Re: [vdr] Call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-02-15 Thread Bernard Jaulin
Klaus, An error has crept into the last po file line 758 (maybe my new po editor) Cheers. Bernard. 2013/2/15 Bernard Jaulin > Oups, sorry Klaus, since VDR release 1.5 support Unicode (aka utf-8)... > > Bernard. > > > 2013/2/15 Bernard Jaulin > >> Clear, thank you. >> >> Here is a new one. >

Re: [vdr] Request for translate the image-plugin

2013-02-15 Thread Andreas Brachold
Hello, On 15.02.2013, 09:09 +0100 wrote Marx: > Here is my polish translation, not perfect but better then none. It's > UTF-8, is it right? Thank you, for submit a patch with polish translation. I would say the setting of the character set is not really important. But UTF-8 is the best choice.

Re: [vdr] Call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-02-15 Thread Bernard Jaulin
Oups, sorry Klaus, since VDR release 1.5 support Unicode (aka utf-8)... Bernard. 2013/2/15 Bernard Jaulin > Clear, thank you. > > Here is a new one. > > Bernard. > > > 2013/2/15 Klaus Schmidinger > >> On 15.02.2013 00:49, Bernard Jaulin wrote: >> >>> Hi Klaus, >>> >>> The very last po file, w

Re: [vdr] Call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-02-15 Thread Bernard Jaulin
Clear, thank you. Here is a new one. Bernard. 2013/2/15 Klaus Schmidinger > On 15.02.2013 00:49, Bernard Jaulin wrote: > >> Hi Klaus, >> >> The very last po file, with Peter Müster fixes and *Setup.LNB$own* >> translation. >> > > Sorry, your file appears to be UTF-8, while the fr_FR.po I have

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.36

2013-02-15 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 15.02.2013 11:14, Joachim Wilke wrote: 2013/1/26 Christopher Reimer : No, I tried it and it works with and without your patch. CINCLUDES has a lower priority, the order of the parameters matters. And the default INCLUDE stuff comes after CXXFLAGS (CINCLUDES is a part of CXXFLAGS in plugin ma

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] VDR developer version 1.7.36

2013-02-15 Thread Joachim Wilke
2013/1/26 Christopher Reimer : > No, I tried it and it works with and without your patch. > > CINCLUDES has a lower priority, the order of the parameters matters. > And the default INCLUDE stuff comes after CXXFLAGS (CINCLUDES is a > part of CXXFLAGS in plugin makefiles) As the fix is not yet incl

Re: [vdr] Call for translations for VDR version 2.0.0

2013-02-15 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 15.02.2013 00:49, Bernard Jaulin wrote: Hi Klaus, The very last po file, with Peter Müster fixes and *Setup.LNB$own* translation. Sorry, your file appears to be UTF-8, while the fr_FR.po I have is ISO-8859-15. If you want to switch to UTF-8, you will need to also set the "Content-Type" acco

Re: [vdr] Request for translate the image-plugin

2013-02-15 Thread Marx
Here is my polish translation, not perfect but better then none. It's UTF-8, is it right? Marx # * # * Image plugin to VDR (C++) # * # * (C) 2004 - 2007 Andreas Brachold # * based on (C) 2003 Kai Tobias Burwieck # * # * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or # * modi

Re: [vdr] bug in channels.conf.terr?

2013-02-15 Thread Gerald Dachs
Am 2013-02-15 08:49, schrieb Marx: What I would like to have is scraper for KingOfSat which is probably most up-to-date sat channels database. I would prefer to filter this database by provider, sat name etc and produce channels.conf based on it. There would be need to keep some preferences, like

[vdr] Handling large channel list?

2013-02-15 Thread Teemu Suikki
Hi! I have about 9000 channels in my channels.conf at the moment. :) They are currently just grouped by source, otherwise in random order. Many of the channels are radio channels, or encrypted channels which I can't watch. Some encrypted channels I can watch, so I can't just grep out all crypted.

Re: [vdr] bug in channels.conf.terr?

2013-02-15 Thread Marx
I think it touches some bigger problem - the need of scanning. I don't like scan and I doesn't see any need to do it myself on dvb-s (dvb-t works ok). Scanning is full of problems. There aren't unified version of (x)zap (I use command line only). Quality of scan is different on different cards