.log
--
JJussi
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv
yes, it's better to use svn ffmpeg version, but anyway
from this commit
http://svn.mplayerhq.hu/ffmpeg/trunk/libavcodec/h264.c?r1=13538&r2=13542
we can see that in ffmpeg "PAFF + spatial direct mode is not implemented"
currently
concerning of
[9784] [input_vdr] H.264:-> pts 8176924854
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 12:23:37PM +0300, JJussi wrote:
> On Sunday, 29. Juneta 2008 03:34:57 Anssi Hannula wrote:
> > [h264 @ 0xb791d708]PAFF interlacing is not implemented
> >
IF i remember right, there were commit for replacing that "PAFF +
spatial direct ... not supported" with this "PAF
On Sunday, 29. Juneta 2008 03:34:57 Anssi Hannula wrote:
> [h264 @ 0xb791d708]PAFF interlacing is not implemented
>
> This indicates that xine-lib is not using a new enough ffmpeg snapshot
> that supports PAFF.
>
> Depending on the version of ffmpeg your distribution provides, adding
> --with-exter
JJussi wrote:
> Hi!
> I have vdr-1.7.0 installed and when I tune to that "Nelonen HD" channel, I
> get
> very disordered picture and sound.
> And lot's of errors.
> Have anybody here at HTV are managed to get that h264 channel working, if
> yes,
> how? (What I'm missing)
>
> Full logfile can
Hi!
I have vdr-1.7.0 installed and when I tune to that "Nelonen HD" channel, I get
very disordered picture and sound.
And lot's of errors.
Have anybody here at HTV are managed to get that h264 channel working, if yes,
how? (What I'm missing)
Full logfile can be found http://jjussi.pp.fi/logs/h2
14 matches
Mail list logo
