In message <20090909185925.ga24...@roja.toh.cx>, Thomas Hilber wrote
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:08:39PM +0100, dave cunningham wrote:
Same behaviour with your xorg.conf unfortunately.
I've heard there are some buggy intel-DDXes floating around.
I don't know which one you use. A possible worka
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 11:08:39PM +0100, dave cunningham wrote:
> Same behaviour with your xorg.conf unfortunately.
I've heard there are some buggy intel-DDXes floating around.
I don't know which one you use. A possible workaround is
do add
SubSection "Display"
Virtual
I agree, there is enough crap bouncing around the net. ANd a lot of vdr users
do a lot of reinstalling, changing hardware, etc. So
you would get a lot of false data anyway.
And I refuse to use any program that is lic to a computer by some HW finger
print.
- Original Message -
From: "VD
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Christian Tramnitz wrote:
> I don't think people would like that.
> DRBD has imho a good approach* to track users (and used versions!), but
> regardless of the method, this is certainly not on Klaus' priority list.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Christian (#68)
>
>
> *On f
I don't think people would like that.
DRBD has imho a good approach* to track users (and used versions!), but
regardless of the method, this is certainly not on Klaus' priority list.
Best regards,
Christian (#68)
*On first startup (or after upgrades) a unique ID will generated and the
us
