On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 12:01:50PM +0100, André Weidemann wrote:
>
> On 03.01.2014 22:01, Harald Milz wrote:
> >On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:52:11AM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On Thursday 26 December 2013 19:13:05 Harald Milz wrote:
> >>>Any idea where I should look? Why might
Am 05.01.2014 14:40, schrieb Lars Hanisch:
> "I'll do my very best..." :) Lars.
This is funny! English, but only understood by German.
Gerald
!DSPAM:52c9992d302581408685597!
___
vdr mailing list
vdr@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
>The changes since version 2.1.2:
>- The new function cCamSlot::Decrypt() can be used by derived classes to
>implement a
> CAM slot that can be freely assigned to any device, without being directly
> inserted
> into the full TS data stream in hardware. A derived class that implements
> Decr
Am 05.01.2014 13:01, schrieb fnu:
>> I will! :)
>
> Who not ... ;-)
>
>> Thanks for a bunch of little gems in this release like "obsolete
>> channels".
>
> Yes, indeed ... :tup
>
>> Have to dig into the new CAM stuff, maybe now it's possible to
>> integrate the CI of Digital Devices...
>
>
> I will! :)
Who not ... ;-)
> Thanks for a bunch of little gems in this release like "obsolete
> channels".
Yes, indeed ... :tup
> Have to dig into the new CAM stuff, maybe now it's possible to
> integrate the CI of Digital Devices...
That would be great, christmas has gone recently, but I
Am 05.01.2014 12:42, schrieb Klaus Schmidinger:
> VDR developer version 2.1.3 is now available at
>
> ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-2.1.3.tar.bz2
>
> A 'diff' against the previous version is available at
>
> ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-2.1.2-2.1.3.diff
>
> MD5 checksum
VDR developer version 2.1.3 is now available at
ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-2.1.3.tar.bz2
A 'diff' against the previous version is available at
ftp://ftp.tvdr.de/vdr/Developer/vdr-2.1.2-2.1.3.diff
MD5 checksums:
054f80e0045aa6fad118e9285b52f4f2 vdr-2.1.3.tar.bz2
3c5ab05d5
Hi,
On 03.01.2014 22:01, Harald Milz wrote:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2014 at 11:52:11AM +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 26 December 2013 19:13:05 Harald Milz wrote:
Any idea where I should look? Why might xinelib or vdr-sxfe fail to
correctly detect the ION (MCP79) chip when everything