Re: [vdr] HD Test clip(s)

2013-02-16 Thread VDR User
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Gerald Dachs wrote: If you want the highest quality deinterlacing on 1080i, a GT220 is required. >>> >>> A GT610 is good enough, costs only the half and it is much easier to cool >>> it >>> quietly. >> >> I've read the opposite -- that the GT610 struggle

Re: [vdr] HD Test clip(s)

2013-02-16 Thread Gerald Dachs
Am 16.02.2013 21:28, schrieb VDR User: On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: If you want the highest quality deinterlacing on 1080i, a GT220 is required. A GT610 is good enough, costs only the half and it is much easier to cool it quietly. I've read the opposite -- that the GT6

Re: [vdr] HD Test clip(s)

2013-02-16 Thread VDR User
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Gerald Dachs wrote: >> If you want the highest quality deinterlacing on 1080i, a GT220 is >> required. > > A GT610 is good enough, costs only the half and it is much easier to cool it > quietly. I've read the opposite -- that the GT610 struggle with 1080i highest

Re: [vdr] HD Test clip(s)

2013-02-16 Thread Dr.-Ing. Thomas Ziegler
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 08:14:33AM -0800, VDR User wrote: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:09 AM, wrote: > > Are there any VDR-compatible (I'm using e-tobi 1.7.29) HD test clips, > > available somewhere on the net or can s.o. provide one? > > There are many places hosting HD test clips. You can look

[vdr] [PATCH] Suggest naming central plugin make config as plugin.mk.

2013-02-16 Thread Ville Skyttä
Makes it clearer that it's a Makefile snippet, distinguishes from VDR conf files. Reposted here per Klaus' request, he'd like to see 3 people ack this. --- Make.config.template | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Make.config.template b/Make.config.template index b02

Re: [vdr] HD Test clip(s)

2013-02-16 Thread Gerald Dachs
Am 16.02.2013 17:14, schrieb VDR User: If you want the highest quality deinterlacing on 1080i, a GT220 is required. A GT610 is good enough, costs only the half and it is much easier to cool it quietly. Gerald !DSPAM:511fb59841991258417478! ___ vdr

Re: [vdr] HD Test clip(s)

2013-02-16 Thread VDR User
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:09 AM, wrote: > Are there any VDR-compatible (I'm using e-tobi 1.7.29) HD test clips, > available somewhere on the net or can s.o. provide one? There are many places hosting HD test clips. You can look at: http://www.highdefforum.com/high-definition-movies-video-clips/

[vdr] Device bonding

2013-02-16 Thread Juergen Lock
Hi! Now that I have a spare DVB-S2 tuner (TechniSat SkyStar USB HD (adapter2); the others on this box are atm Hauppauge Nova-TD model 1172 (adapter 0+1) and TechnoTrend S2-3600 (adapter3) - all USB) I decided to play with vdr device bonding. I discovered three things: (still using vdr 1.7.29, I

Re: [vdr] HD Test clip(s)

2013-02-16 Thread Matthias Fechner
Am 16.02.13 14:09, schrieb th_zieg...@gmx.de: > Any other hints regarding what USB DVB-S receiver, sat-dish, etc. > works well is also welcome. as sat-dish I can recommend kathrein (90cm) with kathrein LNB. Is maybe more expensive than other companies, but you get the quality you pay. As Multiswit

[vdr] HD Test clip(s)

2013-02-16 Thread th_ziegler
Hi, Are there any VDR-compatible (I'm using e-tobi 1.7.29) HD test clips, available somewhere on the net or can s.o. provide one? For better comparisson with SD, the a clip from the German ARD- or ZDF-news would be nice. A few minutes is sufficient. Background for those who are interested: I

Re: [vdr] Call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-02-16 Thread Bernard Jaulin
Copy that Klaus ! Here is the good one. Bernard. 2013/2/16 Klaus Schmidinger > On 15.02.2013 21:53, Bernard Jaulin wrote: > >> Klaus, >> >> An error has crept into the last po file line 758 (maybe my new po editor) >> > > If I make a diff between your latest file and the one I have here I get

Re: [vdr] dvbhddevice Makefile missing $(LDFLAGS)

2013-02-16 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 16.02.2013 13:15, Chris Mayo wrote: Been sitting on this for ages but in anticipation of 2.0: --- PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/Makefile.orig +++ PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/Makefile @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ $(SOFILE): $(OBJS) libhdffcmd @$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C libhdffcmd all - $(CXX

[vdr] dvbhddevice Makefile missing $(LDFLAGS)

2013-02-16 Thread Chris Mayo
Been sitting on this for ages but in anticipation of 2.0: --- PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/Makefile.orig +++ PLUGINS/src/dvbhddevice/Makefile @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ $(SOFILE): $(OBJS) libhdffcmd @$(MAKE) --no-print-directory -C libhdffcmd all - $(CXX) $(CXXFLAGS) -shared $(OBJS) libhdffcmd/

Re: [vdr] Call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-02-16 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 15.02.2013 21:53, Bernard Jaulin wrote: Klaus, An error has crept into the last po file line 758 (maybe my new po editor) If I make a diff between your latest file and the one I have here I get: --- po/fr_FR.po 2013/02/15 14:42:17 2.44 +++ po/fr_FR.po 2013/02/16 10:54:16 @@ -10,15 +10,

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.36

2013-02-16 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 16.02.2013 11:43, Joachim Wilke wrote: 2013/2/15 Klaus Schmidinger : I'm not planning to make any more changes to the Makefiles for version 2.0.0. So it will remain broken. Thats sad, I provided the patch already before release of 1.7.37. Well, according to Christopher Reimer it isn't bro

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.36

2013-02-16 Thread Joachim Wilke
2013/2/15 Klaus Schmidinger : > I'm not planning to make any more changes to the Makefiles for version > 2.0.0. So it will remain broken. Thats sad, I provided the patch already before release of 1.7.37. -- Best Regards, Joachim. ___ vdr mailing list